IP Library Granted Patent US 12,705,679
Granted Patent B2
US 12,705,679 · App. 18/091,208 · Granted Aug 11, 2026

Machine learning models for patent valuation

Inventors: David Hwei-Yu Hsu (Philadelphia, PA); Prasanna Tambe (Wynnewood, PA); Dokyun Lee (Englewood Cliffs, NJ)
Assignees: The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania; Carnegie Mellon University
G06Q50/184G06N3/0442G06N3/0464G06N3/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,705,679
App. No.
18/091,208
Filed
Dec 29, 2022
Granted
Aug 11, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3626
USPC
705/310
Abstract

Methods, systems, and computer readable media for using machine learning models to determine predicted values of patent documents. In some examples, a method includes training, by at least one processor, a machine learning model to predict patent value based on unstructured text from training patents and, for each training patent, a measure of patent value. The method includes supplying, by the at least one processor, unstructured text from a patent document to the machine learning model. The method includes outputting, by the at least one processor, a predicted measure of value of the patent document.

Claims (23)

1 . A method comprising:

training, by at least one processor, a machine learning model to predict patent value based on unstructured text from a plurality of training patents and, for each training patent, a measure of patent value, wherein training the machine learning model includes creating a vocabulary of tokens corresponding to words that appear at least a predetermined number of times in the training patents, creating, using a pretrained embedding model and for a predetermined number of the tokens created from the summary section of each of the training patents, word embeddings for the summary section of each of the training patents and providing the word embeddings for the summary section of each of the training patents as input to the machine learning model, wherein the machine learning model comprises a plurality of convolutional neural network (CNN) layers, the machine learning model comprises a bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM) network configured for tracking local-level features extracted by the CNN layers, and the machine learning model comprises a multi-layer perceptron layer with an activation function to produce a final patent representation from the bidirectional LSTM network;

supplying, by the at least one processor and to the machine learning model, unstructured text from a summary section of a patent document; and

outputting, by the at least one processor, a predicted measure of value of the patent document.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein training the machine learning model comprises determining the measure of patent value for each training patent based on one or more market reactions to firm patent grants.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicted measure of value of the patent document is a predicted measure of economic value to be assigned to the patent document by a market for patents or firms.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predicted measure of value of the patent document is a predicted number of forward citations for the patent document.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning model is a deep learning model configured to use natural language processing on the unstructured text.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the patent document comprises a patent, patent application, or patent application publication.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein training the machine learning model comprises further training the machine learning model using structured data from the training patents.

8 . A system comprising:

at least one processor; and

a machine learning model implemented and trained by the at least one processor to predict patent value based on unstructured text from a plurality of training patents and, for each training patent, a measure of patent value, wherein training the machine learning model includes creating a vocabulary of tokens corresponding to words that appear at least a predetermined number of times in a summary section of each of the training patents, creating, using a pretrained embedding model and for a predetermined number of the tokens created from the summary section of each of the training patents, word embeddings for the summary section of each of the training patents and providing the word embeddings for the summary section of each of the training patents as input to the machine learning model, wherein the machine learning model comprises a plurality of convolutional neural network (CNN) layers, the machine learning model comprises a bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM) network configured for tracking local-level features extracted by the CNN layers, and the machine learning model comprises a multi-layer perceptron layer with an activation function to produce a final patent representation from the bidirectional LSTM network;

the machine learning model being supplied, by the at least one processor, with unstructured text from a summary section of a patent document to and outputting a predicted measure of value of the patent document.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein training the machine learning model comprises determining the measure of patent value for each training patent based on one or more market reactions to firm patent grants.

10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the predicted measure of value of the patent document is a predicted measure of economic value to be assigned to the patent document by a market for patents or firms.

11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the predicted measure of value of the patent document is a predicted number of forward citations for the patent document.

12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the machine learning model is a deep learning model configured to use natural language processing on the unstructured text.

13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein training the machine learning model comprises further training the machine learning model using structured data from the training patents.

14 . A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions hat when executed by a processor of a computer controls the computer to perform steps comprising

training, by the at least one processor, a machine learning model to predict patent value based on unstructured text from a plurality of training patents and, for each training patent, a measure of patent value, wherein training the machine learning model includes creating a vocabulary of tokens corresponding to words that appear at least a predetermined number of times in a summary section of each of the training patents, creating, using a pretrained embedding model and for a predetermined number of the tokens created from the summary section of each of the training patents, word embeddings for the summary section of each of the training patents, and providing the v word embeddings for the summary section of each of the training patents as input to the machine learning model, wherein the machine learning model comprises a plurality of convolutional neural network (CNN) layers, the machine learning model comprises a bidirectional long short-term memory (LSTM) network configured for tracking local-level features extracted by the CNN layers, and the machine learning model comprises a multi-layer perceptron layer with an activation function to produce a final patent representation from the bidirectional LSTM network;

supplying, by at least one processor and to the machine learning model, unstructured text from a summary section of a patent document; and

outputting, by the at least one processor, a predicted measure of value of the patent document.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2023
From: HSU, DAVID HWEI-YU; TAMBE, PRASANN
To: THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Reel/Frame 063048/0177 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2023
From: LEE, DOKYUN
To: CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 063048/0194 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63294950 · Dec 30, 2021
Related Publication 20240037683A1 · Feb 1, 2024
References Cited (82)
US 7657476B2 · Barney · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7840460B2 · Williams · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8161049B2 · Williams · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 9177349B2 · Barney · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9251243B2 · Stec · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10839156B1 · Saxena · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11436529B1 · Londeree · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 12191003B2 · Martin · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20070294232A1 · Gibbs · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20170109848A1 · Bufe, III · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180293678A1 · Shanahan · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200065384A1 · Costello · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200226288A1 · Zhang · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200257963A1 · Abhinav · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210034707A1 · Podgorny · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210157983A1 · Kalluri · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210240334A1 · Brockman · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210360001A1 · Proper · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220188950A1 · Gschwendtner · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220247866A1 · Xiao-Devins · 2022 [cited by examiner]
KR 101255181B1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
KR 20130125119A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
KR 101771634B1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
KR 20180086084A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014092369A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014135616A1 · 2014 [cited by examiner]
Hsu, David H., and Rosemarie H. Ziedonis. “Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial-firm patents.” Strategic Management Journal 34.7 (2013): 761-781. (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Hsu, David H., and Rosemarie H. Ziedonis. “Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures.” Academy of management proceedings. vol. 2008. No. 1. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management, 2008. (Year: 2… [cited by examiner]
Hsu, David H., et al. “Benchmarking US university patent value and commercialization efforts: A new approach.” Research Policy 50.1 (2021): 104076. (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Hall, Bronwyn H., Adam B. Jaffe, and Manuel Trajtenberg. “Market value and patent citations: A first look.” (2000). (Year: 2000). [cited by examiner]
Noh, Heeyong, and Sungjoo Lee. “Forecasting forward patent citations: comparison of citation-lag distribution, tobit regression, and deep learning approaches.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 69.4 (2020): 11… [cited by examiner]
Kim, Mirae, and Youngjung Geum. “Predicting patent transactions using patent-based machine learning techniques.” IEEE Access 8 (2020): 188833-188843. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Eom, Haneul, Sungyun Choi, and Sang Ok Choi. “Marketable value estimation of patents using ensemble learning methodology: Focusing on US patents for the electricity sector.” Plos one 16.9 (2021): e0257086. (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]
Chung, Park, and So Young Sohn. “Early detection of valuable patents using a deep learning model: Case of semiconductor industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 158 (2020): 120146. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Abrams, D. S., Akcigit, U., & Grennan, J. (2013). Patent value and citations:Creative destruction or strategic disruption? (No. w19647). National Bureau of Economic Research. [cited by applicant]
Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2007). The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 599-623. [cited by applicant]
Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics.Research Policy, 3 7( 5), 932-945. [cited by applicant]
Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2017). Enriching word vectors with subword information. Transactions of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics, 5 , 135-146. [cited by applicant]
Cockburn, I., & Griliches, Z. (1988). Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Market's Valuation of R&D and Patents. The American Economic Review, 78(2), 419-423. [cited by applicant]
Cohen, W. (2010). “Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance,” in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation vol. 1, B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, eds., pp. 129-213. [cited by applicant]
Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32. [cited by applicant]
Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805. [cited by applicant]
Einav, L., & Levin, J. (2014). Economics in the age of big data. Science, 3 46(6210), 1243089. [cited by applicant]
Fitzgerald, T., Balsmeier, B., Fleming, L., & Manso, G. (2019). Innovation search strategy and predictable returns. Management Science, forthcoming. [cited by applicant]
Galasso, A., & Schankerman, M. (2010). Patent thickets, courts, and the market for innovation. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 472-503. [cited by applicant]
Galasso, A., Schankerman, M., & Serrano C. J. (2013). Trading and enforcing patent rights. The RAND Journal of Economics , 44(2), 275-312. [cited by applicant]
Gentzkow, M., Kelly, B., & Taddy, M. (2019). Text as data. Journal of Economic Literature, 5 7( 3), 535-74. [cited by applicant]
Griliches, Z. (1981). Market value, R&D, and patents. Economics Letters, 7, 183-167. [cited by applicant]
Griliches, Z. (1998). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. In R &D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, Z. Griliches, editor, University of Chicago Press, 287-343. [cited by applicant]
Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., & Taddy, M. (2019). Measuring Group Differences in High-Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech. Econometrica, 87( 4), 1307-1340. [cited by applicant]
Guellec, D., & de l a Potterie, B. V. P. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics letters, 6 9( 1), 109-114. [cited by applicant]
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (No. w8498). National Bureau of Economic Research. [cited by applicant]
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of economics, 16-38. [cited by applicant]
Hansen, S., McMahon, M., & Prat, A. (2018). Transparency and deliberation within the FOMC: a computational linguistics approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1 33(2), 801-870. [cited by applicant]
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 8 1( 3), 511-515. [cited by applicant]
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8): 1343-1363. [cited by applicant]
Hasan, M. A., Spangler, W. S., Griffin, T., & Alba, A. (Jun. 2009). Coa: Finding novel patents through text analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining… [cited by applicant]
Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P. H., & Li, D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3), 632-654. [cited by applicant]
Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P. H., & Li, D. (2018). Innovative originality, profitability, and stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(7), 2553-2605. [cited by applicant]
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598. [cited by applicant]
Kamien, M. I. & Schwartz, N. L. (1975). Market structure and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 13, 1-37. [cited by applicant]
Kelly, B., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Taddy, M. (forthcoming). Measuring technological innovation over the long run. American Economic Review Insights. [cited by applicant]
Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1 32( 2), 665-712. [cited by applicant]
Kuhn, J. M. & Thompson, N. C. (2019). How to measure and draw causal inferences with patent scope. International Journal of the Economics of Business. 26(1), 5-38. [cited by applicant]
Lach, S., & Schankerman, M. (2008). Incentives and inventions in universities. The RAND Journal of Economics, 39(2), 403-433. [cited by applicant]
Lanjouw, J. O. (1998). Patent protection in the shadow of infringement: Simulation of patent value. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(4), 671-710. [cited by applicant]
Lanjouw, J. O., Pakes, A., Putnam, J. (1998). How to count patents and value intellectual property: the uses of patent renewal and application data. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(4), 405-432. [cited by applicant]
Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. The RAND Journal of Economics, 319-333. [cited by applicant]
Li, G. C., Lai, R., D'Amour, A., Doolin, D. M., Sun, Y., Torvik, V. I., . . . & Fleming, L. (2014). Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975-2010). Research Policy, 43(6), 941-9… [cited by applicant]
Marco, A. C., Myers, A., Graham, S. J., D'Agostino, P., & Apple, K. (2015). The USPTO patent assignment dataset: Descriptions and analysis. [cited by applicant]
Pakes, A. (1985). On patents, R & D, and the stock market rate of return. Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 390-409. [cited by applicant]
Peters, M. E., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018). Deep contextualized word representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05365. [cited by applicant]
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (Oct. 2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) (pp. 1532-1543). [cited by applicant]
Reitzig, M. (2003). What determines patent value?: Insights from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 3 2( 1), 13-26. [cited by applicant]
Rücklé, A., Eger, S., Peyrard, M., & Gurevych, I. (2018). Concatenated power mean word embeddings as universal cross-lingual sentence representations. a rXiv preprint arXiv:1803.01400. [cited by applicant]
Sampat, B. N., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2004). Patent citations and the economic value of patents. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 277-298). Springer, Dordrecht. [cited by applicant]
Schankerman, M. (1998). How valuable is patent protection? Estimates by technology field. The RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 77-107. [cited by applicant]
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187. [cited by applicant]
Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109-124. [cited by applicant]
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90-104. [cited by applicant]
Van Zeebroeck, N., & Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2011). The vulnerability of patent value determinants. Economics of nnovation and new technology, 20(3). [cited by applicant]
Ziedonis, R. H. (2004). Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science, 50(6), 804-820. [cited by applicant]