IP Library Granted Patent US 9,355,571
Granted Patent B2
US 9,355,571 · App. 12/018,219 · Granted May 31, 2016

Modules and methods for biasing power to a multi-engine power plant suitable for one engine inoperative flight procedure training

Inventors: John Rucci (East Longmeadow, MA); Anthony Z. Stobiecki (Huntington, CT); Brent Davis (Oxford, CT); Christopher James Myers (Guilford, CT)
Assignee: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
G09B9/46A63H27/12B62D1/22B64C27/04G09B9/08G09B9/16G09B9/165G09B9/18G09B9/203G09B9/206G09B9/44B62D1/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,355,571
App. No.
12/018,219
Granted
May 31, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for conducting flight procedures training in a rotary-wing aircraft with a multi-engine powerplant includes determining a variable bias relative an available power margin to simulate a reduced power available flight condition; and displaying symbology indicative of the simulated reduced power available flight condition.

Claims (50)

1. A method for conducting flight procedures training in a rotary-wing aircraft with a multi-engine powerplant comprising:

continuously determining an instantaneous available power margin of the multi-engine powerplant system in real time;

continuously determining a variable bias relative to the instantaneous available power margin;

limiting a torque of each engine of the multi-engine powerplant system relative to the variable bias to simulate a reduced power available for a flight condition; and

displaying symbology indicative of the simulated reduced power available flight condition.

2. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said determining an available power margin further comprises:

utilizing current ambient conditions and current aircraft weight to determine the available power margin.

3. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

equally reducing a power from each engine of the multi-engine powerplant to simulate the reduced power available flight condition in response to the reduced power available flight condition such that said reduced power available flight condition will result in a rotor droop condition.

4. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein limiting the torque of each engine maintains level-loading of a main rotor gearbox.

5. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting the reduced power available flight condition based at least in part on a predefined aircraft weight.

6. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting the reduced power available flight condition based at least in part on a predefined maximum internal aircraft weight condition.

7. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting the reduced power available flight condition based at least in part on a predefined maximum external aircraft weight condition.

8. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting the reduced power available flight condition based at least in part on one engine inoperable (OEI) condition.

9. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

associating the reduced power available flight condition in relation to a one engine inoperable (OEI) condition at a predefined aircraft weight.

10. A method as recited in claim 9 , wherein said displaying symbology step further comprises:

randomly selecting one engine for simulated failure display symbology; and

displaying symbology indicative of the simulated failure of the selected engine.

11. A method as recited in claim 10 , wherein said displaying symbology step further comprises:

displaying a timer representing engine operation in response to the simulated operation when operating above a predetermined operational time limit.

12. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said displaying symbology step further comprises:

displaying symbology indicative that a training state is active.

13. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said displaying symbology step further comprises:

modifying symbology indicating turbine gas temperature (TGT) and engine torque of all engines of the multi-engine powerplant to indicate increases in TGT and engine torque to simulate an increase in aircraft weight.

14. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said displaying symbology step further comprises:

modifying symbology indicating turbine gas temperature (TGT) and engine torque of all engines of the multi-engine powerplant to indicate decreases in the TGT and engine torque to simulate decrease in aircraft weight.

15. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein said displaying symbology step further comprises:

displaying a symbology indicative of a First Limit Indicator (FLI) adjacent symbology indicative of a rotor torque.

16. A module for conducting flight procedures training in a rotary-wing aircraft, comprising:

a multi-engine powerplant system;

a cockpit instrument display system; and

an OEI/BIAS training system in communication with said multi-engine powerplant system and said cockpit instrument display system, said OEI/BIAS training system operable to continuously determine a variable bias relative to a continuously updated available power margin by limiting a torque of each engine of said multi-engine powerplant system to simulate a reduced power available flight condition, wherein the continuously updated available power margin is continuously updated in real time.

17. The module as recited in claim 16 , wherein said multi-engine powerplant system includes three engines.

18. The module as recited in claim 17 , wherein said training system operates to apply a symmetrical load limit on each of the three engines of the multi-engine powerplant system.

19. The module as recited in claim 16 , wherein said cockpit instrument display system is operable to display a TORQUE DISPLAY which expands to a QUAD TAC DISPLAY in response to a rotor droop condition.

20. The module as recited in claim 19 , wherein said QUAD TAC DISPLAY is operable to display a torque bar for each engine in response to the rotor droop condition.

21. The module as recited in claim 16 , wherein said cockpit instrument display system comprises an OEI/BIAS display operable to displays a multiple of selectable weight biases associated with a respective multiple of reduced power available flight conditions.

22. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

simulating releasing an external load; and

changing the torque of each engine of the multi-engine powerplant system to simulate the reduced power available flight condition related to an aircraft weight condition without the external load.

23. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

continuously calculating the available power margin from an actual aircraft weight and a desired training weight.

24. A method as recited in claim 23 , wherein the desired training weight is a maximum internal aircraft weight condition.

25. A method as recited in claim 23 , wherein the desired training weight is a maximum external aircraft weight condition.

26. A method as recited in claim 23 , wherein the desired training weight is a one engine inoperable (OEI) condition.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 18, 2008
From: MYERS, CHRISTOPHER JAMES
To: SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 020521/0533 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2008
From: RUCCI, JOHN; STOBIECKI, ANTHONY Z.; DAVIS, BRENT
To: SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 020399/0130 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20090186320A1 · Jul 23, 2009