IP Library Granted Patent US 12,699,698
Granted Patent B2
US 12,699,698 · App. 18/061,416 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

Product logistics system for autonomous replacement

Inventors: Charles H. Cella (Pembroke, MA); Andrew Cardno (San Diego, CA); Benjamin D. Goodman (Los Angeles, CA); Hristo Malchev (Alta Loma, CA)
Assignee: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
G06F16/2455G05D1/0291G05D1/69G06F16/182G06F16/24537G06F16/24544G06F16/24552G06F16/2456G06F16/2462G06F16/2471G06F16/27G06F16/278G06Q10/06315G06Q10/0833G06Q10/087G06Q20/389G06Q30/0202G06Q30/0206G06V10/774H04N23/675G05B2219/49023G06Q2220/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,699,698
App. No.
18/061,416
Filed
Dec 2, 2022
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3627
USPC
705/28
Abstract

A system for product replacement includes a product logistics system for a product in a product condition. The system includes an exposure data collection system configured to collect exposure data indicating at least one of an event or an environmental condition that may impact the product condition of the product. The system includes a replacement determination system programmed to calculate a probability for the need to replace the product based on the at least one of the event or the environmental condition. The system includes a replacement procurement system programmed to autonomously configure an option-type futures contract for replacement of the product based on the probability for the need to replace the product.

Claims (35)

1 . A system for product replacement, comprising:

a product logistics system comprising:

a plurality of environmental sensors disposed near at least one of a product or a transport vehicle and configured to monitor one or more environmental parameters during product transport;

an exposure data collection system configured to collect exposure data from the plurality of environmental sensors during the product transport; and

a product assessment system configured to determine a product condition using an artificial intelligence (AI) system with a machine learned model, that is trained on one or more historical data sets correlating environmental exposure conditions with product replacement outcomes, and the collected exposure data during the product transport;

a replacement determination system programmed to calculate a probability for a need to replace the product based on the determined product condition;

a robotic process automation (RPA) system trained to autonomously execute contract configuration operations based on the calculated probability;

a replacement procurement system programmed to autonomously configure, via the robotic process automation (RPA) system, an option-type futures contract for replacement of the product based on the calculated probability for the need to replace the product, wherein the option-type futures contract is configured while the product is still in transport; and

a smart contract system programmed to autonomously configure, via the robotic process automation (RPA) system, a smart contract to secure replacement of the product based on the option-type futures contract, wherein the smart contract system configures the smart contract to have a duration of option based on estimating a time until delivery completion.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the calculated probability for the need to replace the product includes calculating a probability of catastrophic loss, and wherein the smart contract system configures the smart contract to have the duration of option further based on the probability of catastrophic loss.

3 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a replacement alternatives system programmed to configure an alternative smart contract that offers alternatives to replacement of the product to at least one of: a purchaser of, an owner of, or an insurer with a security interest in the product.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the replacement alternatives system is programmed to configure the alternative smart contract that offers at least one of: a refund of a purchase price of the product, alternative goods or services, or incentives to accept a delayed delivery of the product.

5 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a future price renegotiation system programmed to renegotiate a set of future prices based on a current market state and on the exposure data.

6 . The system of claim 5 , wherein the future price renegotiation system is further programmed to renegotiate the set of future prices in response to the exposure data indicating a likelihood of widespread supply chain disruptions for goods or services associated with the product.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the AI system is trained to predict an impact of the need for replacement based on at least one of: an impact of delays or reduced supply on pricing.

8 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a digital twin system configured to create a product digital twin of the product.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the product digital twin is used to simulate an impact of the exposure data on the product.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the machine learned model is trained prior to deployment in the product assessment system using training examples including historical environmental exposure data during product transport and corresponding historical product replacement determinations.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more environmental parameters monitored by the plurality of environmental sensors include at least one of: a temperature parameter, a humidity parameter, a pressure parameter, a vibration parameter, or a shock parameter.

12 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a digital twin system configured to create a product digital twin of the product and simulate an impact of the exposure data on the product condition using the product digital twin.

13 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the robotic process automation (RPA) system is trained on a training set including expert procurement professional interactions with contract configuration tasks.

14 . A computerized method for product replacement of a product in a product condition, the computerized method comprising:

training a machine learned model on one or more historical data sets correlating environmental exposure conditions with product replacement outcomes;

collecting exposure data during a product transport from a plurality of environmental sensors disposed near at least one of the product or a transport vehicle and configured to monitor one or more environmental parameters;

determining the product condition using an artificial intelligence system with the machine learned model and the collected exposure data during the product transport;

calculating a probability for a need to replace the product based on the determined product condition;

utilizing a robotic process automation (RPA) system that has been trained to autonomously execute contract configuration operations based on the calculated probability;

autonomously configuring, via the robotic process automation (RPA) system and while the product is still in transport, an option-type futures contract for replacement of the product based on the calculated probability for the need to replace the product; and

autonomously configuring, via the robotic process automation (RPA) system, a smart contract to secure replacement of the product based on the option-type futures contract, wherein the smart contract is configured to have a duration of option based on estimating a time until delivery completion.

15 . The computerized method of claim 14 , wherein the configuring the smart contract includes configuring the smart contract to have the duration of option further based on a probability of catastrophic loss indicated by the probability for the need to replace the product.

16 . The computerized method of claim 14 , further comprising configuring an alternative smart contract that offers alternatives to replacement of the product to at least one of: a purchaser of, an owner of, or an insurer with a security interest in the product.

17 . The computerized method of claim 16 , wherein the configuring the alternative smart contract includes configuring the alternative smart contract that offers at least one of: a refund of a purchase price of the product, alternative goods or services, or incentives to accept a delayed delivery of the product.

18 . The computerized method of claim 14 , further comprising creating a product digital twin of the product.

19 . The computerized method of claim 18 , further comprising simulating an impact of the exposure data on the product using the product digital twin.

20 . The computerized method of claim 14 , wherein the calculating the probability for the need to replace the product is further based on at least one factor of: duration of exposure to the environmental condition, severity of the environmental condition relative to product tolerance thresholds, or historical replacement rates for products exposed to similar environmental conditions.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2022
From: CELLA, CHARLES H.; CARDNO, ANDREW; GOODMAN, BENJAMIN D.; MALCHEV, HRISTO
To: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
Reel/Frame 062185/0947 →
Priority Claims (1)
IN 202211008709 · Feb 18, 2022 · national
Continuity (6)
Continuation PCTUS2022028633 · May 10, 2022
Provisional Application 63302013 · Jan 21, 2022
Provisional Application 63299710 · Jan 14, 2022
Provisional Application 63282507 · Nov 23, 2021
Provisional Application 63187325 · May 11, 2021
Related Publication 20230137578A1 · May 4, 2023
References Cited (103)
US 6985877B1 · Hayward · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8131581B1 · Pang · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8156022B2 · Fell · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 10642847B1 · Nerurkar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030171963A1 · Kurihara et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20080009968A1 · Bruemmer · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20140365258A1 · Vestal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150378807A1 · Ball et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160203407A1 · Sasaki et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160236867A1 · Brazeau et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170032281A1 · Hsu · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170057081A1 · Krohne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180004202A1 · Onaga · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180136633A1 · Small et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190028276A1 · Pierce et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102850A1 · Wheeler · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190130425A1 · Lei · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138662A1 · Deutsch et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190278527A1 · Yeung et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190317935A1 · Berti et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190325044A1 · Gray · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190347358A1 · Mishra et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200019935A1 · Jan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200104730A1 · Strong · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200111092A1 · Wood et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200118131A1 · Diriye et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200150687A1 · Halder · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200160288A1 · Bauerschmidt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200175531A1 · Ma · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184558A1 · Crumb · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184559A1 · Crumb et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184560A1 · Crumb et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200184565A1 · Crumb et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200193449A1 · Crumb et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200210966A1 · Nuthi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200211092A1 · Sarin · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200258031A1 · Makhija · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200294142A1 · Edkins et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200356871A1 · Mueller · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200372104A1 · Calix · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210110342A1 · Blackburn et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210117910A1 · Koc · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210118166A1 · Temblay et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133669A1 · Cella et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210138656A1 · Gothoskar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210178575A1 · Riek et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210256442A1 · Ashish · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210264553A1 · Gajnutdinov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210358035A1 · Patel · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210383523A1 · Simson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220076174A1 · Alabdulkarim · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220108308A1 · Hanebeck · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220122173A1 · Lopatin · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220138852A1 · Huchedé · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220261905A1 · Gorham · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220271956A1 · Hung · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220301055A1 · Beddis · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230015846A1 · Toffey · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230050430A1 · Piau · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CA 3118308A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 104036007A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008299579A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
KR 20140054897A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014015492A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018172593A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020142499A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019070644A2 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Fryer et al., “Configuring robots from modules: an object oriented approach”, Advanced Robotics, 1997. ICAR '97. Proceedings., 8th International Conference on Monterey, CA, USA Jul. 7-9, 1997, New York, NY, USA,IEEE, US… [cited by applicant]
Craye et al., “BioVision: A Biomimetics Platform for Intrinsically Motivated Visual Saliency Learning”, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, IEEE, vol. 11, No. 3, Sep. 1, 2019, ISSN 2379-8920, pp. 3… [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “Datasheet: EL-10-30-Series Fast Electrically Tunable Lens Electrical specifications”, OptoTune, Dec. 10, 2019, pp. 1-16, URL: /https://prologoptics.com/wp-content/uploads/OptotuneEL-10-30.pdf. [cited by applicant]
Kiviat, Trevor, “‘Smart’ Contract Markets: Trading Derivatives Contracts on the Blockchain”, Apr. 2015, URL: https://www.academia.edu/10766594/Smart_Contract_Markets_Trading_Derivatives_on_the_Blockchain. [cited by applicant]
Wise et al., “Legal smart contracts for derivative trading in mining”, Knowledge Engineering Review., Cambridge University Press, vol. 35, Jan. 1, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bterrell Group, “RPA's role in automation in finance for midmarket financial services companies”, Sep. 28, 2020, URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20200928211033/https://www.bterrell.com/robotic-process.automation-rpa/fi… [cited by applicant]
Sharma, “What Happens when RPA and Blockchain Work Together?”, Blockchain Council, Jun. 12, 2020, URL: https://www.blockchain-council.org/blockchain/what-happens-when-rpa-and-blockchain-work-together/. [cited by applicant]
Harvest Public Media, “Futures Market Explained”, Youtube, May 25, 2016, URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC9VeHr13Es. [cited by applicant]
Wilson, “Accenture: building suply chain resilience amidst COVID-19”, Supply Chain Magazine, May 17, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schatteman, “Supply Chain Lessons from Covid-19: Time to Refocus on Resilience”, Bain & Company, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ganeriwalla et al., “Three Paths to Advantage with Digital Supply Chains”, BCG Perspectives, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Deloitte, “Digital Technologies Dirve Supply Chain Innovation”, CIO Journal, Sep. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Kelly et al., “Supply chains and value webs”, Deloitte University Press, 2015. [cited by applicant]
IW Staff, “75% of Companies in ISM Virus Survey Report Supply Chain Disruptions”, Industry Week, Mar. 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
MHI Deloitte, “8. 2019 MHI Annual Industry Report: Elevating Supply Chain Digital Consciousness”, 2019. [cited by applicant]
PwC, “PwC's COVID-19 CFO Pulse”, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
CB Insights, “Supply Chain & Logistics Tech in Numbers” Powerpoint presentation, Jul. 2020. [cited by applicant]
O'Leary, “The Modern Supply Chain is Snapping”, The Atlantic, Mar. 19, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bukova et al., “The Position of Industry 4.0 in the Worldwide Logistics Chain”, LOGI—Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, vol. 9, No. 1, 2018, pp. 18-23. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Here's how global supply chains will change after COVID-19”, World Economic Forum, May 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ferrantino et al., “Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains”, Apr. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “AI Set to Drive Global Supply Chain Technology Market to $440 Billion by 2023”, ABI Research, Jan. 29, 2019. [cited by applicant]
WIPO, International Search Report for PCT/US2022/028633, issued Sep. 23, 2022. [cited by applicant]
WIPO, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2022/028633, issued Sep. 23, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Jangir, Sandip, et al. “A novel framework for pharmaceutical supply chain management using distributed ledger and smart contracts.” 2019 10th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technolog… [cited by applicant]
Daian, Philip, et al. “Flash boys 2.0: Frontrunning, transaction reordering, and consensus instability in decentralized exchanges.” Apr. 10, 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05234. [cited by applicant]
Liao, Chia-Hung, Hui-En Lin, and Shyan-Ming Yuan. “Blockchain-enabled integrated market platform for contract production.” IEEE Access 8 (2020): 211007-211027. [cited by applicant]
Kiviat, Trevor I. ““Smart” Contract Markets: Trading Derivatives Contracts On the Blockchain.” (2015). [cited by applicant]
Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, and Marco Zuppiroli. Commodity futures markets: are they an effective price risk management tool for the European wheat supply chain ?. No. 1052-2016-85898. 2013. [cited by applicant]
Wall, Eric, and Gustaf Malm. “Using blockchain technology and smart contracts to create a distributed securities depository.” Jun. 29, 2016. (2016). [cited by applicant]
Fontem, Belleh, and Megan Price. “Joint client selection and contract design for a risk-averse commodity broker in a two-echelon supply chain.” Oct. 15, 2021. Annals of Operations Research 307 (2021): 111-138. [cited by applicant]
Manish Grover, “How Daml can complement Robotic Process Automation (RPA),” Nov. 3, 2020, Digital Asset. [cited by applicant]
Eggers, Julia, et al. “Process automation on the blockchain: an exploratory case study on smart contracts,” 2021. [cited by applicant]
Howells, “How the network economy is revolutionizing supply chains,” World Economic Forum, Jan. 14, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Nair, Price discovery and pairs trading potentials: the case of metals markets, Journal of Financial Economic Policy 13.5, 565-586 (2021) (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for EP app. No. 22808223.6, dated Apr. 8, 2025. [cited by applicant]