IP Library Granted Patent US 10,599,747
Granted Patent B1
US 10,599,747 · App. 16/125,405 · Granted Mar 24, 2020

System and method for forecasting photovoltaic power generation system degradation

Inventor: Thomas E. Hoff (Napa, CA)
Assignee: Clean Power Research, L.L.C.
G06F17/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,599,747
App. No.
16/125,405
Granted
Mar 24, 2020
Kind
B1
Abstract

Long-term photovoltaic system degradation can be predicted through a simple, low-cost solution. The approach requires the configuration specification for a photovoltaic system, as well as measured photovoltaic production data and solar irradiance, such as measured by a reliable third party source using satellite imagery. Note the configuration specification can be derived. This information is used to simulate photovoltaic power production by the photovoltaic system, which is then evaluated against the measured photovoltaic production data to determine the degree of error between simulated and measured production. The simulated production is adjusted to account for the error and to infer degradation that can be projected over time to forecast long-term photovoltaic system degradation.

Claims (128)

1. A system for forecasting photovoltaic power generation system degradation, comprising the steps of:

a power meter capable of assessing measured photovoltaic production for a photovoltaic system operating at a known location over a set time period;

a monitoring infrastructure capable of assessing measured solar irradiance data for the known location over a reference time period that minimally overlaps with the set time period;

a configuration specification for the photovoltaic system; and

a digital computer comprising a processor and a memory that is adapted to store program instructions for execution by the processor, the program instructions capable of:

simulating time-series photovoltaic production by the photovoltaic system using the configuration specification and the solar irradiance data for the reference time period;

deriving adjustment factors by minimizing error between the time-series simulated photovoltaic production and the measured solar irradiance data;

creating adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production by multiplying the time-series simulated photovoltaic production by the adjustment factors;

calculating normalized ratios of the adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production to the time-series simulated photovoltaic production for a current time period and a time period previous to the current time period; and

selecting a degradation time period and calculating degradation of the photovoltaic system as a function of the normalized ratio for the current time period and the normalized ratio for the previous time period.

2. A system according to claim 1 , the program instructions further capable of:

calculating the degradation for consecutive degradation time periods; and

forecasting long-term degradation by evaluating a trend in the degradation for the consecutive time periods.

3. A system according to claim 2 , the program instructions further capable of:

evaluating the trend as the average of the long-term degradations for the consecutive time periods; and

evaluating the trend as the mean of the long-term degradations for the consecutive time periods.

4. A system according to claim 2 , the program instructions further capable of:

omitting the degradation for a first year of operation for the photovoltaic system.

5. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the long-term degradation Degradation t for the current time period t is determined in accordance with:

Degradation

t

=

1

-

Adjusted

Simulated

t

-

1

/

Simulated

t

-

1

Adjusted

Simulated

t

/

Simulated

t

where Adjusted Simulated t-1 represents the adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the previous time period; Simulated t-1 represents the time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the previous time period; Adjusted Simulated t represents the adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the current time period; and Simulated t represents the time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the current time period.

6. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the previous time period represents a first year of operation for the photovoltaic system, the program instructions further capable of:

normalizing the normalized ratio for the current time period by dividing by the normalized ratio for the previous time period.

7. A system according to claim 1 , the program instructions further capable of at least one of:

minimizing the error by evaluating relative mean absolute error;

minimizing the error by evaluating mean bias error; and

minimizing the error by evaluating root mean square error.

8. A system according to claim 1 , wherein the configuration specification is derived, the program instructions further capable of:

obtaining ambient temperature measured for the known location over the set time period; and

searching for optimal values for each variable in a configuration specification for the photovoltaic system by optimizing each variable, one at a time.

9. A system according to claim 8 , the program instructions further capable of:

selecting a candidate value for the variable being optimized;

simulating photovoltaic production for the photovoltaic system using the ambient temperature, the solar irradiance data, and the candidate value;

calculating error between the simulated photovoltaic production and the measured photovoltaic production; and

choosing the candidate value as the optimal value for the variable being optimized upon the error meeting a minimal threshold of error.

10. A system according to claim 1 , the program instructions for simulating time-series photovoltaic production being further capable of:

generating a set of sky clearness indexes as a ratio of each irradiance observation in a set of irradiance observations that has been regularly measured for the known location over the set time period, and clear sky irradiance;

forming a time series of the set of the sky clearness indexes;

determining irradiance statistics for the photovoltaic system through statistical evaluation of the time series of the set of the sky clearness indexes; and

building power statistics for the photovoltaic system as a function of the photovoltaic system irradiance statistics and the configuration specification.

11. A method for forecasting photovoltaic power generation system degradation with the aid of a digital computer, comprising the steps of:

assessing through a power meter measured photovoltaic production for a photovoltaic system operating at a known location over a set time period;

assessing through a monitoring infrastructure measured solar irradiance data for the known location over a reference time period that minimally overlaps with the set time period;

referencing a configuration specification for the photovoltaic system; and

operating a digital computer comprising a processor and a memory that is adapted to store program instructions for execution by the processor, the program instructions capable of:

simulating time-series photovoltaic production by the photovoltaic system using the configuration specification and the solar irradiance data for the reference time period;

deriving adjustment factors by minimizing error between the time-series simulated photovoltaic production and the measured solar irradiance data;

creating adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production by multiplying the time-series simulated photovoltaic production by the adjustment factors;

calculating normalized ratios of the adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production to the time-series simulated photovoltaic production for a current time period and a time period previous to the current time period; and

selecting a degradation time period and calculating degradation of the photovoltaic system as a function of the normalized ratio for the current time period and the normalized ratio for the previous time period.

12. A method according to claim 11 , the program instructions further capable of:

calculating the degradation for consecutive degradation time periods; and

forecasting long-term degradation by evaluating a trend in the degradation for the consecutive time periods.

13. A method according to claim 12 , the program instructions further capable of:

evaluating the trend as the average of the long-term degradations for the consecutive time periods; and

evaluating the trend as the mean of the long-term degradations for the consecutive time periods.

14. A method according to claim 12 , the program instructions further capable of:

omitting the degradation for a first year of operation for the photovoltaic system.

15. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the long-term degradation Degradation t for the current time period t is determined in accordance with:

Degradation

t

=

1

-

Adjusted

Simulated

t

-

1

/

Simulated

t

-

1

Adjusted

Simulated

t

/

Simulated

t

where Adjusted Simulated t-1 represents the adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the previous time period; Simulated t-1 represents the time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the previous time period; Adjusted Simulated t represents the adjusted time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the current time period; and Simulated t represents the time-series simulated photovoltaic production for the current time period.

16. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the previous time period represents a first year of operation for the photovoltaic system, the program instructions further capable of:

normalizing the normalized ratio for the current time period by dividing by the normalized ratio for the previous time period.

17. A method according to claim 11 , the program instructions further capable of at least one of:

minimizing the error by evaluating relative mean absolute error;

minimizing the error by evaluating mean bias error; and

minimizing the error by evaluating root mean square error.

18. A method according to claim 11 , wherein the configuration specification is derived, the program instructions further capable of:

obtaining ambient temperature measured for the known location over the set time period; and

searching for optimal values for each variable in a configuration specification for the photovoltaic system by optimizing each variable, one at a time.

19. A method according to claim 18 , the program instructions further capable of:

selecting a candidate value for the variable being optimized;

simulating photovoltaic production for the photovoltaic system using the ambient temperature, the solar irradiance data, and the candidate value;

calculating error between the simulated photovoltaic production and the measured photovoltaic production; and

choosing the candidate value as the optimal value for the variable being optimized upon the error meeting a minimal threshold of error.

20. A method according to claim 11 , the program instructions for simulating time-series photovoltaic production being further capable of:

generating a set of sky clearness indexes as a ratio of each irradiance observation in a set of irradiance observations that has been regularly measured for the known location over the set time period, and clear sky irradiance;

forming a time series of the set of the sky clearness indexes;

determining irradiance statistics for the photovoltaic system through statistical evaluation of the time series of the set of the sky clearness indexes; and

building power statistics for the photovoltaic system as a function of the photovoltaic system irradiance statistics and the configuration specification.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2018
From: HOFF, THOMAS E.
To: CLEAN POWER RESEARCH, L.L.C.
Reel/Frame 046819/0458 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation In Part 15588550 · May 5, 2017
Continuation In Part 14223926 · Mar 24, 2014
Continuation 13784560 · Mar 4, 2013
Continuation 13462505 · May 2, 2012
Continuation 13453956 · Apr 23, 2012
Continuation 13190442 · Jul 25, 2011
Cited By (4)
US 12,293,373 US 12,360,502 US 12,470,171 US 12,553,329