IP Library Granted Patent US 8,958,790
Granted Patent B2
US 8,958,790 · App. 13/643,988 · Granted Feb 17, 2015

Management of macro network KPI impacts for a mass deployment of femtocells

Inventor: Alan James Auchmuty Carter (Swindon, GB)
Assignee: Uniquisys Limited
H04W52/244H04W52/24H04W52/228H04W52/283H04W52/287H04W52/343
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,958,790
App. No.
13/643,988
Granted
Feb 17, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

Power management is provided in a femtocell basestation in a cellular communications network, in order to ensure that the effect of a mass deployment of femtocells on the key performance indicators of the surrounding macro network is bounded, for all femtocell traffic profiles. An expected area density of femtocells is determined; a macro layer quality criterion is set; a network performance indicator impact level is set; a maximum impact area allowed for the femtocell is calculated, based on the expected area density of femtocells, the macro layer quality criterion, and the network performance indicator impact level; a distance of a macro layer user from the femtocell is estimated; and the downlink power in the femtocell is controlled, based on the estimated distance of the macro layer user from the femtocell and based on the calculated maximum impact area.

Claims (71)

1. A method of controlling a downlink power in a femtocell, the method comprising:

determining an expected area density of femtocells;

setting a macro layer quality criterion;

setting a network performance indicator impact level;

calculating a maximum impact area allowed for the femtocell, based on the expected area density of femtocells, the macro layer quality criterion, and the network performance indicator impact level;

estimating a distance of a macro layer user from the femtocell; and

controlling the downlink power in the femtocell based on the estimated distance of the macro layer user from the femtocell and based on the calculated maximum impact area.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the step of controlling the downlink power in the femtocell based on the estimated distance of the macro layer user from the femtocell and based on the calculated maximum impact area is performed when the femtocell has only idle traffic.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the step of controlling the downlink power in the femtocell based on the estimated distance of the macro layer user from the femtocell and based on the calculated maximum impact area is performed when the femtocell is carrying no traffic, and when the femtocell detects a nearby macro layer user.

4. A method of controlling a downlink power in a femtocell, the method comprising:

estimating a distance of a macro layer user from the femtocell;

determining whether the estimated distance is within an interference radius, the interference radius being determined on the basis of an expected area density of femtocells and a network performance indicator impact level; and

when the estimated distance is within the interference radius, controlling the downlink power in the femtocell to a first predetermined power level.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4 , comprising setting the first predetermined power level by:

determining an estimated path loss from the femtocell to the interference radius;

measuring a signal strength of transmissions from a macro layer basestation; and

setting the first predetermined power level on the basis of the estimated path loss from the femtocell to the interference radius and the measured signal strength of the transmissions from the macro layer basestation.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 , comprising setting the first predetermined power level by:

determining a femto CPICH (Common Pilot Channel) reset transmit power substantially according to the equation:

Femto CPICH Reset Power=Local Macro Layer RSCP+PL5−- Femto Power Delta

where Local Macro Layer RSCP (Received Signal Code Power) is the measured signal strength of the transmissions from the macro layer basestation;

PL 5 (Pathloss 5 ) is the estimated path loss from the femtocell to the interference radius to the interference boundary;

Femto Power Delta is approximately the macro layer CPICH Ec/Io at the interference boundary; and

determining the first predetermined power level on the basis of a known ratio of the femtocell CPICH power to the total femtocell power.

7. A method as claimed in claim 4 , comprising:

first determining first determining that the femtocell is carrying no traffic, and detecting an active macro layer user nearby.

8. A method as claimed in claim 4 , comprising:

first determining that the femtocell is carrying only idle traffic, and detecting multiple registration requests from a macro layer user.

9. A femtocell basestation, adapted to

estimate a distance of a macro layer user from the femtocell;

determine whether the estimated distance is within an interference radius, the interference radius being determined on the basis of an expected area density of femtocells and a network performance indicator impact level; and

when the estimated distance is within the interference radius, control the downlink power in the femtocell to a first predetermined power level.

10. A femtocell basestation as claimed in claim 9 , further adapted to:

determine an estimated path loss from the femtocell to the interference radius;

measure a signal strength of transmissions from a macro layer basestation; and

set the first predetermined power level on the basis of the estimated path loss from the femtocell to the interference radius and the measured signal strength of the transmissions from the macro layer basestation.

11. A femtocell basestation as claimed in claim 10 , further adapted to set the first predetermined power level by:

determining a femto CPICH (Common Pilot Channel) reset transmit power substantially according to the equation:

Femto CPICH Reset Power=Local Macro Layer RSCP+PL5−Femto Power Delta

where Local Macro Layer RSCP (Received Signal Code Power) is the measured signal strength of the transmissions from the macro layer basestation;

PL 5 (Pathloss 5 ) is the estimated path loss from the femtocell to the interference radius to the interference boundary; and

Femto Power Delta is approximately the macro layer CPICH Echo at the interference boundary; and

determine the first predetermined power level on the basis of a known ratio of the femtocell CPICH power to the total femtocell power.

12. A femtocell basestation as claimed in claim 9 , further adapted to:

first determine that the femtocell is carrying no traffic, and detect an active macro layer user nearby.

13. A femtocell basestation as claimed in claim 9 , further adapted to:

first determine that the femtocell is carrying only idle traffic, and detect multiple registration requests from a macro layer user.

14. A method of controlling a downlink power in a femtocell, the method comprising:

when the femtocell stops carrying any traffic, reducing the downlink power of the femtocell to a resting power level after a time threshold has expired,

the method further comprising the step of:

setting the time threshold based on an activity level of the femtocell.

15. A method as claimed in claim 14 , wherein setting the time threshold comprises:

determining whether the activity level of the femtocell exceeds an activity threshold;

if the activity level of the femtocell exceeds the activity threshold, setting the time threshold to a first time threshold; and

if the activity level of the femtocell does not exceed the activity threshold, setting the time threshold to a second time threshold shorter than the first time threshold.

16. A femtocell basestation, adapted to:

when the femtocell stops carrying any traffic, reduce the downlink power of the femtocell to a resting power level after a time threshold has expired; and

set the time threshold based on an activity level of the femtocell.

17. A femtocell basestation as claimed in claim 16 , further adapted to set the time threshold by:

determining whether the activity level of the femtocell exceeds an activity threshold;

if the activity level of the femtocell exceeds the activity threshold, set the time threshold to a first time threshold; and

if the activity level of the femtocell does not exceed the activity threshold, set the time threshold to a second time threshold shorter than the first time threshold.

18. A femtocell basestation adapted to:

determine an expected area density of femtocells;

set a macro layer quality criterion;

set a network performance indicator impact level;

calculate a maximum impact area allowed for the femtocell, based on the expected area density of femtocells, the macro layer quality criterion, and the network performance indicator impact level;

estimate a distance of a macro layer user from the femtocell; and

control the downlink power in the femtocell based on the estimated distance of the macro layer user from the femtocell and based on the calculated maximum impact area.

19. A femtocell basestation as claimed in claim 18 , further adapted to only control the downlink power in the femtocell based on the estimated distance of the macro layer user from the femtocell and based on the calculated maximum impact area when the femtocell has only idle traffic.

20. A femtocell basestation as claimed in claim 19 , further adapted to only control the downlink power in the femtocell based on the estimated distance of the macro layer user from the femtocell and based on the calculated maximum impact area when the femtocell is carrying no traffic, and when the femtocell detects a nearby macro layer user.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2019
From: UBIQUISYS LIMTED
To: CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 048329/0578 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2013
From: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC
To: UBIQUISYS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 030518/0158 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2013
From: CARTER, ALAN JAMES AUCHMUTY
To: UBIQUISYS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 029922/0068 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 28, 2013
From: NOBLE VENTURE FINANCE II S.A.
To: UBIQUISYS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 029898/0852 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 1007268.4 · Apr 30, 2010 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20130171985A1 · Jul 4, 2013