Method for determining the degree to which changed code has been exercised
View Patent ↗A method for determining changed code in a second program binary relative to a first or baseline program binary, where the second program is a different version of the first program, includes translating, responsive to symbol tables and/or control flow representations, machine addresses of both program binaries to symbols. The first and second program binaries are disassembled using the translated symbols. Differences between the two resulting disassemblies are determined, and a list of the differences is created. Differences between the program binaries can be determined by textually comparing the disassemblies, or alternatively, by determining the differences between the control flow representations of the programs. The list of differences can be presented to a user, or alternatively, can be passed to another process for further processing, such as test coverage analysis, code change analysis, or failure analysis, among other analyses.
1. A system comprising:
a memory;
a processor; and
computer-readable code stored on said memory and processable by said processor, said computer-readable code including:
a first program binary and a second program binary, wherein the second program is a modified version of the first program;
a disassembler; and
a comparator;
wherein the disassembler is configured to:
translate machine addresses of the first program binary and the second program binary to a respective first and second set of symbols,
convert the first and second program binaries into a first and a second disassembly, respectively, using the first and second set of symbols;
and wherein the comparator is configured to:
detect differences between the first and second disassemblies; and
provide a difference list indicative of said differences.
2. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a control flow analyzer configured to create a first control flow representation and a second control flow representation for the first and second program binary respectively, wherein the disassembler is further configured to utilize the first and second control flow representations to translate the machine addresses.
3. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a control flow analyzer configured to create a first and a second control flow graph for the first and second disassembly, respectively, wherein the comparator is further configured to detect the differences between the first and second disassemblies using graph-matching techniques.
4. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a compiler configured to create a first symbol table and a second symbol table for the first and second program binary respectively, wherein the disassembler is further configured to utilize the first and second symbol tables to translate the first and second program binaries.
5. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein each of the first and second program binaries includes debug information, wherein the disassembler is configured to utilize the debug information to translate the first and second program binaries.
6. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a filter configured to convert the difference list into a modified difference list.
7. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising an application configured to:
associate a first indicator with one or more changed lines of code in the second disassembly; and
execute the second program in a test environment, and associate a second indicator with one or more lines of code in the second disassembly executed in the test environment;
execute the second program in a non-test environment, and associate a third indicator with one or more lines of code in the second disassembly executed in the non-test environment; and
display an annotated listing of the second disassembly to a user, wherein the annotated listing includes the first indicator, the second indicator and the third indicator.
8. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a failure analysis tool, wherein the failure analysis tool is configured to highlight changed code in a code path to a failure.
9. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising a compiler configured to create At least one symbol table for the first and second program binary, wherein the disassembler is further configured to utilize the at least one symbol table to translate the first and second program binaries.
10. A method comprising:
translating machine addresses of a first program binary and a second program binary to a respective first and second set of symbols,
converting the first and second program binaries into a first and a second disassembly, respectively, using the first and second set of symbols;
detecting differences between the first and second disassemblies; and
providing a difference list indicative of said differences.
11. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising:
creating a first control flow representation and a second control flow representation for the first and second program binary, respectively; and
utilizing the first and second control flow representations to translate the machine addresses.
12. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising:
creating a first and a second control flow graph for the first and second disassembly, respectively; and
detecting the differences between the first and second disassemblies using graph-matching techniques.
13. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising:
creating a first symbol table and a second symbol table for the first and second program binary, respectively; and
utilizing the first and second symbol tables to translate the first and second program binaries.
14. The method as recited in claim 10 , wherein each of the first and second program binaries includes debug information, further comprising:
utilizing the debug information to translate the first and second program binaries.
15. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising: converting the difference list into a modified difference list using a filter.
16. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising:
associating a first indicator with one or more changed lines of code in the second disassembly; and
executing the second program in a test environment, and associating a second indicator with one or more lines of code in the second disassembly executed in the test environment;
executing the second program in a non-test environment, and associating a third indicator with one or more lines of code in the second disassembly executed in the non-test environment; and
displaying an annotated listing of the second disassembly to a user, wherein the annotated listing includes the first indicator, the second indicator and the third indicator.
17. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising:
highlighting changed code in a code path to a failure.
18. The method as recited in claim 10 , further comprising:
creating at least one symbol table for the first and second program binary; and
utilizing the at least one symbol table to translate the first and second program binaries.
19. A physical computer readable storage medium comprising program instructions, wherein the program instructions are executable to:
translate machine addresses of a first program binary and a second program binary to a respective first and second set of symbols,
convert the first and second program binaries into a first and a second disassembly, respectively, using the first and second set of symbols;
detect differences between the first and second disassemblies; and
provide a difference list indicative of said differences.
20. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
create a first control flow representation and a second control flow representation for the first and second program binary, respectively; and
utilize the first and second control flow representations to translate the machine addresses.
21. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
create a first and a second control flow graph for the first and second disassembly, respectively; and
detect the differences between the first and second disassemblies using graph-matching techniques.
22. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
create a first symbol table and a second symbol table for the first and second program binary, respectively; and
utilize the first and second symbol tables to translate the first and second program binaries.
23. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein each of the first and second program binaries includes debug information, wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
utilize the debug information to translate the first and second program binaries.
24. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
convert the difference list into a modified difference list using a filter.
25. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
associate a first indicator with one or more changed lines of code in the second disassembly; and
execute the second program in a test environment, and associate a second indicator with one or more lines of code in the second disassembly executed in the test environment;
execute the second program in a non-test environment, and associate a third indicator with one or more lines of code in the second disassembly executed in the non-test environment; and
display an annotated listing of the second disassembly to a user, wherein the annotated listing includes the first indicator, the second indicator and the third indicator.
26. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
highlight changed code in a code path to a failure.
27. The physical computer readable storage medium as recited in claim 19 , wherein the program instructions are further executable to:
create at least one symbol table for the first and second program binary; and
utilize the at least one symbol table to translate the first and second program binaries.