IP Library Granted Patent US 7,188,321
Granted Patent B2
US 7,188,321 · App. 10/703,100 · Granted Mar 6, 2007

Generation of metal holes by via mutation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,188,321
App. No.
10/703,100
Granted
Mar 6, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A reduction in the intersection of vias on the last layer (“VL”) and holes in the last thin metal layer (“MLHOLE”) can be achieved without degrading product yield or robustness or increasing copper dishing. The mutation of some dense redundant VLs to MLHOLEs decreases the number of intersections between VLs and MLHOLEs.

Claims (13)

1. A method of designing a semiconductor interconnect architecture including a pair of metal layers interconnected by a plurality of conductive vias, the method comprising:

identifying the plurality of vias from a via array design;

using a spatial relationship between locations of the plurality of vias in the via array design and a location of one of the metal layers to identify in the one metal layer a predetermined position of a hole in said one metal layer relative to at least one via in the via array design;

requiring the hole in said one metal layer at said predetermined position; and

mutating the at least one via from tha plurality of vias into the hole in said one metal layer at said predetermined position.

2. The method of claim 1 , including assigning to at least one of the plurality of vias a cross-sectional area greater than a via cross-sectional area associated with the via array design.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said using step, said requiring step and said mutating step comprise renaming the at least one via as the hole.

4. The method of claim 3 , including assigning to the hole a cross-sectional area greater than a cross-sectional area of the at least one via.

5. The method of claim 4 , including assigning to at least one of the plurality of vias a cross-sectional area greater than a via cross-sectional area associated with the via array design.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said hole is in a relatively overlying relationship with a position occupied by the at least one via in the via array design.

7. The method of claim 1 , including assigning to the hole a cross-sectional area greater than a cross-sectional area of the at least one via.

8. The method of claim 1 , including assigning to the hole a cross-sectional area greater than a cross-sectional area of the at least one via.

9. The method of claim 1 , including assigning to at least one of the plurality of vias a cross-sectional area greater than a via cross-sectional area associated with the via array design.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2004
From: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
To: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
Reel/Frame 015118/0173 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2004
From: LEUNG, PAK
To: UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CO.
Reel/Frame 015015/0417 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2004
From: WONG, ROBERT C.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 015015/0419 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2004
From: DEMM, ERNST H.; HIRSCH, ALEXANDER M.
To: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP.
Reel/Frame 015015/0421 →