IP Library Granted Patent US 12,697,491
Granted Patent B2
US 12,697,491 · App. 19/304,548 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

System and method for affecting porosity of tissue barriers, including blood brain barrier, and delivery of active agents

Inventors: Peter M. Bonutti (Manalapan, FL); Justin E. Beyers (Effingham, IL)
Assignee: Realeve, LLC
A61N1/36139A61N1/0548A61N1/36157A61N1/36171A61N1/36175
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,697,491
App. No.
19/304,548
Filed
Aug 19, 2025
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3796
USPC
607/62
Abstract

Systems, devices, and methods for modulating permeability of a membrane barrier (e.g., BBB), such as by increasing and/or decreasing porosity of the membrane barrier. The membrane barrier may be modulated indirectly through neuromodulation, which may include stimulation of an upstream neural body (e.g., a ganglion) that affects, either directly or indirectly, the permeability of the membrane barrier. Modulating a membrane barrier has uses in selective delivery of active agents or other substances through the membrane barrier into tissues or cells. In some situations, these active agents or other substances would not be able to pass through the barrier without modulation. Modulating a membrane barrier has uses in selective drainage of fluid, waste, and/or byproducts from the tissue or cells from one side of the membrane barrier, or reducing the porosity of the membrane barrier to correct a leaky barrier.

Claims (34)

1 . A method for controlling permeability of a blood-brain barrier in a subject, comprising:

measuring a predetermined parameter using a sensor to determine when an active agent is available in the subject for passing through the blood-brain barrier;

applying a first electrical stimulation to a sphenopalatine ganglion of the subject at a first frequency to selectively increase a porosity of the blood-brain barrier when the predetermined parameter indicates the active agent is available;

monitoring a physiological response of the subject; and

applying a second electrical stimulation to the sphenopalatine ganglion of the subject at a second frequency different than the first frequency to selectively decrease the porosity of the blood-brain barrier based on the monitored physiological response.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined parameter comprises at least one of time elapsed, delivered active agent dosage, active agent concentration in the body, change in active agent concentration, or change of concentration of a substance in blood of the patient indicating that the substance has passed through the blood-brain barrier.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the electrical stimulation to increase porosity comprises a frequency of 10 Hz to 40 Hz and a current of 0.1 to 3 mA.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the electrical stimulation to decrease porosity comprises a frequency of 60 Hz to 200 Hz and a current of 0.1 to 3 mA.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the electrical stimulation comprises a biphasic, charge-balanced waveform.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the biphasic waveform is amplitude modulated with a sinusoidal frequency.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the physiological response comprises transendothelial electrical resistance measurements to determine blood-brain barrier integrity.

8 . A system for modulating blood-brain barrier permeability of a subject, comprising:

an electrode assembly configured to deliver electrical stimulation to a sphenopalatine ganglion of the subject;

a sensor configured to monitor a predetermined parameter related to an active agent concentration in the subject; and

a controller, including a processor, configured to:

execute a machine learning algorithm to analyze sensor data received from the sensor and determine optimal stimulation parameters for the electrode assembly; and

automatically adjust the electrical stimulation delivered by the electrode assembly based on the optimal stimulation parameters determined by the machine learning algorithm analysis to selectively increase and decrease porosity of the blood-brain barrier.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the electrode assembly comprises an electrode body positioned medial to a zygoma on a posterior maxilla within a buccal fat pad of a cheek, and an electrode lead positioned within a pterygopalatine fossa in proximity to the sphenopalatine ganglion.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the electrode assembly further comprises a fixation apparatus configured to anchor to a zygomaticomaxillary buttress.

11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the sensor is configured to monitor a parameter comprising at least one of time elapsed, delivered active agent dosage, active agent concentration in the body, change in active agent concentration, or change of concentration of a substance in blood of the patient indicating that the substance has passed through the blood-brain barrier.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the controller is configured to automatically initiate electrical stimulation at a frequency of 10 Hz to 40 Hz to increase porosity of the blood-brain barrier when the predetermined parameter indicates an active agent is available for passing through the blood-brain barrier.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the controller is further configured to automatically adjust the electrical stimulation to a frequency of 60 Hz to 200 Hz to decrease porosity of the blood-brain barrier based on the machine learning algorithm analysis of the sensor data.

14 . A computer-implemented method for optimizing blood-brain barrier modulation of a subject using artificial intelligence, comprising:

receiving sensor data indicating a physiological parameter of the subject;

processing the sensor data using a machine learning algorithm to predict a stimulation parameter for increasing a permeability of the blood-brain barrier;

generating a first control signal for an electrode assembly based on the predicted stimulation parameter to increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier;

analyzing real-time feedback data from a feedback sensor to determine when to decrease the permeability of the blood-brain barrier; and

generating a second control signal for the electrode assembly based on the analysis of the real-time feedback data to decrease the permeability of the blood-brain barrier.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the machine learning algorithms comprise supervised learning algorithms trained using historical patient data to predict optimal amplitude, pulse width, or frequency parameters.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the machine learning algorithms further comprise reinforcement learning algorithms that systematically evaluate different parameter combinations and adapt based on observed outcomes.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the physiological parameters comprise tissue impedance measurements, neural response signals, heart rate variability, blood pressure variations, or electroencephalography signals.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 17 , wherein analyzing the real-time feedback data comprises processing transendothelial electrical resistance measurements to determine blood-brain barrier integrity.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the control signals comprise biphasic, charge-balanced waveforms with frequencies of 10 Hz to 40 Hz for opening the blood-brain barrier and frequencies of 60 Hz to 200 Hz for closing the blood-brain barrier.

20 . The computer-implemented method of claim 19 , wherein the biphasic waveforms are amplitude modulated with a sinusoidal frequency and the machine learning algorithms automatically adjust at least one of pulse width modulation, frequency modulation, or amplitude modulation to optimize blood-brain barrier permeability.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 23, 2025
From: BONUTTI, PETER M.
To: REALEVE, LLC
Reel/Frame 072651/0973 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Oct 23, 2025
From: BEYERS, JUSTIN E.
To: REALEVE, LLC
Reel/Frame 073227/0387 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63755763 · Feb 7, 2025
Provisional Application 63684560 · Aug 19, 2024
Related Publication 20260048264A1 · Feb 19, 2026
References Cited (118)
US 765731A · Hooton et al. · 1904 [cited by applicant]
US 6405079B1 · Ansarina · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6429217B1 · Levin · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6432986B2 · Levin · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6479523B1 · Puskas · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6491940B1 · Levin · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6526318B1 · Ansarinia · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6656960B2 · Puskas · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6778854B2 · Puskas · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6853858B2 · Shalev · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 6885888B2 · Rezai · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7117033B2 · Shalev et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7142910B2 · Puskas · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7310552B2 · Puskas · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7340299B2 · Puskas · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7477945B2 · Rezai et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7532938B2 · Machado et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7561919B2 · Shalev et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7636597B2 · Gross et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7684859B2 · Shalev et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7799337B2 · Levin · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7860569B2 · Solberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8010189B2 · Shalev · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8055347B2 · Lamensdorf · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8206369B2 · Ansarinia · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8229571B2 · Lorian et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8283793B2 · Pless · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8311632B2 · Pless et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8339262B2 · Pless · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8355779B2 · Ansarinia · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8394075B2 · Ansarinia · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8406869B2 · Lamensdorf et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8412336B2 · Pless et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8473062B2 · Pless · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8494641B2 · Boling et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8686858B2 · Pless · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8781574B2 · Pless et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8870773B2 · Narouze · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8954149B2 · Shalev · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8958881B2 · Lamensdorf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8983609B2 · Rezai et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9211133B2 · Papay · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9220524B2 · Boling et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9233245B2 · Lamensdorf et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9320908B2 · Fletcher et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9456836B2 · Boling et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9550057B2 · Papay et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US RE46307E · Ansarinia · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US RE46332E · Ansarinia · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9604057B2 · Caparso · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9607195B2 · Pless · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9610441B2 · Goodman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9662140B2 · Powell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9700721B2 · Goodman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9757572B2 · Boling et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9763581B2 · Bonutti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9861295B2 · Powell et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10058393B2 · Bonutti et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10068318B2 · Dzyubak et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10098662B2 · Boling et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10286213B2 · Boling et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10322279B2 · Papay · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11478641B2 · Luhrs et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11679263B2 · Hsu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11687800B2 · Bonutti et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11883665B2 · Hsu et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12070596B2 · Smyth · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12383735B2 · Bonutti et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
US 12544569B2 · Bonutti et al. · 2026 [cited by applicant]
US 20020008723A1 · Wen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040015068A1 · Shalev et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050074506A1 · Natan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050266099A1 · Shalev · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060020299A1 · Shalev · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090210026A1 · Solberg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299418A1 · Shalev et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100274313A1 · Boling et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120253261A1 · Poletto et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130184803A1 · Altman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130304141A1 · Goodman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150174406A1 · Lamensdorf · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160151646A1 · Bonutti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190336073A1 · Kirkup et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210178154A1 · Bonutti et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210401507A1 · Stylos et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220101999A1 · Bonutti et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230233858A1 · Minar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240065550A1 · Conner · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240359005A1 · Bonutti et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 113368386A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 116930614A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004010923A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2025106975A1 · 2025 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for for PCT Application No. PCT/US2025/042653, Oct. 16, 2025, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Alahmari, A., Blood-Brain Barrier Overview: Structural and Functional Correlation, Hindawi Neural Plasticity vol. 2021, Article ID 6564585, Dec. 6, 2021, 10 pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6564585. [cited by applicant]
Bornstein, MD, et al., Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation to Augment Cerebral Blood Flow a Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trail vol. 50, No. 8, May 23, 2019, 17 pages, Stroke https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024582. [cited by applicant]
Biose et al., Promising Cerebral Blood Flow Enhancers in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Transl. Stroke Res., vol. 14, pp. 863-889, (2023) Nov. 17, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-022-01100-w. [cited by applicant]
Feigin et al., World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022, International Journal of Stroke, Jan. 5, 2022, pp. 18-29, vol. 17—Issue 1, World Stroke Organization. [cited by applicant]
Goadsby Md, P., et al., Safety and Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for chronic cluster headache: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, Lancet Neurology, Dec. 2019, pp. 1081-1090, vol. 18, Issue 12… [cited by applicant]
Hosseini et al, Mechanisms of action of acute and subacute sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for ischemic stroke, International Journal of Stroke, Apr. 23, 2020, vol. 15(8) 839-848, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10… [cited by applicant]
Khurana et al. Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial-1 (ImpACT-1). A single-arm feasibility study evaluating the safety and potential benefit of the Ischemic Stroke System for treatment of acute ischemic… [cited by applicant]
Lang, Md et al., 155 Enhanced Stem Cell Delivery by Functional Blood-Brain Barrier Modulation Improves Neurological Recovery in a Rodent Stroke Model, Neurosurgery, vol. 63, pp. 162-163, Aug. 2016, https://doi.org/10.12… [cited by applicant]
Levi et al., Stimulation of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion Induces Reperfusion and Blood-Brain Barrier Protection in the Photothrombotic Stroke, Jun. 22, 2012, 10 pages, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039636. [cited by applicant]
Mordor Intelligence, Neurodegenerative Disease Market Size & Share Analysis—Growth Trends & Forecasts (2024-2029) 7 pp. Jan. 29, 2024, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/neurodegenerative-disease-marke. [cited by applicant]
Powell et al., The Potential Role of Neuromodulation in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface, Dec. 2, 2022, pp. 1215-1226, vol. 25—Issue 8, Elsevier Inc. [cited by applicant]
Puris, E. et al., Targeting Transporter for Drug Delivery to the Brain: Can we do Better?, Mar. 31, 2022, 41 pages, Pharmaceutical Research (2002) 39:1415-1455. [cited by applicant]
Saver, Md, et al., Refined Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulator Placement and Intensity Setting to Augment Blood Flow and Neurologic Function, Stroke, vol. 50, No. 12, Nov. 19, 2019, https://doi. org/10.1161/ STROKEAHA.11… [cited by applicant]
Schmidt et al., Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation is a Reversible and Frequency-Dependent Modulator of the Blood-Brain Barrier, Apr. 26, 2019, Brain Research 1718, pp. 231-241, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2019.… [cited by applicant]
Schoenen et al., Stimulation of the Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH 1: a randomized sham-controlled study, Cephalalia an International Journal of Headache, vol. 33, Issue 10, pp.… [cited by applicant]
Stamatovic et al., Junctional proteins of the blood-brain barrier: New insights into function and dysfunction, Jan., Feb., Mar. 2016, 12 pages, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. [cited by applicant]
Stricsek Md et al., 221 Functional Modulation of the Blood Brain Barrier, Neurosurgery, vol. 64, Issue CN suppl. 1, p. 260, Sep. 1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx417.221. [cited by applicant]
Stroke Management Market Poised to Surge from $36.94 Billion to $39.00 Billion in 2024, Jan. 28, 2028, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stroke-management-market-poised-surge-005600586.html, Research and Markets, Dublin. [cited by applicant]
Tamayo et al., Regulation of Blood Flow in the Cerebral Posterior Circulation by Parasympathetic Nerve Fibers: Physiological Background and Possible Clinical Implications in Patients with Vertebrobasilar Stroke, Front. … [cited by applicant]
Tepper et al., Acute Treatment of Intractable Migraine with Sphenopalatine Ganglion Electrical Stimulation, Jul. 6, 2009, American Headache Society, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01451.x. [cited by applicant]
Theofanis, Md, et al. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation Upregulates Transport of Intra-Arterial Temozolomide Across the Blood-Brain Barrier, Neurosurgery, 66(Supplement_1):p. 310-151, Sep. 2019, https://doi.org/10.109… [cited by applicant]
Thiel et al., Forumm Mini-Review, Nitric Oxide and Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity, Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 273-278, (2001), Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. [cited by applicant]
Yarnitsky, et al., Blood-brain barrier opened by stimulation of the parasympathetic sphenopalatine ganglion: a new method for macromolecule delivery to the brain, J Neurosurg. 101:303-309, Aug. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Yarnitsky et al., Increased BBB permeability by parasympathetic sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation in dogs—ScienceDirect, Brain Research, vol. 1018, Issue 2, pp. 236-240, Aug. 27, 2024. [cited by applicant]