IP Library Granted Patent US 8,307,539
Granted Patent B1
US 8,307,539 · App. 12/571,261 · Granted Nov 13, 2012

Method for modeling devices in a wafer

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,307,539
App. No.
12/571,261
Granted
Nov 13, 2012
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method for modeling devices in a wafer comprises the step of providing the wafer comprising a first plurality of devices having a track width and a first stripe height, a second plurality of devices having the track width and a second stripe height, and a third plurality of devices having the track width and a third stripe height. The method further comprises the steps of measuring resistance values for the first, second and third plurality of devices to obtain a data set correlating a stripe height and a resistance value for each of the first, second and third plurality of devices, and estimating a linear relationship between resistance and inverse stripe height for the first, second and third plurality of devices based on the data set.

Claims (148)

1. A method for modeling devices in a wafer, comprising the steps of:

providing the wafer comprising a first plurality of devices having a track width TW and a first stripe height SH 1 , a second plurality of devices having the track width TW and a second stripe height SH 2 , and a third plurality of devices having the track width TW and a third stripe height SH 3 ;

measuring resistance values for the first, second and third plurality of devices to obtain a data set correlating a stripe height and a resistance value for each of the first, second and third plurality of devices; and

estimating a linear relationship between resistance and inverse stripe height for the first, second and third plurality of devices based on the data set,

wherein SH 1 differs from SH 2 by a first predetermined amount δH 1 , and wherein SH 2 differs from SH 3 by a second predetermined amount δH 2 , such that SH 1 +δH 1 =SH 2 and SH 2 +δH 2 =SH 3 .

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first, second and third plurality of devices comprise magnetoresistive transducers.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first, second and third plurality of devices comprise electronic lapping guides.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein SH 1 ≠SH 2 ≠SH 3 .

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first predetermined amount δH 1 is equal to the second predetermined amount δH 2 , such that δH=δH 1 =δH 2 .

6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising the step of estimating SH 1 , SH 2 and SH 3 according to the formula SH 1 +δH=SH 3 −δH=SH 2 =2δH((R 3 −R 1 )/(R 3 +R 1 −2R 2 )), wherein R 1 is a measured resistance value for one of the first plurality of devices, R 2 is a measured resistance value for one of the second plurality of devices, and R 3 is a measured resistance value for one of the third plurality of devices.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the wafer comprises m pluralities of devices, each plurality of devices having a different stripe height than other ones of the plurality of devices.

8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein m is greater than 3.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the linear relationship between resistance R and inverse stripe height 1/SH is estimated according to the formula R=Intercept+Slope/SH, where

Slope

=

(

i

=

1

n

x

i

y

i

)

-

n

xy

_

i

=

1

n

x

i

2

-

n

x

_

2

and

Intercept

=

y

_

(

i

=

1

n

x

i

2

)

-

x

_

i

=

1

n

x

i

y

i

i

=

1

n

x

i

2

-

n

x

_

2

,

and where n is a number of points in the data set, x is an inverse of a stripe height in the data set, and y is a resistance value in the data set.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the Intercept represents a resistance value of leads connected to each of the first, second and third plurality of devices.

11. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the Slope represents a device resistance area (RA) divided by the track width TW.

12. The method according to claim 11 , wherein the first, second and third plurality of devices comprise magnetoresistive transducers.

13. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the first, second and third plurality of devices comprise electronic lapping guides, and wherein the Slope represents a sheet resistance times the track width TW.

14. The method according to claim 9 , further comprising the step of estimating a correlation coefficient r for the data set according to the formula

r

=

(

x

-

x

_

)

(

y

-

y

_

)

(

x

-

x

_

)

2

(

y

-

y

_

)

2

.

15. The method according to claim 14 , wherein if r 2 is below a predetermined threshold, one or more correlated stripe height and resistance values are removed from the data set before estimating the linear relationship.

16. The method according to claim 15 , further comprising averaging stripe height and resistance values from one or more devices adjacent to the devices corresponding to the removed values to replace the values removed from the data set.

17. The method according to claim 14 , wherein if r 2 is below a predetermined threshold, residuals within the data set are calculated, the correlated stripe height and resistance value corresponding to the largest calculated residual is rejected, and the Intercept, Slope and r 2 are recalculated with the remaining data.

18. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first, second and third plurality of devices are arranged in corresponding first, second and third rows.

19. The method according to claim 18 , further comprising the steps of:

cutting the wafer to separate the first, second and third rows to form a first, a second and a third bar of devices; and

lapping each of the first, second and third bar of devices until a remaining stripe height for each of the corresponding plurality of devices therein is reached, based upon a measured change in resistance value and the estimated linear relationship.

20. The method according to claim 19 , wherein the step of cutting the wafer occurs after the step of estimating the linear relationship.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 038710 FRAME 0845 Recorded Feb 8, 2022
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC; WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 058965/0445 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2019
From: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC
To: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 050450/0582 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2018
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC
Reel/Frame 045501/0158 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 16, 2016
From: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038744/0755 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 16, 2016
From: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038710/0845 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 16, 2016
From: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 038744/0675 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR NAME FROM MARC D. MORAVEC TO MARK D. MORAVEC ON THE ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 023658 FRAME 0117. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NAME OF ASSIGNOR MARK D. MORAVEC WAS MISSPELLED DUE TO AN ERROR ON THE ORGINAL RECORDATION FORM COVER SHEET. Recorded Jan 28, 2010
From: RUDY, STEVEN C.; MCKIE, ERIC R.; MORAVEC, MARK D.
To: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC
Reel/Frame 023866/0959 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2009
From: RUDY, STEVEN C.; MCKIE, ERIC R.; MORAVEC, MARC D.
To: WESTERN DIGITAL (FREMONT), LLC
Reel/Frame 023658/0117 →