IP Library Granted Patent US 9,582,821
Granted Patent B2
US 9,582,821 · App. 14/720,399 · Granted Feb 28, 2017

System and method for providing an intelligent configuration rationalization solution

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,582,821
App. No.
14/720,399
Filed
May 22, 2015
Granted
Feb 28, 2017
Kind
B2
Examiner
HO, BINH VAN
Art Unit
2163
USPC
707/1
Abstract

A system and method are disclosed for rationalizing configurations associated with one or more products. The system includes a database associated with one or more customers. The system further includes an order analysis system coupled with the database. The order analysis system is capable of rationalizing the differences between configurations of various combinations of options that are stored in the database.

Claims (78)

1. A system for rationalizing configuration option packages displayed in a graphical user interface, comprising:

a computer system coupled with a database and comprising one or more processors and memory, the computer system configured to:

display a filter criteria comprising two or more filter criteria elements within a graphical user interface;

display a configuration listing comprising two or more configuration listings elements within the graphical user interface;

search the database for configuration data representing two or more configuration option packages of one or more products based on a selection of the two or more filter criteria elements;

rationalize differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products;

display the configuration data within the configuration listing of the graphical user interface based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages; and

store the configuration data in the database; and

an engineering computer system coupled with the computer system, the engineering computer system configured to implement one or more products using two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the back-log of orders of one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the order history of one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the two or more configuration option packages offered by one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the two or more filter criteria elements further comprises elements selected from the group consisting of:

a region criteria;

a product category criteria;

a sales industry criteria;

an order code criteria;

an order type criteria;

an order status criteria; and

a date range criteria.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the two or more configuration listings elements comprises elements selected from the group consisting of:

a type element;

a filter element;

a part element;

a search element; and

a configurations element.

7. A computer-implemented method for rationalizing configuration option packages displayed in a graphical user interface, the method comprising:

displaying a filter criteria comprising two or more filter criteria elements within a graphical user interface;

displaying a configuration listing comprising two or more configuration listings elements within the graphical user interface;

searching a database for configuration data representing two or more configuration option packages of one or more products based on a selection of the two or more filter criteria elements;

rationalizing differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products;

displaying the configuration data within the configuration listing of the graphical user interface based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages;

storing the configuration data in the database; and

implementing, by an engineering computer system, one or more products using two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the back-log of orders of one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the order history of one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the two or more configuration option packages offered by one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the two or more filter criteria elements further comprises elements selected from the group consisting of:

a region criteria;

a product category criteria;

a sales industry criteria;

an order code criteria;

an order type criteria;

an order status criteria; and

a date range criteria.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the two or more configuration listings elements comprises elements selected from the group consisting of:

a type element;

a filter element;

a part element;

a search element; and

a configurations element.

13. The system of claim 7 , wherein the engineering computer system configured to implement one or more products using the two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products comprises building, by a factory, one or more products using the two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products.

14. The method of claim 7 , wherein implementing, by an engineering computer system, one or more products using the two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products comprises building, by a factory, one or more products using the two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising software for rationalizing configuration option packages displayed in a graphical user interface, the software when executed configured to:

display a filter criteria comprising two or more filter criteria elements within a graphical user interface;

display a configuration listing comprising two or more configuration listings elements within the graphical user interface;

search a database for configuration data representing two or more configuration option packages of one or more products based on a selection of the two or more filter criteria elements;

rationalize differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products;

display the configuration data within the configuration listing of the graphical user interface based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages;

store the configuration data in the database; and

implement, by an engineering computer system, one or more products using two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the back-log of orders of one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the database comprises data that describes the two or more configuration option packages offered by one or more customers associated with the one or more products.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the two or more filter criteria elements further comprises elements selected from the group consisting of:

a region criteria;

a product category criteria;

a sales industry criteria;

an order code criteria;

an order type criteria;

an order status criteria; and

a date range criteria.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the two or more configuration listings elements comprises elements selected from the group consisting of:

a type element;

a filter element;

a part element;

a search element; and

a configurations element.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein implement one or more products using the two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products comprises build, by a factory, one or more products using the two or more parts based on the rationalization of the differences between the two or more configuration option packages of the one or more products.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053383/0117) Recorded Nov 3, 2021
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 058794/0776 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 16, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.; BLUE YONDER, INC.; JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC.; I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC; MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC.; MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC.; REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC; JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC.; REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION; BY BOND FINANCE, INC.; BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC.; BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 057724/0593 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 3, 2020
From: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053383/0117 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 13, 2020
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 052386/0114 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: RP CROWN PARENT, LLC; RP CROWN HOLDING LLC; JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040326/0449 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 26, 2015
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 035773/0423 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2015
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 035714/0246 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2015
From: REHMAN, AAMER; BIER, JONATHAN; GANESAN, SURIYA
To: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 035714/0076 →