IP Library Granted Patent US 12,373,517
Granted Patent B1
US 12,373,517 · App. 19/084,039 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Systems and methods of sensor data fusion

Inventor: Armando Montalvo (Winter Garden, FL)
Assignee: Digital Global Systems, Inc.
G06F18/25G06F18/217
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,373,517
App. No.
19/084,039
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

Systems and methods of sensor data fusion including sensor data capture, curation, linking, fusion, inference, and validation. The systems and methods described herein reduce computational demand and processing time by curating data and calculating conditional entropy. The system is operable to fuse data from a plurality of sensor types. A computer processor optionally stores fused sensor data that the system validates above a mathematical threshold.

Claims (47)

1. A system for sensor data fusion for sensor management and utilization in autonomous transportation, comprising:

at least one computer processor including a memory;

at least one curation engine, at least one link engine, at least one fusion engine, at least one inference engine, and at least one validation engine;

at least one first distance sensor operable to capture a first distance measurement from a vehicle to at least one object; and

at least one second distance sensor operable to capture a second distance measurement from the vehicle to the at least one object;

wherein the at least one computer processor is operable to analyze the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement;

wherein the at least one curation engine is operable to curate the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, the at least one link engine is operable to link the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, the at least one fusion engine is operable to fuse the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, the at least one inference engine is operable to determine at least one inference from the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, and the at least one validation engine is operable to validate the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement;

wherein the at least one inference engine is operable to determine a second inference;

wherein the at least one validation engine validates the at least one inference when a comparison between the at least one inference and the second inference exceeds a predefined threshold; and

wherein the at least one computer processor is operable to instruct the vehicle based on the at least one inference being validated.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the predefined threshold includes the at least one inference being within about 1% or less of the second inference.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the system is operable to store the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement after the at least one validation engine validates the at least one inference.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one validation engine is operable to validate the at least one inference passively and/or actively.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein passive validation includes not modifying an orientation of the at least one first distance sensor and/or the at least one second distance sensor.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein active validation includes modifying an orientation of the at least one first distance sensor and/or the at least one second distance sensor.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one validation engine is operable to use artificial intelligence to dynamically adjust the predefined threshold.

8. A method for sensor data fusion for sensor management and utilization in autonomous transportation, comprising:

providing at least one computer processor including a memory;

providing at least one curation engine, at least one link engine, at least one fusion engine, at least one inference engine, and at least one validation engine;

at least one first distance sensor capturing a first distance measurement from a vehicle to at least one object;

at least one second distance sensor capturing a second distance measurement from the vehicle to the at least one object;

analyzing by the at least one computer processor the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement;

curating by the at least one curation engine the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, linking by the at least one link engine the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, fusing by the at least one fusion engine the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, determining at least one inference by the at least one inference engine from the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement, and validating by the at least one validation engine the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement;

determining by the at least one inference engine a second inference;

validating by the at least one validation engine the at least one inference when a comparison between the at least one inference and the second inference exceeds a predefined threshold; and

instructing by the at least one computer processor the vehicle based on the at least one inference being validated.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the predefined threshold includes the at least one inference being within about 1% or less of the second inference.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising validating the at least one inference passively and/or actively.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein validating passively includes not modifying an orientation of the at least one first distance sensor and/or the at least one second distance sensor.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein validating actively includes modifying an orientation of the at least one first distance sensor and/or the at least one second distance sensor.

13. The method of claim 8 , further comprising adjusting via the at least one validation engine using artificial intelligence the predefined threshold.

14. The method of claim 8 , further comprising storing the first distance measurement and the second distance measurement after the at least one validation engine validates the at least one inference.

15. A system for sensor data fusion for sensor management and utilization in autonomous transportation, comprising:

at least one computer processor including a memory;

at least one curation engine, at least one link engine, at least one fusion engine, at least one inference engine, and at least one validation engine; and

at least two sensors, each of the at least two sensors operable to measure a first distance from a vehicle to at least one object and a second distance from the vehicle to the at least one object;

wherein the at least one computer processor is operable to analyze the first distance and the second distance;

wherein the at least one curation engine is operable to curate the first distance and the second distance, the at least one link engine is operable to link the first distance and the second distance, the at least one fusion engine is operable to fuse the first distance and the second distance, the at least one inference engine is operable to determine at least one inference from the first distance and the second distance, and the at least one validation engine is operable to validate the first distance and the second distance;

wherein the at least one inference engine is operable to determine a second inference;

wherein the at least one validation engine validates the at least one inference when a comparison between the at least one inference and the second inference exceeds a predefined threshold;

wherein the at least one validation engine is operable to use artificial intelligence to dynamically adjust the predefined threshold; and

wherein the at least one computer processor is operable to instruct the vehicle based on the at least one inference being validated.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the predefined threshold includes the at least one inference being within about 1% or less of the second inference.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the at least one validation engine is operable to validate the at least one inference passively and/or actively.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein passive validation includes not modifying a parameter.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein active validation includes modifying at least one parameter.

20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the system is operable to store the first distance and the second distance after the at least one validation engine validates the at least one inference.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2025
From: MONTALVO, ARMANDO
To: DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 070588/0888 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 19024518 · Jan 16, 2025
Continuation 18990248 · Dec 20, 2024
Continuation 18988120 · Dec 19, 2024
References Cited (82)
US 9367683B2 · Kolacinski et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10095230B1 · Hardin · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10748075B2 · Chowdhary et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10766137B1 · Porter et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11037320B1 · Ebrahimi Afrouzi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11040444B2 · Cristache · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11586865B2 · Brahma et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11966413B2 · Latapie · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11983625B2 · Ahuja et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12105211B2 · Carcanague et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20040019575A1 · Talbot et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070239314A1 · Kuvich · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20120134280A1 · Rotvold et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150306770A1 · Mittal et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170004411A1 · Hassan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170048010A1 · Chowdhery et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190206400A1 · Cui et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190258251A1 · Ditty et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190295001A1 · Fusco et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200026289A1 · Alvarez et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200303033A1 · Benz et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200405403A1 · Shelton, IV et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210150230A1 · Smolyanskiy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210278523A1 · Urtasun et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210290311A1 · Fuerst et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210331695A1 · Ramakrishnan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220012562A1 · Lazaro-Gredilla et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220035376A1 · Laddah et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220075077A1 · Kato et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220126864A1 · Moustafa et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220146652A1 · Cardei et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220161815A1 · Van Beek et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220179056A1 · Braley et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220324464A1 · Collin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220348223A1 · Zhao et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230082656A1 · Li et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230110027A1 · Bajpayee et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230112441A1 · Tang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230149101A1 · Mottram et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230166765A1 · Yoon et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230182768A1 · Oh · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230190204A1 · Helm et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230256618A1 · Park et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230270506A1 · Goodchild et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230342944A1 · Sullivan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230347517A1 · Ma et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230394334A1 · Kang · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240045426A1 · Ditty et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240058948A1 · Zhai et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240112428A1 · Levi et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240123619A1 · Ning · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240138926A1 · Goodchild et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240142994A1 · Ebrahimi Afrouzi · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240152734A1 · Ye · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240159891A1 · Patel · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240249165A1 · Roche et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240267779A1 · Wu et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240289930A1 · Yang et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240289981A1 · Kuo et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240296044A1 · Day et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240312219A1 · Choi et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240317254A1 · Tran · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240324838A1 · Ebrahimi Afrouzi · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240331403A1 · Shen et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240378412A1 · Schrader · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240382216A1 · Hage et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240408495A1 · Hibi et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240412494A1 · Balachandran et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250026371A1 · Andert et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20250139807A1 · Zou et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 110598299 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110909762A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 115561795 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 115561795A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 118427205A · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Lanegger et al., “To Fuse or Not to Fuse: Measuring Consistency in Multi-Sensor Fusion for Aerial Robots” Springer, Aug. 2024 (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “A Method for Improving the Pose Accuracy of a Robot Manipulator Based on Multi-Sensor Combined Measurement and Data Fusion” Sensors 2015, 15, 7933-7952 (Year: 2015). [cited by applicant]
Brush, “Measurement of microwave power—A review of techniques used for measurement of high-frequency RF power” IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine Apr. 2007 (Year: 2007). [cited by applicant]
Kleber et al., “Cooperative Cross-Correlation Algorithm to Optimize Linearity of Fused RF Sensors” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, No. 7, Apr. 1, 2020 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Ebel, Patrick, and et al. “SEN12MS-CR-TS: A remote-sensing data set for multi modal multitemporal cloud removal.” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60 (2022): 1-14 (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
Wei Z, and et al. MmWave Radar and Vision Fusion for Object Detection in Autonomous Driving: A Review. Sensors (Basel). Mar. 25, 2022;22(7):2542. doi: 10.3390/s22072542. PMID: 35408157; PMCID: PMC9003130 (Year: 2022). [cited by applicant]
Yeong, D. J., Velasco-Hernandez, G., Barry, J., & Walsh, J. (2021). Sensor and sensor fusion technology in autonomous vehicles: A review. Sensors, 21(6), 2140. (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]