IP Library Granted Patent US 9,679,487
Granted Patent B1
US 9,679,487 · App. 14/989,946 · Granted Jun 13, 2017

Alert notifications utilizing broadcasted telematics data

Inventor: Gregory Hayward (Bloomington, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G08G1/166B60Q5/006G08G1/0104H04L65/4076
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,679,487
App. No.
14/989,946
Filed
Jan 7, 2016
Granted
Jun 13, 2017
Kind
B1
Art Unit
2632
USPC
340/903
Abstract

Geographic location data and telematics data may be collected in real-time by a mobile device within a vehicle, or the vehicle itself. The telematics data may indicate vehicle direction, speed, motion, etc., as well as traffic hazards in the surrounding environment. A remote server may receive the location and telematics data from two vehicles. If an anomalous or hazardous condition exists in the vicinity of the first vehicle, a geographic relationship with the second vehicle is determined, and if within a predetermined distance, an alert or alternate route for the second vehicle is determined and transmitted to the second vehicle. As a result, a negative impact or risk of collision caused by the anomalous condition on the second vehicle is alleviated. The amount of the insured's usage of the telematics data-based risk mitigation or prevision functionality may be used to calculate or adjust insurance premiums, rates, or discounts.

Claims (85)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving, by one or more processors, first and second geographic location data indicative of a geographic location of a first and a second vehicle, respectively, via wireless communication or data transmission;

receiving, by one or more processors, first and second telematics data indicative of a motion of the first and the second vehicle, respectively, via wireless communication or data transmission;

determining, by one or more processors, whether an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle based upon the first telematics data;

calculating, by one or more processors, a geographic relationship between the first vehicle and the second vehicle based upon the first and the second geographic location data; and

transmitting, by one or more processors, via wireless communication or data transmission, an alert or an audio recommendation indicative of the anomalous condition to a computing device associated with the second vehicle when (i) the one or more processors determine that the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle, and (ii) the geographic relationship between the first and second vehicles satisfies a threshold distance condition to facilitate alleviating a risk of the second vehicle experiencing a physical vehicle collision that could be caused by the anomalous condition.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the act of receiving the first and second geographic data and the first and second telematics data comprises:

receiving the first and second geographic location data from a first and a second mobile computing device travelling within the first and the second vehicle, respectively; and

receiving the first and second telematics data from the first and the second mobile computing device, respectively, via wireless communication or data transmission,

wherein the first and second telematics data includes acceleration, braking, gyroscope, compass heading, turning, and speed information for the first and the second vehicle, respectively.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first telematics data includes data selected from one or more of, and not limited to all of:

a timestamp;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of braking motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of acceleration motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of cornering motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of a direction of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of a usage of a first mobile computing device associated with the first vehicle;

a battery level associated with the first mobile computing device; and

a usage indicator associated with the first mobile computing device.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the act of determining whether an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle comprises:

determining, based upon the first telematics data, whether a speed of the first vehicle is less than a threshold speed or a posted speed limit for a given road.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating, by one or more processors, a geofenced area around the first vehicle, and

wherein the threshold distance condition comprises:

the second vehicle being located within the geofenced area.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising:

determining, by one or more processors, a population density corresponding to the geographic location of the first vehicle based upon the first telematics data; and

adjusting, by one or more processors, the geofenced area based upon the population density.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold distance condition comprises:

the second vehicle being within a threshold distance of the first vehicle.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , the method further comprising:

determining or identifying, by one or more processors, an insured customer having a mobile device or vehicle configured with a Telematics Application that collects telematics data or has risk mitigation or prevention functionality that utilizes telematics data of the vehicle or other vehicles; and

adjusting or modifying, by one or more processors, an insurance policy, premium, or discount for the insured customer based upon their having a mobile device or vehicle equipped with the Telematics Application or risk mitigation or prevention functionality that utilizes the telematics data.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , the method further comprising:

identifying, by one or more processors, an insured customer having a mobile computing device or vehicle configured with telematics data-based risk mitigation or prevention functionality;

monitoring, by one or more processors, a usage amount associated with the insured customer driving an insured vehicle while the telematics data-based risk mitigation or prevention functionality is performed on the mobile computing device or vehicle; and

adjusting, by one or more processors, an insurance policy, premium, or discount for the insured customer based upon the usage amount.

10. A non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium storing machine readable instructions for generating alerts that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to:

receive first and second geographic location data indicative of a geographic location of a first and a second vehicle, respectively, via wireless communication or data transmission;

receive first and second telematics data indicative of a motion of the first and the second vehicle, respectively, via wireless communication or data transmission;

determine whether an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle based upon the first telematics data;

calculate a geographic relationship between the first vehicle and the second vehicle based upon the first and the second geographic location data; and

transmit or send an alert indicative of the anomalous condition to a computing device associated with the second vehicle via wireless communication or data transmission, when (i) the one or more processors determine that the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle, and (ii) the geographic relationship between the first and second vehicles satisfies a threshold distance condition to facilitate warning drivers of the anomalous condition and reducing a risk of the second vehicle experiencing a physical vehicle collision that could be caused by the anomalous condition.

11. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions to receive the first and second geographic data and the first and second telematics data include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

receive the first and second geographic location data from a first and a second mobile computing device travelling within the first and the second vehicle, respectively; and

receive the first and second telematics data from the first and the second mobile computing device, respectively, via wireless communication or data transmission,

wherein the first and second telematics data includes acceleration, braking, gyroscope, compass heading, turning, and speed information for the first and the second vehicle, respectively.

12. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the first telematics data includes data selected from one or more of, and not limited to all of:

a timestamp;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of braking motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of acceleration motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of cornering motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of a direction of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of a usage of a first mobile computing device associated with the first vehicle;

a battery level associated with the first mobile computing device; and

a usage indicator associated with the first mobile computing device.

13. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions to determine whether the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to determine whether a speed of the first vehicle is less than a threshold speed.

14. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , further including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

calculate a geofenced area around the first vehicle, and

wherein the instructions to generate the alert further include instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to generate the alert when the second vehicle is located within the geofenced area.

15. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 14 , further including instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

determine a population density corresponding to the geographic location of the first vehicle based upon the first telematics data; and

adjust the geofenced area based upon the population density.

16. The non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the threshold distance condition comprises:

the second vehicle being within a threshold distance of the first vehicle.

17. A first mobile computing device located within a first vehicle, comprising:

a communication unit configured to receive, via wireless communication or data transmission: (i) telematics data from a second mobile computing device indicative of a motion of a second vehicle in which the second mobile computing device is located, and (ii) geographic location data indicative of a location of the second vehicle; and

a processor configured to:

determine whether an anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the second vehicle based upon the geographic location data;

determine a geographic location of the first mobile computing device;

calculate a geographic relationship between the first vehicle and the second vehicle based upon the geographic location data and the geographic location of the first mobile computing device; and

generate an alert indicative of the anomalous condition when (i) the processor determines that the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the second vehicle, and (ii) the geographic relationship between the first and second vehicles satisfies a threshold distance condition to facilitate warning drivers of the anomalous condition and to reduce a risk of the first vehicle experiencing a physical vehicle collision that could be caused by the anomalous condition.

18. The first mobile computing device of claim 17 , wherein the telematics data and the geographic location data is received in accordance with a communication technique including one or more of:

peer-to-peer communications between the first mobile computing device and the second mobile computing device; and

network communications between the first mobile computing device and the second mobile computing device via an external computing device.

19. The first mobile computing device of claim 17 , wherein the telematics data includes data selected from one or more of, and not limited to all of:

a timestamp;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of braking motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of acceleration motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of cornering motion of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of a direction of the first vehicle;

one or more sensor metrics indicative of a usage of the first mobile computing device;

a battery level associated with the first mobile computing device; and

a usage indicator associated with the first mobile computing device.

20. The first mobile computing device of claim 17 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine whether the anomalous condition is present at the geographic location of the first vehicle based upon whether a speed of the first vehicle is less than a threshold speed.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2023
From: HYUNDAI; KIA
To: HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY; KIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062290/0655 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2022
From: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
To: HYUNDAI; KIA
Reel/Frame 062190/0037 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 12, 2016
From: HAYWARD, GREGORY
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 037465/0466 →
Continuity (15)
Provisional Application 62250286 · Nov 3, 2015
Provisional Application 62247334 · Oct 28, 2015
Provisional Application 62232035 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232045 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232054 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232050 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232065 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232097 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232083 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232075 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62232090 · Sep 24, 2015
Provisional Application 62207561 · Aug 20, 2015
Provisional Application 62204749 · Aug 13, 2015
Provisional Application 62113749 · Feb 9, 2015
Provisional Application 62105468 · Jan 20, 2015