IP Library Granted Patent US 9,304,973
Granted Patent B2
US 9,304,973 · App. 13/994,969 · Granted Apr 5, 2016

Method for assessing breast density

Inventors: John J. Heine (New Port Richey, FL); Thomas A. Sellers (Tampa, FL)
Assignee: H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc.
G06F17/18A61B5/4312A61B6/502A61B6/5217A61B6/583G06F19/345G06F19/3431G06K9/00496G06K9/623G06T7/0012G06T2207/10116G06T2207/20076G06T2207/30068
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,304,973
App. No.
13/994,969
Granted
Apr 5, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

Breast density is a significant breast cancer risk factor measured from mammograms. Evidence suggests that the spatial variation in mammograms may also be associated with risk. The variation in calibrated mammograms as a breast cancer risk factor was investigated and its relationship with other measures of breast density was explored using full field digital mammography (FFDM) as described herein. A matched case-control analysis was used to assess a spatial variation breast density measure in calibrated FFDM images, normalized for the image acquisition technique variation. The findings indicate the variation measure is a viable automated method for assessing breast density. Insights gained by this work may be used to develop a standard for measuring breast density.

Claims (56)

1. A method of assessing breast density for breast cancer risk applications, comprising:

receiving digital image data including a plurality of pixels;

calibrating the digital image data;

measuring a variation of pixel values of the calibrated digital image data, wherein measuring a variation of pixel values of the calibrated digital image data further comprises at least one of calculating an l 2 norm or order derived therefrom or calculating an l 1 norm or order derived therefrom; and

associating the variation of pixel values with a measure of risk for breast cancer, wherein the variation of pixel values correlates with at least one of a relative risk for breast cancer, an odds ratio for breast cancer, or an absolute risk prediction for breast cancer.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring a variation of pixel values of the calibrated digital image data further comprises:

calculating an l 2 norm or order derived therefrom;

calculating an l 1 norm or order derived therefrom; and

calculating a combination of measures based on results of the l 2 norm or order derived therefrom and the l 2 norm or order derived therefrom.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein calculating a combination of measures further comprises at least one of using a linear method, using a non-linear method, or using a Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process, Principal Component Analysis, partial least squares or kernel-based method.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein calibrating the digital image data further comprises adjusting for image acquisition technique parameters by adjusting for at least one of variation in target/filter combination, x-ray tube voltage, radiation exposure, or compressed breast thickness.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein calibrating the digital image data is performed pixel-by-pixel.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein calibrating the digital image data further comprises:

calculating an average pixel value of an n×n pixel region; and

calibrating the average pixel value.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the digital image data comprises an image having a breast tissue area and a background area, the method further comprising:

segmenting the breast tissue area from the background area of the image.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

assigning pixel values within the breast tissue area a first value; and

assigning pixel values within the background area a second value.

9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising positioning a radial coordinate system origin at a side of the image at a first direction centroid position estimated from the segmented image.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising eroding a percentage of the image between the radial coordinate system origin and a perimeter of the breast area along a radial direction.

11. A method of assessing breast density for breast cancer risk applications, comprising:

receiving digital image data including a plurality of pixels;

calibrating the digital image data;

measuring a variation of pixel values of the calibrated digital image data, wherein measuring a variation of pixel values of the calibrated digital image data further comprises calculating the variation using an n th central or non-central moment of an integer or a fractional order or any real number order; and

associating the variation of pixel values with a measure of risk for breast cancer, wherein the variation of pixel values correlates with at least one of a relative risk for breast cancer, an odds ratio for breast cancer, or an absolute risk prediction for breast cancer.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein measuring a variation of pixel values of the calibrated digital image data further comprises:

calculating a first n th central or non-central moment;

calculating a second n th central or non-central moment, the second n th central or non-central moment being different than the first n th central or non-central moment; and

calculating a combination of measures based on results of the first and second n th central or non-central moments using at least one of a linear method or a non-linear method.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein calibrating the digital image data further comprises adjusting for image acquisition technique parameters by adjusting for at least one of variation in target/filter combination, x-ray tube voltage, radiation exposure, or compressed breast thickness.

14. A method of assessing breast density for breast cancer risk applications, comprising:

receiving digital image data including a plurality of pixels;

measuring a variation of pixel values of the digital image data, wherein measuring a variation of pixel values of the digital image data further comprises at least one of calculating an l 2 norm or order derived therefrom or calculating an l 1 norm or order derived therefrom: and

associating the variation of pixel values with a measure of risk for breast cancer, wherein the variation of pixel values correlates with at least one of a relative risk for breast cancer, an odds ratio for breast cancer, or an absolute risk prediction for breast cancer.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein measuring a variation of pixel values of the digital image data further comprises:

calculating an l 2 norm or order derived therefrom;

calculating an l 1 norm or order derived therefrom; and

calculating a combination of measures based on results of the l 2 norm or order derived therefrom and the l 1 norm or order derived therefrom.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein calculating a combination of measures further comprises at least one of using a linear method, using a non-linear method, or using a Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization process, Principal Component Analysis, partial least squares or kernel-based method.

17. The method of claim 14 , wherein the digital image data comprises an image having a breast tissue area and a background area, the method further comprising:

segmenting the breast tissue area from the background area of the image.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

assigning pixel values within the breast tissue area a first value; and

assigning pixel values within the background area a second value.

19. A method of assessing breast density for breast cancer risk applications, comprising:

receiving digital image data including a plurality of pixels;

measuring a variation of pixel values of the digital image data, wherein measuring a variation of pixel values of the digital image data further comprises calculating the variation using an n th central or non-central moment of an integer or a fractional order or any real number order; and

associating the variation of pixel values with a measure of risk for breast cancer, wherein the variation of pixel values correlates with at least one of a relative risk for breast cancer, an odds ratio for breast cancer, or an absolute risk prediction for breast cancer.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein calculating a variation of pixel values of the digital image data further comprises:

calculating a first n th central or non-central moment;

calculating a second n th central or non-central moment, the second n th central or non-central moment being different than the first n th central or non-central moment; and

calculating a combination of measures based on results of the first and second n th central or non-central moments using at least one of a linear method and a non-linear method.

21. The method of claim 19 , wherein the digital image data comprises an image having a breast tissue area and a background area, the method further comprising:

segmenting the breast tissue area from the background area of the image.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2014
From: HEINE, JOHN J.; SELLERS, THOMAS A.
To: H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC.
Reel/Frame 034005/0050 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 61423390 · Dec 15, 2010
Related Publication 20130272595A1 · Oct 17, 2013