Methods for evaluating superabrasive elements
Embodiments of methods are disclosed for characterizing a tested superabrasive element, such as a polycrystalline diamond element. In an embodiment, a method of characterizing the relative strength of a superabrasive element is disclosed. A first superabrasive element and a second superabrasive element are positioned upper surface to upper surface, including an area of overlap between the upper surfaces. A load is applied while the first and second superabrasive elements are overlapped until failure of one or both of the first or second superabrasive elements fail. A relative strength is determined using at least the load during failure as a parameter.
1. A method of characterizing a relative strength of a superabrasive element, the method comprising:
positioning a first superabrasive element having a first superabrasive table bonded to a first substrate, the first superabrasive table defining a first upper surface, and a second element having a second upper surface, so that the first and second upper surfaces face substantially parallel to each other and define an area of overlap therebetween, wherein a portion of the first upper surface and a portion of the second upper surface are outside the area of overlap;
loading, along an axis of loading, the first superabrasive element and the second element against each other while overlapped such that the first upper surface of the first superabrasive table is forced against the second upper surface of the second element;
observing, during the act of loading, at least one failure event in the first superabrasive element; and
characterizing the relative strength of the first superabrasive element based at least partially on the at least one failure event;
wherein movement of the first superabrasive element and movement of the second element are fixtured to be constrained to directions parallel to the axis of loading throughout the acts of loading and observing.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein positioning a first superabrasive element having a first superabrasive table and a second element so that the first and second upper surfaces define an overlap includes placing the first superabrasive element and the second element in a fixture to constrain the movement of the first superabrasive element and the movement of the second element to the directions parallel to the axis of loading, wherein the axis of loading is located in the area of overlap.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the relative strength of the first superabrasive element further includes at least partially basing the relative strength on a ratio of a load applied during the loading to the area of overlap.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting at least one superabrasive element fabrication parameter based on at least the characterization of the relative strength.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first superabrasive element and the second element are different sizes.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first superabrasive element and the second element include one or more of a substantially identical geometry or composition.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first superabrasive element and the second element exhibit unequal elastic moduli.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein characterizing the relative strength of the first superabrasive element includes at least partially basing the relative strength characterization on thickness of the first superabrasive table in the first superabrasive element.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
recording at least one acoustic emission produced during loading using an acoustic sensor;
recording at least one image of the first superabrasive element during loading using an optical sensor;
correlating the at least one acoustic emission and the at least one image to characterize the at least one acoustic emission; and
characterizing the relative strength of the first superabrasive element at least partially based on the at least one acoustic emission.
10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
recording at least one acoustic emission produced during loading using an acoustic sensor;
correlating the at least one acoustic emission to an applied load at the time of the at least one acoustic emission; and
characterizing the relative strength of the first superabrasive element at least partially based on the correlation of the at least one acoustic emission to the applied load at the time of the at least one acoustic emission.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein characterizing the relative strength of the first superabrasive element at least partially based on the at least one acoustic emission includes generating a load versus acoustic emission curve and integrating the area under the curve.
12. A method of characterizing a relative strength of a polycrystalline diamond (“PCD”) element, the method comprising:
positioning a first PCD element having a first PCD table bonded to a first substrate, the first PCD table defining a first upper surface, and a second element having a second upper surface, so that the first and second upper surfaces face substantially parallel to each other and define an area of overlap therebetween, wherein a portion of the first upper surface and a portion of the second upper surface are outside the area of overlap;
loading, along an axis of loading, the first PCD element and the second element against each other while overlapped with a compressive load such that the first upper surface of the first PCD table is forced against the second upper surface;
observing, during the act of loading, at least one failure event in the first PCD element; and
characterizing the relative strength of the first PCD element based at least partially on one or more observations made during the at least one failure event;
wherein movement of the first PCD element and movement of the second element are fixtured to be constrained to directions parallel to the axis of loading throughout the acts of loading and observing.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first PCD table is at least partially leached.
14. The method of claim 12 , wherein characterizing the relative strength of the first PCD element further includes dividing a load applied during the loading by the area of overlap.
15. The method of claim 12 , wherein characterizing the relative strength of the first PCD element further includes determining a relative strength value for the first PCD element,
the method further comprising comparing the determined relative strength value for the first PCD element with one or more relative strength values for other PCDs.
16. The method of claim 12 , wherein observing at least one failure event includes recording at least one acoustic emission produced during loading using an acoustic sensor and the method further includes:
correlating the at least one acoustic emission to an applied load at a time of the at least one acoustic emission; and
characterizing the relative strength of the first PCD element at least partially based on the correlation of the at least one acoustic emission to the applied load at the time of the at least one acoustic emission.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein characterizing the relative strength of the first PCD element at least partially based on the correlation of the at least one acoustic emission to the applied load at the time of the at least one acoustic emission includes generating a load versus acoustic emission curve and integrating an area underneath the load versus acoustic emission curve to determine a relative strength value.
18. The method of claim 16 , further comprising adjusting at least one PCD element fabrication parameter based on at least the characterization of the relative strength.