IP Library Granted Patent US 10,690,078
Granted Patent B2
US 10,690,078 · App. 15/962,650 · Granted Jun 23, 2020

System and method for estimating engine exhaust nitrogen oxide sensor instability

Inventors: Askin Minaz (Aurora, IL); Robert Manoni (Streamwood, IL)
Assignee: International Engine Intellectual Property Company, LLC
F02D41/1462F01N3/206F01N3/208F01N2550/05F01N2560/026F01N2900/0416F01N2900/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,690,078
App. No.
15/962,650
Granted
Jun 23, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method is provided for estimating engine exhaust nitrogen oxide sensor signal instability in transient conditions, for example when rapid changes occur in driver demanded torque, and for eliminating fluctuations in EONOx sensor signal status, in order to have more robust on-board diagnostics monitoring and exhaust nitrogen oxide control. The system and method predicts EONOx sensor signal instability by comparing a calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta to calculated instability thresholds and instability threshold hysteresis margins, and generates instability flags. The system and method further validates any predicted EONOx sensor signal instability by observation. Upon validation of the predicted EONOx sensor signal instability, the system and method latches the EONOx sensor signal status to a stable value.

Claims (97)

1. A vehicle, comprising:

an engine;

an exhaust system connected to the engine and receiving exhaust gasses therefrom, the exhaust system having an exhaust aftertreatment system;

an Engine Out Nitrogen Oxide (EONOx) sensor connected to the exhaust system and providing a signal indicating Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) content in the exhaust gasses to at least one controller, the at least one controller being configured to:

predict instability in the EONOx sensor signal,

validate the predicted instability in the EONOx sensor signal, and

upon prediction and validation of instability in the EONOx sensor signal, latch the EONOx sensor signal to a stable value; and

the at least one controller being further configured to predict instability in the EONOx sensor signal by:

calculating a pedal based driver demand torque,

calculating a pedal based driver demand torque delta,

calculating instability thresholds for the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta,

detecting instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque by comparing the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta to the instability thresholds, and

setting an instability flag predicting instability in the EONOx sensor signal when instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque is detected.

2. The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to calculate the pedal based driver demand torque by:

comparing an accelerator pedal position and a present engine speed using a table based mapping or transfer function, and determining from the table based mapping or transfer function a calculated pedal torque request,

multiplying a present transmission gear ratio with a vehicle specific rear axle ratio using a ratio multiplier to produce an overall drivetrain ratio, and

multiplying the calculated pedal torque request with the overall drivetrain ratio using a pedal torque request drivetrain ratio multiplier to produce the calculated pedal based driver demand torque.

3. The vehicle of claim 2 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to calculate the pedal based driver demand torque delta by:

applying a slow response factor low pass filter to the calculated pedal based driver demand torque,

applying a fast response factor low pass filter to the calculated pedal based driver demand torque, and

comparing an output from the slow response factor low pass filter and an output from the fast response factor low pass filter in a difference calculation to produce the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta.

4. The vehicle of claim 3 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to calculate instability thresholds for the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta by:

entering the calculated pedal torque request and the overall drivetrain ratio into a table based instability threshold mapping function, and

using the table based instability threshold mapping function to provide a low instability threshold and a high instability threshold, together defining a decision window.

5. The vehicle of claim 4 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to detect instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque by:

setting the instability flag if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta is greater than the low instability threshold value but lesser than the high instability threshold value, and

clearing the instability flag if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta is lesser than the low instability threshold value or greater than the high instability threshold value.

6. The vehicle of claim 5 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to generate a high instability threshold hysteresis margin above the high instability threshold, and a low instability threshold hysteresis margin below the low instability threshold, and to:

set the instability flag when the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the low instability threshold value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta increases from below the low instability threshold to between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold, or when the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the high instability threshold value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta decreases from above the high instability threshold to between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold, and

clear the instability flag when calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the low instability threshold hysteresis margin value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta decreases from between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold to below the low instability threshold, or when the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the high instability threshold hysteresis margin value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta increases from between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold to above the high instability threshold.

7. The vehicle of claim 1 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to validate the predicted EONOx sensor signal instability by observing the EONOx sensor signal for an observation period following a setting of the instability flag.

8. An exhaust aftertreatment system of a vehicle, comprising:

an Engine Out Nitrogen Oxide (EONOx) sensor connected to the exhaust aftertreatment system and providing a signal indicating Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) content in the exhaust gasses to at least one controller, the at least one controller being configured to:

predict instability in the EONOx sensor signal,

validate the predicted instability in the EONOx sensor signal, and

upon prediction and validation of instability in the EONOx sensor signal, latch the EONOx sensor signal to a stable value; and

the at least one controller being further configured to predict instability in the EONOx sensor signal by:

calculating a pedal based driver demand torque,

calculating a pedal based driver demand torque delta,

calculating instability thresholds for the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta,

detecting instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque by comparing the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta to the instability thresholds, and

setting an instability flag predicting instability in the EONOx sensor signal when instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque is detected.

9. The exhaust aftertreatment system of a vehicle of claim 8 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to calculate the pedal based driver demand torque by:

comparing an accelerator pedal position and a present engine speed using a table based mapping or transfer function, and determining from the table based mapping or transfer function a calculated pedal torque request,

multiplying a present transmission gear ratio with a vehicle specific rear axle ratio using a ratio multiplier to produce an overall drivetrain ratio, and

multiplying the calculated pedal torque request with the overall drivetrain ratio using a pedal torque request drivetrain ratio multiplier to produce the calculated pedal based driver demand torque.

10. The exhaust aftertreatment system of a vehicle of claim 9 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to calculate the pedal based driver demand torque delta by:

applying a slow response factor low pass filter to the calculated pedal based driver demand torque,

applying a fast response factor low pass filter to the calculated pedal based driver demand torque, and

comparing an output from the slow response factor low pass filter and an output from the fast response factor low pass filter in a difference calculation to produce the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta.

11. The exhaust aftertreatment system of a vehicle of claim 10 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to calculate instability thresholds for the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta by:

entering the calculated pedal torque request and the overall drivetrain ratio into a table based instability threshold mapping function, and

using the table based instability threshold mapping function to provide a low instability threshold and a high instability threshold, together defining a decision window.

12. The exhaust aftertreatment system of a vehicle of claim 11 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to detect instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque by:

setting the instability flag if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta is greater than the low instability threshold value but lesser than the high instability threshold value, and

clearing the instability flag if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta is lesser than the low instability threshold value or greater than the high instability threshold value.

13. The exhaust aftertreatment system of a vehicle of claim 12 , wherein:

the at least one controller being further configured to generate a high instability threshold hysteresis margin above the high instability threshold, and a low instability threshold hysteresis margin below the low instability threshold, and to:

set the instability flag when the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the low instability threshold value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta increases from below the low instability threshold to between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold, or when the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the high instability threshold value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta decreases from above the high instability threshold to between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold, and

clear the instability flag when calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the low instability threshold hysteresis margin value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta decreases from between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold to below the low instability threshold, or when the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta crosses the high instability threshold hysteresis margin value if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta increases from between the low instability threshold and the high instability threshold to above the high instability threshold.

14. A method of estimating EONOx sensor signal instability in transient conditions and eliminating fluctuations in the EONOx sensor signal, comprising the steps of:

predicting instability in the EONOx sensor signal by:

calculating a pedal based driver demand torque,

calculating a pedal based driver demand torque delta,

calculating instability thresholds for the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta,

detecting instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque by comparing the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta to the instability thresholds, and

setting an instability flag predicting instability in the EONOx sensor signal when instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque is detected;

validating the predicted instability in the EONOx sensor signal, and

upon prediction and validation of instability in the EONOx sensor signal, latching the EONOx sensor signal to a stable value.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising the steps of:

calculating the pedal based driver demand torque by:

comparing an accelerator pedal position and a present engine speed using a table based mapping or transfer function, and determining from the table based mapping or transfer function a calculated pedal torque request,

multiplying a present transmission gear ratio with a vehicle specific rear axle ratio using a ratio multiplier to produce an overall drivetrain ratio, and

multiplying the calculated pedal torque request with the overall drivetrain ratio using a pedal torque request drivetrain ratio multiplier to produce the calculated pedal based driver demand torque,

calculating the pedal based driver demand torque delta by:

applying a slow response factor low pass filter to the calculated pedal based driver demand torque,

applying a fast response factor low pass filter to the calculated pedal based driver demand torque, and

comparing an output from the slow response factor low pass filter and an output from the fast response factor low pass filter in a difference calculation to produce the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta,

calculating instability thresholds for the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta by:

entering the calculated pedal torque request and the overall drivetrain ratio into a table based instability threshold mapping function, and

using the table based instability threshold mapping function to provide a low instability threshold and a high instability threshold, together defining a decision window.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising the steps of:

detecting instability in the calculated pedal based driver demand torque by:

setting the instability flag if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta is greater than the low instability threshold value but lesser than the high instability threshold value, and

clearing the instability flag if the calculated pedal based driver demand torque delta is lesser than the low instability threshold value or greater than the high instability threshold value.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising the steps of:

validating the predicted EONOx sensor signal instability by observing the EONOx sensor signal for an observation period following a setting of the instability flag.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 53545/443 Recorded Jul 15, 2021
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
To: NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; INTERNATIONAL ENGINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; NAVISTAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 057441/0404 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 2, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: INTERNATIONAL ENGINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; NAVISTAR, INC. (F/KA/ INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION); INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 056757/0136 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CONVEYING PARTY DATA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 052483 FRAME: 0742. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST.. Recorded Apr 27, 2020
From: NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL ENGINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; NAVISTAR, INC. (F/K/A INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION)
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 053457/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 27, 2020
From: NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL ENGINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; NAVISTAR, INC. (F/K/A INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION)
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 053545/0443 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 23, 2020
From: INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; INTERNATIONAL ENGINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC; NAVISTAR, INC. (F/K/A INTERNATIONAL TRUCK AND ENGINE CORPORATION)
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 052483/0742 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2018
From: MINAZ, ASKIN; MANONI, ROBERT
To: INTERNATIONAL ENGINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 047694/0717 →