IP Library Granted Patent US 6,931,382
Granted Patent B2
US 6,931,382 · App. 09/791,387 · Granted Aug 16, 2005

Payment instrument authorization technique

Assignee: CDCK Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,931,382
App. No.
09/791,387
Granted
Aug 16, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method is provided for protecting a payment instrument in non-face-to-face transactions. The payment instrument is issued by an issuing entity and associated with an authorized instrument holder. The authorized instrument holder is subject to authentication by a trusted third party with whom the payment instrument holder has previously registered. The method includes: the authorized instrument holder communicating with the issuing entity to block, on a default basis, authorization of the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions unless authorized to unblock the payment instrument by the trusted third party; prior to a non-face-to-face transaction, the authorized instrument holder communicating with the trusted third party to subject him or herself to authentication and to request that the payment instrument be unblocked; and the trusted third party authenticating the authorized instrument holder, and if the authentication result is positive, communicating with the issuing entity to request unblocking of the payment instrument.

Claims (20)

1. A method of protecting a payment instrument in non-face-to-face transactions, the payment instrument being issued by an issuing entity and associated with an authorized instrument holder, the authorized instrument holder being subject to authentication by a trusted third party with whom the payment instrument holder has previously registered, the method comprising:

the authorized instrument holder communicating with the issuing entity to block, on a default basis, authorization of the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions;

prior to a non-face-to-face transaction, the authorized instrument holder communicating with the trusted third party to subject him or herself to authentication and to request that the payment instrument be unblocked for non-face-to-face transactions; and

the trusted third party authenticating the authorized instrument holder, and if the authentication result is positive, communicating with the issuing entity to store the request to unblock the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein, the issuing entity retrieves and enforces the unblocking request from the trusted third party, and the non-face-to-face transaction is a transaction with a merchant and further comprising the step of the issuing entity forwarding a payment authorization response to the merchant in response to receipt of a request for authorization from the merchant.

3. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the customer has previously blocked use of the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions on a default basis and the trusted third party is further adapted to receive a request from the customer to unblock use of the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions, the method further comprising the steps of:

using a satellite computer system, associated with the trusted third party and located in proximity to an issuing entity of the payment instrument, the satellite computer system being adapted to communicate with the issuing entity to store the unblock request for the payment instrument account for non-face-to-face transactions in response to a request from the trusted third party computer system to unblock the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions, the request being made by the trusted third party computer system upon successful authentication by the trusted third party computer system of the identity of the customer as an authorized user of the payment instrument.

4. A method according to claim 3 , wherein the customer has previously blocked use of the payment instrument only in non-face-to-face transactions.

5. A method of protecting a payment instrument in non-face-to-face transactions, the payment instrument being issued by an issuing entity and associated with an authorized instrument holder, the authorized instrument holder being subject to authentication by an authentication function, the method comprising:

the authorized instrument holder communicating with the issuing entity to block, on a default basis, authorization of the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions;

prior to a non-face-to-face transaction, the authorized instrument holder communicating with an authentication function to subject him or herself to authentication and to request that the payment instrument be unblocked for non-face-to-face transactions; and

the authentication function authenticating the authorized instrument holder, and if the authentication result is positive, causing the issuing entity to store the request to unblock the payment instrument for non-face-to-face transactions.

6. A method of protecting a payment instrument used in transactions, the payment instrument being issued by an issuing entity and associated with an authorized instrument holder, the authorized instrument holder being subject to authentication by an authentication function, the method comprising:

blocking the authorization for a payment instrument, on a default basis, by the issuing entity;

communicating by the authorized instrument holder, prior to a transaction or multiple transactions, with an authentication function to subject the authorized instrument holder to authentication and to request that the payment instrument be unblocked for future payment authorizations; and

authenticating the authorized instrument holder, and if the authentication result is positive, causing the issuing entity to store the request to unblock the payment instrument for the authorization of payments for the transaction or transactions.

7. A method of claim 6 further comprising a set of conditions set by the instrument holder after successful authentication which must be met before the issuer authorizes the payment instrument for a particular transaction or series of transactions, the conditions being one or more of the following: the transactions are equal to or less than a certain amount total, either individually or collectively; the transaction(s) are in a geographic location or locations where the transaction(s) may take place; the transaction(s) take place on a date that is after a set start date and before a set end date; the transaction(s) are such that the card must be present; the transaction(s) are such that the card is not present.

8. A method of claim 6 further comprising the authorized instrument holder communicating with the authentication function through one of the following methods: by using an application program running locally on the authorized instrument holder's computer or portable computing device which communicates with the authentication function over a network or dial-up connection; by using an application program accessible through the web; by using an application program in conjunction with a storage medium in the possession of the authorized instrument holder, the storage medium storing encrypted personal information; by using the telephone to dial into an automated response system; by contacting a call center or customer service center.

9. A method of claim 6 further comprising notification to the authorized instrument holder of the current status of the payment instrument using one or more of the following means: email; voice notification through a telephone line; a short message signal sent to a pager or mobile phone; through an application program running locally on the authorized instrument holder's computer or portable computing device; through an application program accessible through the web; by contact with a call center or customer service center.

10. A method of claim 6 further comprising a means for the payment instrument holder or a merchant involved in a transaction to view the transaction details including the authorization status of the payment instrument at the time of the transaction.

Assignments (13)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 3, 2020
From: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 153 LLC
To: KIOBA PROCESSING, LLC
Reel/Frame 051410/0205 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2019
From: F. POSZAT HU, L.L.C.
To: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 153 LLC
Reel/Frame 050924/0857 →
MERGER Recorded Nov 20, 2015
From: PALUS A4, LLC
To: F. POSZAT HU, L.L.C.
Reel/Frame 037097/0533 →
ADDENDUM TO REVOCATION OF DONATION Recorded Aug 4, 2014
From: EVANGELISTA LAAGE, MARIA THERESA, MS
To: EVANGELISTA LAAGE, MARIA THERESA
Reel/Frame 033463/0644 →
ASSIGNMENT CHANGE DUE TO REVOCATION OF DONATION Recorded Mar 18, 2011
From: LAAGE, MARIA THERESA, MRS
To: LAAGE, MARIA THERESA, MRS; LAAGE, MARIA THERESA, MS
Reel/Frame 025983/0637 →
DOCUMENT RECORDED ON 2/24/2010 IS NOT A NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Recorded Apr 15, 2010
From: LAAGE, DOMINIQUE
To: LAAGE, DOMINIQUE
Reel/Frame 024233/0924 →
JANUARY 2010 NOTICE CONFIRMING ACCEPTANCE OF CRIMINAL COMPLAINT Recorded Feb 24, 2010
From: EVANGELISTA (LAAGE), MARIA THERESA
To: EVANGELISTA (LAAGE), MARIA THERESA
Reel/Frame 023973/0569 →
LETTER DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN CASE 09/5673 AND 09/7304 Recorded Dec 28, 2009
From: LAAGE, DOMINIQUE
To: LAAGE, DOMINIQUE
Reel/Frame 023720/0110 →
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT RE FRAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT Recorded Aug 7, 2009
From: EVANGELISTA (LAAGE), MARIA THERESA
To: EVANGELISTA (LAAGE), MARIA THERESA
Reel/Frame 023065/0111 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2007
From: CDCK CORPORATION
To: PALUS A4, LLC
Reel/Frame 020222/0944 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2004
From: CDCK FRANCE SAS
To: CDCK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015776/0329 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2002
From: CDCK CORPORATION
To: CDCK FRANCE SAS
Reel/Frame 013049/0749 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2001
From: LAAGE, DOMINIC P.; LAAGE, MARIA T.
To: CDCK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 011782/0820 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 6026381800 · Jan 24, 2001
Related Publication 20020138445A1 · Sep 26, 2002