IP Library Granted Patent US 9,509,554
Granted Patent B1
US 9,509,554 · App. 14/514,171 · Granted Nov 29, 2016

Methods and apparatus for remediation execution

Inventors: David Whitlock (Portland, OR); Guy Gascoigne-Piggford (Portland, OR); Geoff Granum (Portland, OR); Mark Petrie (Portland, OR)
Assignee: Tripwire, Inc.
H04L41/0631H04L41/0816
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,509,554
App. No.
14/514,171
Granted
Nov 29, 2016
Kind
B1
Abstract

Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and articles associated with remediation execution. In embodiments, a set of policy test failures may be selected for remediation. The set of policy test failures may be associated with a computer network with a number of nodes. For each failure within the set of policy test failures, a remediation script may be obtained to remediate a corresponding policy test failure. The remediation scripts may be selectively provided to nodes that are affected by policy test failures, for execution by the nodes. A remediation script result for each remediation script executed may be received. Based upon the remediation script results, it may be determined whether or not execution of the remediation scripts was successful.

Claims (59)

1. A method comprising:

selecting, by a computing device, a set of policy test failures for remediation, the set of policy test failures being associated with a computer network having a plurality of nodes;

for each failure within the set of policy test failures, obtaining, by the computing device, a remediation script corresponding to the policy test failure;

providing, by the computing device, the remediation scripts, selectively, to the nodes that are affected by the policy test failures, for execution by the nodes;

subsequent to execution of the remediation scripts, gathering, by the computing device, a list of post-remediation categories from policy tests;

coalescing, by the computing device, duplicate post-remediation categories;

based upon the list of post-remediation categories, determining, by the computing device, post-remediation functions to be performed;

eliminating, by the computing device, redundant post-remediation functions; and

executing or causing to be executed, by the computing device, the post-remediation functions.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

queuing, by the computing device, the remediation scripts for providing to the one or more nodes, such that only one remediation script per node is executed at a time.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining whether or not execution of the remediation scripts was successful by determining whether an exit code for a particular remediation script executed at a node has a non-zero value, indicating execution of the particular remediation script at the node failed.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving, by the computing device, from the nodes, a remediation script result for each remediation script executed; and

based upon the remediation script results, determining, by the computing device, whether or not execution of the remediation scripts was successful.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

adding to the policy tests, by the computing device, information including operations required after selective execution of the remediation script at the nodes; and

based upon the information and subsequent to the execution of the remediation scripts, executing or causing to be executed, by the computing device, one or more of the operations within the computer network.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the information includes one or more services that need to be started subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts, services that need to be stopped subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts, services that need to be re-started subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts, or nodes that need to be re-booted subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the information further includes one or more of either an identity of each of one or more nodes within the computer network that is affected by the selective execution of the remediation scripts or the remediation scripts selectively provided to the nodes for execution, or both.

8. An article of manufacture comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium; and

a plurality of programming instructions stored on the storage medium and configured to program one or more computing devices, in response to execution of the programming instructions, to perform operations including:

selecting a set of policy test failures for remediation, the policy test failures being associated with a computer network having a plurality of nodes;

for each failure within the set of policy test failures, obtaining a remediation script for execution by one or more nodes to remediate a corresponding policy test failure;

providing, selectively, the remediation scripts to the nodes that are affected by the policy test failures, for execution by the nodes;

subsequent to execution of all remediation scripts, gathering, by the computing device, a list of post-remediation categories from policy tests;

coalescing, by the computing device, duplicate post-remediation categories;

based upon the list of post-remediation categories, determining, by the computing device, post-remediation functions to be performed;

eliminating, by the computing device, redundant post-remediation functions; and

executing or causing to be executed, by the computing device, the post-remediation functions.

9. The article of manufacture of claim 8 , wherein the operations further include:

queuing remediation scripts for providing to the one or more nodes, such that only one remediation script per node is executed at a time.

10. The article of manufacture of claim 8 , wherein the operations further include determining whether or not execution of the remediation scripts was successful by determining whether an exit code for a particular execution of a remediation script at a node has a non-zero value, indicating the particular execution of the remediation script at the node failed.

11. The article of manufacture of claim 8 , wherein the operations further include:

receiving, by the computing device, from the nodes, a remediation script result for each remediation script executed; and

based upon the remediation script results, determining, by the computing device, whether or not execution of the remediation scripts was successful.

12. The article of manufacture of claim 8 , wherein the operations further include:

based upon information within the policy tests and subsequent to executing the remediation scripts, executing one or more operations within the computer network.

13. The article of manufacture of claim 12 , wherein the information includes one or more services that need to be started subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts, services that need to be stopped subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts, services that need to be re-started subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts or nodes that need to be re-booted subsequent to the selective execution of the remediation scripts.

14. The article of manufacture of claim 12 , wherein the information further includes either an identity of each of one or more nodes within the computer network that is affected by execution of the remediation scripts, or one or more of the remediation scripts for execution by the nodes, or both.

15. An apparatus comprising:

one or more processors; and

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium coupled to the one or more processors, and having stored therein a plurality of programming instructions stored on the storage medium and configured to cause the apparatus, in response to execution of the programming instructions, to:

select a set of policy test failures for remediation, the policy test failures being associated with a computer network having a plurality of nodes;

for a failure within the set of policy test failures, obtain a remediation script for execution by one or more nodes to remediate a corresponding policy test failure;

provide, selectively, the remediation script to the one or more nodes that are affected by the policy test failures, for execution by the nodes;

prior to the execution of the remediation script, harvest a pre-remediation state of each of the nodes that are affected by the policy test failures; and

after execution of the remediation script:

harvest a post-remediation state of each of the nodes that are affected by the policy test failures;

compare the pre-remediation state with the post-remediation state for each of the nodes that are affected by the policy test failures to detect nodes having states, content, or both states and content that have changed;

compile a list of the nodes having states, content, or both states and content that have changed;

correlate the list of the nodes with the nodes to which the remediation script was provided; and

determine, based on the correlation, one or more nodes whose changes were due to the execution of the remediation script.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the programming instructions are further configured to cause the apparatus, in response to execution of the programming instructions, to:

queue remediation scripts for providing to the one or more nodes, such that only one remediation script per node is executed at a time.

17. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the programming instructions are further configured to cause the apparatus, in response to execution of the programming instructions, to:

generate a report identifying the one or more nodes whose changes were due to execution of the remediation scripts; and

determine, based on the report, that the one or more nodes whose changes were due to execution of the remediation script are not in violation of one or more policy tests as a result of at least one of the changes.

Assignments (7)
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 60306/0365 Recorded Nov 24, 2025
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 074023/0235 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 60306/0555 Recorded Nov 24, 2025
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 074023/0320 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 60306/0649 Recorded Nov 21, 2025
From: ACQUIOM AGENCY SERVICES LLC
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 073663/0698 →
ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 14, 2025
From: GOLUB CAPITAL MARKETS LLC (AS EXISTING AGENT)
To: ACQUIOM AGENCY SERVICES LLC (AS SUCCESSOR COLLATERAL AGENT)
Reel/Frame 072471/0665 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 7, 2022
From: TRIPWIRE, INC.
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 060306/0365 →
SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 7, 2022
From: TRIPWIRE, INC.
To: GOLUB CAPITAL MARKETS LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 060306/0649 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 11, 2014
From: WHITLOCK, DAVID; GASCOIGNE-PIGGFORD, GUY; GRANUM, GEOFF; PETRIE, MARK
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 034483/0546 →
Continuity (1)
Continuation 13235182 · Sep 16, 2011