IP Library Granted Patent US 12,430,479
Granted Patent B1
US 12,430,479 · App. 19/003,325 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

Systems and methods for generative building design and manufacturer integration

Inventors: John Klein (Boston, MA); Robert W. Uhlenbrock (Cincinnati, OH); Katherine Fairbanks (Cincinnati, OH); John Fechtel (Gainesville, FL); Neil Chatterjee (Duivendrecht Noord-Holland, NL); Marks J. Grikis (Riga, LV)
Assignee: Generate Technologies Inc.
G06F30/13
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,430,479
App. No.
19/003,325
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

A computer-aided system and associated method for automated building design includes receiving input parameters and generating a three-dimensional parametric computer model of a building frame and populating the three-dimensional computer building model with generic and manufacturer-specific products by accessing internal and external data sources. The populated computer model undergoes real-time simulation to analyze regulatory compliance, verify engineering requirements including load calculations, and evaluate cost considerations. Based on simulation results, the method generates output documents including requests for proposals (RFP documents) for contractors, requests for quotations (RFQs) for vendors, and regulatory compliance documentation. These documents are transmitted to respective stakeholders through a secure data exchange protocol. The method further includes receiving responses to the generated RFP documents/RFQs.

Claims (41)

1. A system comprising at least one processor and a memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system to:

receive, during a single active design session, a plurality of building design parameters via at least one input interface;

generate, during the single active design session, a three-dimensional computational building model based on the received plurality of building design parameters and on data retrieved by accessing an internal system product repository having a generic product library and a manufacturer-specific product library;

integrate, during the single active design session, generic and manufacturer-specific components and assemblies within the three-dimensional computational building model;

execute, during the single active design session, at least one computational simulation on the integrated three-dimensional computational building model;

automatically generate, during the single active design session, a plurality of electronic documentation outputs based on results of the at least one computational simulation;

automatically transmit, during the single active design session, the generated plurality of electronic documentation outputs to external systems of contractors for requests for proposal (RFP) documents, manufacturers for requests for quotation (RFQ) documents, and regulatory authorities for compliance verification documents; and

receive one or more electronic responses corresponding to the automatically transmitted requests for proposal (RFP), requests for quotation (RFQ) and regulatory compliance verification documents via at least one communication interface.

2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising re-executing, over one or more iterations, the at least one computational simulation within a same single active design session based on different manufacturer-specific components and/or assemblies integrated into the three-dimensional computational building model.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one computational simulation of the three-dimensional computational building model is selected from a group consisting of: a static load analysis, a dynamic load analysis, a material properties validation, a foundation stability analysis, a frame stability analysis, a deflection analysis, an inter-story drift analysis, a reliability analysis, and a critical member definition.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the receiving the plurality of building design parameters is selected from a group consisting of: retrieving a predefined building configuration from a building configuration database, accessing a geographic information system (GIS) database to retrieve land site map data parameters for a specified location; and accessing a municipal records database to retrieve building code requirements and zoning regulations for a specified location.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of electronic documentation outputs comprise at least one of: contractor requests for proposal (RFP) documents, manufacturer requests for quotation (RFQ) documents, and regulatory compliance verification documents, wherein the RFP, RFQ and regulatory compliance documents are generated in a format that is compatible with documentation formats of the contractors, the manufacturers, and the regulatory authorities whose components, assemblies and services are selected for use with the three-dimensional computational building model at the integration step.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the receiving the plurality of building design parameters comprises receiving user-defined input parameters comprising at least one of spatial-layout parameters, material selection parameters, and regulatory requirement parameters.

7. The system of claim 1 , further comprising generating a data analytics package in addition to the plurality of electronic documentation outputs, wherein the data analytics package includes a database enabling stakeholders to perform ad-hoc business analysis on project data including cost analyses, performance metrics, material specifications, simulation results, and optimization outcomes generated during the design session.

8. The system of claim 1 , further configured to identify generic products or manufacturer-specific products that match the plurality of building design parameters and to display the generic products or the manufacturer-specific products on the at least one input interface.

9. A method, comprising:

receiving, during a single active design session, a plurality of building design parameters via at least one input interface;

generating, during the single active design session, a three-dimensional computational building model based on the received plurality of building design parameters and on data retrieved by accessing an internal system product repository having a generic product library and a manufacturer-specific product library;

integrating, during the single active design session, generic and manufacturer-specific components and assemblies within the three-dimensional computational building model;

executing, during the single active design session, at least one computational simulation on the integrated three-dimensional computational building model;

automatically generating, during the single active design session, a plurality of electronic documentation outputs based on results of the at least one computational simulation;

automatically transmitting, during the single active design session, the generated plurality of electronic documentation outputs to external systems of contractors for requests for proposal (RFP) documents, manufacturers for requests for quotation (RFQ) documents, and regulatory authorities for compliance verification documents; and

receiving one or more electronic responses corresponding to the automatically transmitted requests for proposal (RFP), requests for quotation (RFQ) and regulatory compliance verification documents via at least one communication interface.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising re-executing, over one or more iterations, the at least one computational simulation within a same single active design session based on different manufacturer-specific components and/or assemblies integrated into the three-dimensional computational building model.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the at least one computational simulation of the three-dimensional computational building model is selected from a group consisting of: a static load analysis, a dynamic load analysis, a material properties validation, a foundation stability analysis, a frame stability analysis, a deflection analysis, an inter-story drift analysis, a reliability analysis, and a critical member definition.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein receiving the plurality of building design parameters is selected from a group consisting of: retrieving a predefined building configuration from a building configuration database, accessing a geographic information system (GIS) database to retrieve land site map data parameters for a specified location; and accessing a municipal records database to retrieve building code requirements and zoning regulations for a specified location.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of electronic documentation outputs comprise at least one of: contractor requests for proposal (RFP) documents, manufacturer requests for quotation (RFQ) documents, and regulatory compliance verification documents, wherein the requests for proposal (RFP), requests for quotation (RFQ) and regulatory compliance documents are generated in a format that is compatible with documentation formats of the contractors, the manufacturers, and the regulatory authorities whose components, assemblies and services are selected for use with the three-dimensional computational model at the integration step.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the receiving the plurality of building design parameters comprises receiving user-defined input parameters comprising at least one of spatial-layout parameters, material selection parameters, and regulatory requirement parameters.

15. The method of claim 9 , further comprising generating a data analytics package in addition to the plurality of electronic documentation outputs, wherein the data analytics package includes a database enabling stakeholders to perform ad-hoc business analysis on project data including cost analyses, performance metrics, material specifications, simulation results, and optimization outcomes generated during the design session.

16. The method of claim 9 , further comprising identifying generic products or manufacturer-specific products that match the plurality of building design parameters and displaying the generic products or the manufacturer-specific products on the at least one input interface.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, including instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations to:

receive, during a single active design session, a plurality of building design parameters via at least one input interface;

generate, during the single active design session, a three-dimensional computational building model based on the received plurality of building design parameters and on data retrieved by accessing an internal system product repository having a generic product library and a manufacturer-specific product library;

integrate, during the single active design session, generic and manufacturer-specific components and assemblies within the three-dimensional computational building model;

execute, during the single active design session, at least one computational simulation on the integrated three-dimensional computational building model;

automatically generate, during the single active design session, a plurality of electronic documentation outputs based on results of the at least one computational simulation;

automatically transmit, during the single active design session, the generated plurality of electronic documentation outputs to external systems of contractors for requests for proposal (RFP) documents, manufacturers for requests for quotation (RFQ) documents, and regulatory authorities for compliance verification documents; and

receive one or more electronic responses corresponding to the automatically transmitted requests for proposal (RFP), requests for quotation (RFQ) and regulatory compliance verification documents via at least one communication interface.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , further comprising re-executing, over one or more iterations, the at least one computational simulation within a same single active design session based on different manufacturer-specific components and/or assemblies integrated into the three-dimensional computational building model.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the at least one computational simulation of the three-dimensional computational building model is selected from a group consisting of: a static load analysis, a dynamic load analysis, a material properties validation, a foundation stability analysis, a frame stability analysis, a deflection analysis, an inter-story drift analysis, a reliability analysis, and a critical member definition.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of electronic documentation outputs comprise at least one of: contractor requests for proposal (RFP) documents, manufacturer requests for quotation (RFQ) documents, and regulatory compliance verification documents, wherein the requests for proposal (RFP), requests for quotation (RFQ) and regulatory compliance documents are generated in a format that is compatible with documentation formats of the contractors, the manufacturers, and the regulatory authorities whose components, assemblies and services are selected for use with the three-dimensional computational building model at the integration step.

Assignments (2)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE EXECUTION DATE FOR INVENTOR JOHN FECHTEL FROM 12/24/2025 TO 12/25/2025 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 69693 FRAME 239. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Aug 15, 2025
From: KLEIN, JOHN; UHLENBROCK, ROBERT W.; FAIRBANKS, KATHERINE; CHATTERJEE, NEIL; GRIKIS, MARKS J.; FECHTEL, JOHN
To: GENERATE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 072491/0558 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 27, 2024
From: KLEIN, JOHN; UHLENBROCK, ROBERT W.; FAIRBANKS, KATHERINE; FECHTEL, JOHN; CHATTERJEE, NEIL; GRIKIS, MARKS J.
To: GENERATE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 069693/0239 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 63719517 · Nov 12, 2024
References Cited (53)
US 6628279B1 · Schell et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 10260232B1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10290004B1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10695597B2 · Conboy · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10814150B2 · Conboy · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11074374B2 · Tierney et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11232508B2 · Krappė · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11395931B2 · Conboy · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11400324B2 · Conboy · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11686105B2 · Beyreuther et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11702837B2 · Beyreuther et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11826592B2 · Conboy · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11865390B2 · Conboy · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11865394B2 · Conboy · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11960798B1 · Cudzik et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11972174B2 · Ayalon · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11977821B1 · Marsh et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11993927B2 · Beyreuther et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12226661B2 · Conboy · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 20070226648A1 · Hudson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20190168036A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190168047A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190168410A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190169837A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190169841A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190171999A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190172071A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190172149A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190172160A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190172161A1 · Conboy · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20220016461A1 · Conboy · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220136232A1 · Schneider et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220136234A1 · Schneider et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220196491A1 · Dubov · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220251836A1 · Mathey et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220275634A1 · Malczyk et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220275635A1 · Malczyk et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220362600A1 · Conboy · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20240252857A1 · Conboy · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240252866A1 · Conboy · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240252870A1 · Conboy · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240257265A1 · Conboy · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240366982A1 · Conboy · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250041636A1 · Conboy · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 118642376A · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022169918A2 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Farias, Francisco, “Contemporary Strategies for Sustainable Design”, May 2013, Dissertation, Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University. (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Park, Kyoung-Jun et al., “Structuring a BIM Service Scoping, Tendering, Executing, and Wrapping-Up (STEW) Guide for Public Owners”, Mar. 23, 2022, Applied Sciences, MDPI. (Year: 2022). [cited by examiner]
Toussant, Luis et al., “PLM-Based Approach for Design Verification and Validation using Manufacturing Process Knowledge”, 2010, Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, vol. 8, No. 1. (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
“Freres Lumber Mass Plywood Panels Awarded Patents in U.S. and Canada; MPP Passes Fire Safety Standards,” News Release, Lyons, Ore. Jan. 31, 2019, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Lakehead University team patents design for product for mass timber high-rises,” NWOnewswatch.com, <https://www.nwonewswatch.com/local-news/lakehead-university-team-patents-design-for-product-for-mass-timber-high-rises… [cited by applicant]
“Dialog Pursues Global Patents for Structural System to Bring Mass Timber Technology to High Rise Buildings,” PR Newswire, <https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/dialog-pursues-global-patents-for-structural-system-to… [cited by applicant]
“Brooklyn Mass Timber House,” world-architects.com, <https://www.world-architects.com/en/architecture-news/reviews/brooklyn-mass-timber-house>, Oct. 30, 2023, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]