IP Library Granted Patent US 8,666,909
Granted Patent B2
US 8,666,909 · App. 13/155,917 · Granted Mar 4, 2014

Interestingness recommendations in a computing advice facility

Inventors: Thomas Pinckney (New York, NY); Christopher Dixon (New York, NY); Matthew Ryan Gattis (New York, NY)
Assignee: eBay, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,666,909
App. No.
13/155,917
Granted
Mar 4, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides a recommendation to a user through a computer-based advice facility, comprising collecting topical information, wherein the collected topical information includes an interestingness aspect; filtering the collected topical information based on the interestingness aspect; determining an interestingness rating from the collected topical information, wherein the determining is through the computer-based advice facility; and providing a user with the recommendation related to the topical information based on the interestingness rating.

Claims (57)

1. A method of providing a recommendation to a user through a computer-based advice facility, comprising:

collecting topical information, wherein the collected topical information includes an interestingness aspect, the interestingness aspect being based on the similarity to a user's taste profile and based on newness of the topical information, wherein the interestingness aspect of the topical information is an indication that the topical in has some aspect of newness;

filtering the collected topical information based on the interestingness aspect;

determining an interestingness rating from the collected topical information, wherein the determining is through the computer-based advice facility; and

providing a user with the recommendation related to the topical information based on the interestingness rating.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interestingness aspect is derived from social activity of another individual that indicates a recommendation for a topic.

3. The method of claim 2 , the other individual is a friend.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the other individual is a famous person.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the other individual is an authoritative person.

6. The method of claim 2 , wherein the other individual has similar tastes to the user.

7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the social activity is saving a recommendation.

8. The method of claim wherein the social activity is at least one of commenting and discussing a recommendation actively.

9. The method of claim 2 , wherein the social activity is collected from sources on the Internet.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the newness is an indication that the topical information is new topical information over a predetermined period of time.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the newness is an indication that the topical information is newly popular.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein newly popular is determined from an activity level on the web.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interestingness aspect of the topical information is from at least one of a review, recommendation, blog entry, tweet, authoritative source, news source, and e-publication.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interestingness aspect is time data.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the time data is a release date.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the release date is a release date of a movie.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the release date is a release date of a product.

18. The method of claim 14 wherein the time data is an event opening.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the opening is a restaurant opening.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the opening is a cultural event opening.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interestingness aspect is how frequently the topical information is referenced in online sources.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the interestingness aspect is related to a user interaction with a computer device.

23. The method of claim 22 , wherein the user interactions are interpreted by the machine learning facility as user behavior that indicates a preference level for the topical information by the user.

24. The method of claim 22 , wherein the user interaction is selection of a web link.

25. The method of claim 22 , wherein the user interaction is at least one of tapping, touching, and clicking on the computer device screen.

26. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer-based advice facility includes a machine-learning facility.

27. The method of claim 1 wherein the computer-based advice facility includes a recommendation facility.

28. The method of claim 1 , wherein the filtering is collaborative filing.

29. The method of claim 1 , wherein recommendations are sent to a user's mobile communications facility to provide recommendations in the user's current geographic area.

30. The method of claim 29 , wherein there is a graphical user interface on the mobile communications facility that provides the user with the ability to refine provided recommendations to the user.

31. The method of claim 29 , wherein the recommendations show the user at least one of items to buy, events to go to, and things to see.

32. The method of claim 29 , wherein the recommendation is related to a local store.

33. The method of claim 29 , wherein the recommendation is related to a local restaurant.

34. The method of claim 29 , wherein the recommendation is related to a local bar.

35. The method of claim 29 , wherein the recommendation is related to entertainment.

36. The method of claim 29 , wherein recommendations are further filtered to the user based on interestingness specific to the geographic area.

37. The method of claim 29 , wherein a recommendations feed is sent to the user for the current geographic area the user is located In.

38. The method of claim 29 , wherein recommendations are only sent to the user that meet a threshold in confidence and in how much the system predicts the user will like the recommendation.

39. The method of claim 38 , wherein the threshold in confidence is related to the interestingness rating.

40. The method of claim 38 , wherein the threshold in confidence is determined by a machine learning facility based on past behavior of the user as related to previous recommendations provided by the system.

41. The method of claim 29 , wherein the user is able to save recommendations to at, least one of storage on the mobile communications facility and storage with the computer-based advice facility.

42. A non-transitory machine-readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a machine, cause the machine to perform operations comprising:

collecting topical information, wherein the collected topical information includes an interestingness aspect, the interestingness aspect being based on the similarity to a user's taste profile and based on newness of the topical information, wherein the interestingness aspect of the topical information is an indication that the topical information has some aspect of newness;

filtering the collected topical information based on the interestingness aspect;

determining an interestingness rating from the collected topical information, wherein the determining is through the computer -based advice facility; and

providing a user with the recommendation related to the topical information based on the interestingness rating.

43. A system comprising:

a machine including a memory and at least one processor; and

a computer-based advice facility, executable by the machine, configured to:

collect topical information, wherein the collected topical information includes an interestingness aspect, the interestingness aspect being based on the similarity to a user's taste profile and based on newness of the topical information, wherein the interestingness aspect of the topical information is an indication that the topical information has some aspect of newness;

filter the collected topical information based on the interestingness aspect;

determine an interestingness rating from the collected topical information, wherein the determining is through the computer-based advice facility; and

provide a user with the recommendation related to the topical information based on the interestingness rating.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT-APPLICAT'S REPRESENTATIVE SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR RECORDATION OF MERGER DOCUMENT BETWEEN HUNCH, INC. AND EBAY INC. ON DECEMBER 2011, WHICH WAS RECORDED ON JANUARY 05, 2012 AT REEL 027475, FRAME 0958-0962. APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE INADVERTENTLLY INCLUDED AN ADDITIONAL PAGE (REFERENCED HEREIN AS "INTEL-NUMONYX") WITH THE ORIGINAL MERGER DOCUMENT THAT WAS RECORDED. APPLICANT RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THAT THE ORIGINAL MERGER DOCUMENT ATTACHED HERETO IS RECORDED WITHOUT THE INTEL-NUMONYX PAGE. Recorded Mar 16, 2012
From: HUNCH INC.
To: EBAY INC.
Reel/Frame 027890/0823 →
MERGER Recorded Dec 28, 2011
From: HUNCH INC.
To: EBAY INC.
Reel/Frame 027475/0958 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2011
From: PINCKNEY, THOMAS; DIXON, CHRISTOPHER; GATTIS, MATTHEW RYAN
To: HUNCH INC.
Reel/Frame 026521/0675 →
Continuity (14)
Continuation In Part 12813715 · Jun 11, 2010
Continuation In Part 12813738 · Jun 11, 2010
Continuation In Part 12483768 · Jun 12, 2009
Continuation In Part 12483768
Continuation In Part 12262862 · Oct 31, 2008
Provisional Application 61477276 · Apr 20, 2011
Provisional Application 61430318 · Jan 6, 2011
Provisional Application 61438684 · Feb 2, 2011
Provisional Application 61233326 · Aug 12, 2009
Provisional Application 61300511 · Feb 2, 2010
Provisional Application 61097394 · Sep 16, 2008
Provisional Application 60984948 · Nov 2, 2007
Provisional Application 61060226 · Jun 10, 2008
Related Publication 20110302117A1 · Dec 8, 2011