Mitigating single point failure of devices in an analyte monitoring system and methods thereof
Methods, devices, and kits are provided for mitigating single point failure of at least one device in an analyte monitoring system.
1. A computer-implemented method for mitigating single point failure of at least one device in an analyte monitoring system, comprising:
requesting, using a second device, that a functionality check of one or more components of a first device be performed and that data related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device be communicated to the second device;
receiving, at the second device, information from the first device that is related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device;
communicating, using the second device, the information related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device to a third device;
receiving, at the second device, a request from the third device that an alarm be annunciated if it is determined by the third device that the one or more components of the first device is not functioning in accordance with at least one predetermined criterion; and
annunciating, using the second device, the alarm to alert that the one or more components of the first device is not functioning in accordance with the at least one predetermined criterion.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first device is a continuous glucose monitor.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the second device includes a repeater unit operatively coupled to the continuous glucose monitor.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the third device includes one of a receiver device or an insulin pump.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more components of the first device include at least one of a microprocessor, a power supply, a sensor, and an electronic component.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the alarm includes at least one of an audio alarm, a vibratory alarm, and a visual alarm.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving, at the second device, a request from the third device that the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device be performed and that the data related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device be communicated to the third device, wherein the second device is operatively coupled to the first device.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the information related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device includes a lack of the data being received from the first device.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the functionality check includes at least one of a determination of a current, a voltage, or a resistance that is measured across an electrical circuit in the one or more components, applying an input to the one or more components and receiving an output from the one or more components, a digital check of the one or more components, a checksum of a memory of the first device, a self-test output check of the one or more components, and an electrical or mechanical test of at least one switch of the one or more components.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one predetermined criterion includes at least one of a current, a voltage, and a resistance threshold used to define a proper operating range of the first device, a power supply measurement that defines an acceptable tolerance, and a digital threshold range used to define the proper operating range.
11. A computer-implemented method for mitigating single point failure of at least one device in an analyte monitoring system, comprising:
requesting, using a second device, that a functionality check of one or more components of a first device be performed and that data related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device be communicated to the second device;
receiving, at the second device, the data related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device;
retrieving, from the second device, a list including at least one predetermined criterion related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device;
comparing, using the second device, the data related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device with the list including the at least one predetermined criterion; and
determining, using the second device, if the one or more components of the first device is functioning in accordance with the at least one predetermined criterion.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , further comprising:
requesting, using the second device, that an alarm be annunciated at a third device to alert a user if it is determined by the second device that the one or more components of the first device is not functioning in accordance with the at least one predetermined criterion.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , wherein the third device is operatively coupled to the first device.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , wherein the request for the functionality check is received by the third device and the third device polls the first device to perform the functionality check.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , further comprising:
annunciating, using the second device, an alarm to alert a user if it is determined that the one or more components of the first device is not functioning in accordance with the at least one predetermined criterion.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the third device is a repeater unit operatively coupled to the first device.
17. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more components of the first device include at least one of a microprocessor, a power supply, a sensor, and an electric component.
18. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the alarm includes at least one of an audio alarm, a vibratory alarm, and a visual alarm.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the functionality check includes at least one of a determination of a current, a voltage, and a resistance that is measured across an electrical circuit in the one or more components, applying an input to the one or more components and receiving an output from the one or more components, a digital check of the one or more components, a checksum of a memory of the first device, a self-test output check of the one or more components, and an electrical or mechanical test of at least one switch of the one or more components.
20. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the at least one predetermined criterion includes at least one of a current, a voltage, and a resistance threshold used to define a proper operating range of the first device, a power supply measurement that defines an acceptable tolerance, and a digital threshold range used to define the proper operating range.
21. A computer-implemented method for mitigating single point failure of at least one device in an analyte monitoring system, comprising:
requesting, using a second device, that a functionality check of one or more components of a first device be performed and that data related to the functionality check of the one or more components of the first device be communicated to the second device; and
determining, using the second device, that the one or more components of the first device is not functioning properly if the data related to the functionality check of the components of the first device is not received at the second device;
wherein an alarm is annunciated from at least one of the second device or a third device to alert that the one or more components of the first device is not functioning properly.