IP Library Granted Patent US 9,031,881
Granted Patent B2
US 9,031,881 · App. 11/771,114 · Granted May 12, 2015

Method and apparatus for validating an appraisal report and providing an appraisal score

Inventor: Benjamin C. Graboske (Santa Ana, CA)
Assignee: Corelogic Solutions, LLC
G06Q50/16G06Q30/0278
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,031,881
App. No.
11/771,114
Granted
May 12, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-based method for validating an appraisal report includes receiving appraisal data for a property, receiving property data for the property, verifying the appraisal data meets an appraisal guideline, providing a list of appraisal items that are present in the appraisal data, providing a medium discrepancy amount and a high discrepancy amount for the list of appraisal items, calculating a difference amount between the appraisal data and the property data for each appraisal item, and comparing the difference amount to the medium discrepancy amount and the high discrepancy amount.

Claims (35)

1. A non-transitory machine-readable medium for validating appraisal input data entered into an appraisal report that includes a valuation appraisal comprising computer-readable instructions that when executed by a processor cause the processor to:

receive the appraisal input data for a property, said appraisal input data being provided through an interface by an appraiser and said appraisal input data comprising a selection of one or more comparables associated with said property;

receive through the interface property data for the property from a public records database;

identify a list of appraisal items that are present in the appraisal input data and that form a basis on which the valuation appraisal is performed;

setting a user-established discrepancy threshold;

calculate with the processor a difference amount between the appraisal input data and the property data for each appraisal item to validate the appraisal input data with the data for the property from the public records database;

determine whether the difference amount exceeds the user-established discrepancy threshold;

determine a distance between each of the one or more selected comparables and the property;

determine whether the distance between each of the one or more comparables and the property falls within a proper guideline for the one or more comparables to be considered a comparable property;

identify one or more other comparables from the public record database that are more comparable to the subject property than the one or more comparables based at least in part on a sale price, a sale date, a gross living area, a year built, a lot size, a number of bedrooms, or a number of bathrooms associated with the one or more other comparables; and

generate a discrepancy message that reports a discrepancy when the difference amount exceeds the user-established discrepancy threshold so as to alert of a potential fraudulent appraisal, and that includes the one or more other comparables.

2. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 wherein the appraisal input data is selected from a group consisting of an address, a sale price, a sale date, a location, a type of leasehold, a lot size, a home size, a view, a design and appeal, a quality of construction, an age or year built, a condition, a bedroom count, a bathroom count, a roof type, a functional utility, a heating/cooling type, energy efficient items, a number of garages, an amenities list of the property, and combinations thereof.

3. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 wherein the property data is selected from a group consisting of an address, a sale price, a sale date, a location, a type of leasehold, a lot size, a home size, a view, a design and appeal, a quality of construction, an age or year built, a condition, a bedroom count, a bathroom count, a roof type, a functional utility, a heating/cooling type, energy efficient items, a number of garages, an amenities list of the property, and combinations thereof.

4. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause a machine to set a high severity indicator if the difference amount is greater than the high discrepancy amount.

5. The machine-readable medium of claim 4 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to set a medium severity indicator if the difference amount is greater than the medium discrepancy amount.

6. The machine-readable medium of claim 5 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to provide a list of validation rules.

7. The machine-readable medium of claim 6 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to receive a set fail flag for at least one of the validation rules.

8. The machine-readable medium of claim 7 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to use the appraisal input data to determine whether the validation rule with the set fail flag is satisfied.

9. The machine-readable medium of claim 8 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to use the high severity indicator to determine whether the validation rule with the set fail flag is satisfied.

10. The machine-readable medium of claim 8 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to use the medium severity indicator to determine whether the validation rule with the set fail flag is satisfied.

11. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to provide the one or more comparables and the property on a graphical map.

12. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to provide the one or more comparables, the one or more other comparables, and the discrepancy message as a graphical output.

13. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 further comprising instructions that upon execution cause the machine to calculate an appraisal score for the appraiser based at least in part on the calculated difference amount between the appraisal input data and the property data for each appraisal item.

14. The machine-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein a lower appraisal score is representative of a higher calculated difference amount between the appraisal input data and the property data for each appraisal item.

15. A non-transitory machine-readable medium for validating appraisal input data entered into an appraisal report that includes a valuation appraisal comprising computer-readable instructions that when executed by a processor cause the processor to:

receive the appraisal input data for a property, said appraisal input data being provided through an interface by an appraiser and said appraisal input data comprising a selection of one or more comparables associated with said property;

receive through the interface property data for the property from a public records database;

identify a list of appraisal items that are present in the appraisal input data and that form a basis on which the valuation appraisal is performed;

setting a user-established discrepancy threshold;

calculate with the processor a difference amount between the appraisal input data and the property data for each appraisal item to validate the appraisal input data with the data for the property from the public records database;

determine whether the difference amount exceeds the user-established discrepancy threshold;

determine a distance between each of the one or more comparables and the property;

determine whether the distance between each of the one or more comparables and the property falls within a proper guideline for the one or more comparables to be considered a comparable property;

identify one or more other comparables from the public record database that are more comparable to the subject property than the one or more comparables; and

generate a notification that the valuation appraisal has failed when the difference amount exceeds the user-established discrepancy threshold so as to alert of a potential fraudulent appraisal.

Assignments (14)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2021
From: CDS BUSINESS MAPPING, LLC; CLAREITY SECURITY, LLC; CORELOGIC CREDCO, LLC; CORELOGIC DORADO, LLC; CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC; CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC; CORELOGIC, INC.; FNC, INC.; LOCATION INC. GROUP CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 056539/0146 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 10, 2021
From: CDS BUSINESS MAPPING, LLC; CLAREITY SECURITY, LLC; CORELOGIC CREDCO, LLC; CORELOGIC DORADO, LLC; CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC; CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC; CORELOGIC, INC.; FNC, INC.; LOCATION INC. GROUP CORPORATION
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 056539/0227 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 10, 2021
From: CDS BUSINESS MAPPING, LLC; CLAREITY SECURITY, LLC; CORELOGIC CREDCO, LLC; CORELOGIC DORADO, LLC; CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC; CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC; CORELOGIC, INC.; FNC, INC.; LOCATION INC. GROUP CORPORATION
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 056539/0241 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT 032798/0047 Recorded Jun 5, 2021
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 056493/0957 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE FROM 04/04/2014 TO 04/09/2014 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 033034 FRAME 0292. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011. Recorded Jun 18, 2014
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT
To: CORELOGIC INFORMATION RESOURCES, LLC (F/K/A CORELOGIC US, INC. AND F/K/A FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION); CORELOGIC DORADO, LLC (F/K/A CORELOGIC DORADO CORPORATION AND F/K/A DORADO NETWORK SYSTEMS CORPORATION); CORELOGIC, INC. (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION); CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC (F/K/A MARKETLINX, INC. AND F/K/A CORELOGIC REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, LLC (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS LLC AND F/K/A CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.)); CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC; CORELOGIC VALUATION SERVICES, LLC (F/K/A EAPPRAISEIT LLC); CORELOGIC REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.)
Reel/Frame 033198/0553 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED PRIOR TO JUNE 25, 2011 Recorded May 28, 2014
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AND COLLATERAL AGENT
To: CORELOGIC INFORMATION RESOURCES, LLC (F/K/A CORELOGIC US, INC. AND F/K/A FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION); CORELOGIC DORADO, LLC (F/K/A CORELOGIC DORADO CORPORATION AND F/K/A DORADO NETWORK SYSTEMS CORPORATION); CORELOGIC, INC. (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION); CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC (F/K/A MARKETLINX, INC. AND F/K/A CORELOGIC REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, LLC (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS LLC AND F/K/A CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.)); CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC; CORELOGIC VALUATION SERVICES, LLC (F/K/A EAPPRAISEIT LLC); CORELOGIC REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC (F/K/A FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.)
Reel/Frame 033034/0292 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2014
From: CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 032798/0047 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 19, 2012
From: CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 027558/0010 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 24, 2011
From: CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 026499/0118 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 26, 2010
From: FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.
To: CORELOGIC INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 024879/0916 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 14, 2010
From: FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 024529/0157 →
CORRECTIVE SECURITY AGREEMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR AND ASSIGNEE. REEL 020339 FRAME 0783 Recorded May 14, 2010
From: FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC HOLDINGS, INC.
To: HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 024390/0090 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 27, 2007
From: HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC HOLDINGS,INC.
Reel/Frame 020339/0783 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2007
From: GRABOSKE, BENJAMIN C.
To: FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 019498/0786 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 60817881 · Jun 30, 2006
Related Publication 20080004893A1 · Jan 3, 2008