IP Library Granted Patent US 7,939,291
Granted Patent B2
US 7,939,291 · App. 11/832,261 · Granted May 10, 2011

Methods for the detection of microbial contaminants

Assignee: Charles River Laboratories, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,939,291
App. No.
11/832,261
Granted
May 10, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides methods and compositions for the detection and/or quantification of a microbial contaminant, for example, a bacterial endotoxin or a glucan, in a sample. In particular, the invention provides a test cartridge useful in the practice of hemocyte lysate-based assays for the detection and/or quantification of a microbial contaminant in a sample. In addition, the invention provides methods of making and using such cartridges. In addition, the invention provides a rapid, sensitive, multi-step kinetic hemocyte lysate-based assay for the detection and/or quantification of a microbial contaminant in a sample. In addition, the invention provides a glucan-specific lysate that can be used in a variety of assay formats, including, for example, a test cartridge, optionally configured to perform a kinetic assay.

Claims (25)

1. A method of determining the presence of a microbial infection or contamination in a sample, the method comprising the sequential steps of:

(a) contacting a sample with an amebocyte lysate comprising an activatable enzyme to produce a sample-lysate mixture, whereupon the enzyme becomes activated if a microbial contaminant that activates the enzyme is present in the sample;

(b) after step (a), contacting the sample-lysate mixture with a substrate for the enzyme to produce a sample-lysate-substrate mixture, such that, if the mixture contains activated enzyme, the activated enzyme produces a change in the substrate;

(c) determining the time in which a preselected change occurs in an optical property of the sample-lysate-substrate mixture, wherein the change in optical property results from a change in the substrate; and

(d) comparing the time determined in step (c) against a predetermined standard curve to determine whether the microbial infection or contamination is present in the sample.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microbial contaminant is selected from the group consisting of a lipopolysaccharide, a bacterial endotoxin, and a glucan.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the microbial contaminant is a lipopolysaccharide.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the microbial contaminant is a bacterial endotoxin.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the microbial contaminant is a glucan.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the change in optical property is an increase in absorbance of light of a preselected wavelength.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the change in optical property is a decrease in transmission of light of a preselected wavelength.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amebocyte lysate is a Limulus amebocyte lysate.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amebocyte lysate is an endotoxin-specific amebocyte lysate.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amebocyte lysate is an glucan-specific amebocyte lysate.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the activatable enzyme is pro-clotting enzyme.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the activatable enzyme is clotting enzyme.

13. The method in claim 1 , wherein the substrate is a chromogenic substrate.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the chromogenic substrate comprises a para-nitroaniline chromophore.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the chromogenic substrate comprises Ile-Glu-Ala-Arg-pNA, wherein pNA is a para-nitroaniline group.

16. The method of claim 1 , comprising the additional step of measuring the amount of the microbial contaminant in the sample.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the presence of the microbial contaminant is indicative of a microbial infection or microbial contamination.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the amount of the microbial contaminant is indicative of a microbial infection or microbial contamination.

19. The method of claim 17 or 18 , wherein the microbial infection is a bacterial, yeast, mold, or fungal infection.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein steps (a) and (b) provide a predetermined assay sensitivity and duration.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein steps (a) and (b) are performed in a well defined by a solid support.

Assignments (7)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2024
From: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 069647/0925 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 18, 2010
From: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 025388/0073 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2008
From: RUMORE, FRANK C.; BALAS, CHARLES, JR.
To: CAMBRIDGE INSTRUMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 021123/0119 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2008
From: WAINWRIGHT, NORMAN R.
To: MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY
Reel/Frame 021123/0128 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2008
From: MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY
To: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 021123/0138 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2008
From: CAMBRIDGE INSTRUMENTS, LLC
To: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 021123/0122 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2008
From: JORDAN, FOSTER T.
To: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 021123/0116 →
Continuity (4)
Division 11784778 · Apr 9, 2007
Division 10803177 · Mar 17, 2004
Provisional Application 60455632 · Mar 17, 2003
Related Publication 20080020422A1 · Jan 24, 2008