IP Library Granted Patent US 9,092,921
Granted Patent B2
US 9,092,921 · App. 13/736,842 · Granted Jul 28, 2015

Server determined bandwidth saving in transmission of events

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,092,921
App. No.
13/736,842
Granted
Jul 28, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for receiving a driving event comprises an interface and a processor. An interface is configured to receive a portion of data regarding a driving event. A processor is configured to determine whether more data regarding the driving event should be requested and, in the event that more data regarding the driving event should be requested, request more data regarding the driving event.

Claims (37)

1. A system for receiving a driving event, comprising:

an interface configured to receive a portion of data regarding a driving event from a vehicle event recorder attached to a vehicle; and

a processor configured to:

determine whether more data regarding the driving event should be requested from the vehicle event recorder, wherein the determination that more data should be requested is based at least in part on a set of exceptions in an exception database, wherein the set of exceptions comprise one or more of the following: location-specific legal information exceptions, customer-specific event exceptions, or customer-specific region exceptions; and

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should be requested, request more data from the vehicle event recorder regarding the driving event; and a memory coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions.

2. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should not be requested:

indicate that the data regarding the driving event is to be deleted.

3. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should not be requested:

indicate that the data regarding the driving event is to be soft deleted.

4. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should not be requested:

indicate that the data regarding the driving event is to be marked as not transmitted.

5. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should not be requested:

indicate that the data regarding the driving event is to be marked as deleted.

6. A system as in claim 1 , wherein customer-specific event exceptions comprises driving event trigger exceptions defined by a specific customer of the vehicle event recorder.

7. A system as in claim 1 , wherein customer-specific event exceptions comprises driving event triggers defined by a customer of the vehicle event recorder that more data should not be requested.

8. A system as in claim 1 , wherein customer-specific region exceptions comprises regions where a specific customer of the vehicle event recorder has defined that more data should not be requested.

9. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the data regarding the driving event includes video information or still picture information.

10. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine a current segment.

11. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine subsegment information.

12. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should be requested, mark that the driving event has been checked against the exception database.

13. A system as in claim 12 , wherein the driving event is marked with an indication of a version or date of the exception database.

14. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the data regarding the driving event includes an indication of a version or date of the exception database.

15. A system as in claim 1 , wherein non-transmitting criteria used by the processor for determining whether more data regarding the driving event should be requested comprises the set of exceptions.

16. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the location specific legal exceptions comprise one or more of the following: a speed limit error, a stop sign error, a parking zone error, or a railroad crossing error.

17. A method for receiving a driving event, comprising:

receiving a portion of data regarding a driving event from a vehicle event recorder attached to a vehicle;

determining, using a processor, whether more data regarding the driving event should be requested from the vehicle event recorder, wherein the determination that more data should be requested is based at least in part on a set of exceptions in an exception database, wherein the set of exceptions comprise one or more of the following: location-specific legal information exceptions, customer-specific event exceptions, or customer-specific region exceptions; and

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should be requested, requesting more data from the vehicle event recorder regarding the driving event.

18. A computer program product for receiving a driving event, the computer program product being embodied in a tangible computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:

receiving a portion of data regarding a driving event from a vehicle event recorder attached to a vehicle;

determining whether more data regarding the driving event should be requested from the vehicle event recorder, wherein the determination that more data should be requested is based at least in part on a set of exceptions in an exception database, wherein the set of exceptions comprise one or more of the following: location-specific legal information exceptions, customer-specific event exceptions, or customer-specific region exceptions; and

in the event that more data regarding the driving event should be requested, requesting more data from the vehicle event recorder regarding the driving event.

Assignments (8)
NOTICE OF SUCCESSOR AGENT AND ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST (PATENTS) REEL/FRAME 043745/0567 Recorded Feb 28, 2020
From: HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC
To: GUGGENHEIM CREDIT SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 052050/0115 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2017
From: U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: LYTX, INC.
Reel/Frame 043743/0648 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2017
From: LYTX, INC.
To: HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 043745/0567 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2016
From: LYTX, INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 038103/0508 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 032134/0756 Recorded Mar 15, 2016
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: LYTX, INC.
Reel/Frame 038103/0328 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 29, 2014
From: LYTX, INC.; MOBIUS ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 032134/0756 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 14, 2014
From: DRIVECAM, INC.
To: LYTX, INC.
Reel/Frame 032019/0172 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 3, 2013
From: LAMBERT, DANIEL; BOTNEN, JOSHUA DONALD
To: DRIVECAM, INC.
Reel/Frame 030146/0782 →