Generation of wake-up words
View Patent ↗A method, system and tangible computer readable medium for generating one or more wake-up words are provided. For example, the method can include receiving a text representation of the one or more wake-up words. A strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words can be determined based on one or more static measures. The method can also include receiving an audio representation of the one or more wake-up words. A strength of the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words can be determined based on one or more dynamic measures. Feedback on the one or more wake-up words is provided (e.g., to an end user) based on the strengths of the text and audio representations.
1. A method for generating one or more wake-up words, the method comprising:
receiving, using a keyboard, a text representation of the one or more wake-up words;
determining a strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words based on one or more static measures, wherein the determining the strength of the text representation comprises applying a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence calculation between the one or more wake-up words and words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words;
comparing a result of the KL divergence calculation to a predetermined distance score associated with a decoding accuracy of a speech recognizer;
receiving, using a microphone, an audio representation of the one or more wake-up words;
determining a strength of the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words based on one or more dynamic measures; and
providing a message on a display device, wherein the message comprises one or more improvements to a likelihood that the speech recognizer recognizes the one or more wake-up words based on the strengths of the text and audio representations.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words comprises generating a first acoustic model for the text representation of the one or more wake-up words and a second acoustic model for one or more words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words comprises determining a number of syllables in the one or more wake-up words or determining a number of phonologically different groups of phonemes associated with the one or more wake-up words.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the applying the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence calculation comprises calculating a difference between a first probability distribution function associated with one or more phonemes of the one or more wake-up words and a second probability distribution function associated with the words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the strength of the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words comprises performing a voice activity detection on the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words, calculating one or more confidence scores for the one or more wake-up words or a combination thereof.
6. A system for generating one or more wake-up words, the system comprising:
an interface device configured to receive a text representation of the one more wake-up words and an audio representation of the one or more wake-up words;
a wake-up-word (WUW) processing engine configured to determine a strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words based on one or more static measures and to determine a strength of the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words based on one or more dynamic measures, wherein to determine the strength of the text representation, the WUW processing engine is configured to apply a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence calculation between the one or more wake-up words and words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words and compare a result of the KL divergence calculation to a predetermined distance score associated with a decoding accuracy of a speck recognizer; and
a display device configured to provide a message on one or more improvements to a likelihood that the speech recognizer recognizes the one or more wake-up words based on the strengths of the text and audio representations.
7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the interface device comprises a keyboard and a microphone.
8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the WUW processing engine is configured to generate a first acoustic model for the text representation of the one or more wake-up words and a second acoustic model for one or more words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words.
9. The system of claim 6 , wherein the WUW processing engine is configured to determine a number of syllables in the one or more wake-up words or determine a number of phonologically different groups of phonemes associated with the one or more wake-up words.
10. The system of claim 6 , wherein the WUW processing engine is configured to calculate a difference between a first probability distribution function associated with one or more phonemes of the one or more wake-up words and a second probability distribution function associated with the words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words for the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence calculation.
11. The system of claim 6 , wherein the WUW processing engine is configured to perform a voice activity detection on the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words, calculate one or more confidence scores for the one or more wake-up words or a combination thereof.
12. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored therein one or more sequences of one or more instructions for execution by one or more processors to perform a method for generating one or more wake-up words, the method comprising:
receiving, using a keyboard, a text representation of the one or more wake-up words;
determining a strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words based on one or more static measures, wherein the determining comprises applying a Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence calculation between the one or more wake-up words and words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words;
comparing a result to the KL divergence calculation to a predetermined distance score associated with a decoding accuracy of a speech recognizer;
receiving, using a microphone, an audio representation of the one or more wake-up words;
determining a strength of the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words based on one or more dynamic measures; and
providing a message on a display device, wherein the message comprises one or more improvements to a likelihood that the speech recognizer recognizes the one or more wake-up words based on the strengths of the text and audio representations.
13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the determining the strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words comprises generating a first acoustic model for the text representation of the one or more wake-up words and a second acoustic model for one or more words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words.
14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the determining the strength of the text representation of the one or more wake-up words comprises determining a number of syllables in the one or more wake-up words or determining a number of phonologically different groups of phonemes associated with the one or more wake-up words.
15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the applying the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence calculation comprises calculating a difference between a first probability distribution function associated with one or more phonemes of the one or more wake-up words and a second probability distribution function associated with the words unrelated to the one or more wake-up words.
16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the determining the strength of the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words comprises performing a voice activity detection on the audio representation of the one or more wake-up words, calculating one or more confidence scores for the one or more wake-up words or a combination thereof.
17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more improvements comprises at least one of a number of syllables in the one or more wake-up words, usage of different sounding words, proximity of a user to the microphone when uttering the audio representation, or a combination thereof.
18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
accepting the one or more wake-up words when the one or more wake-up words meet a static criteria associated with the text representation and a dynamic criteria associated with the audio representation.
19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
rejecting the one or more wake-up words when the one or more wake-up words do not meet a static criteria associated with the text representation or a dynamic criteria associated with the audio representation.
20. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the strength of the text representation comprises:
calculating a weighted average of the one or more static measures based on the one or more wake up words;
comparing the weighted average of the one or more static measures to a static criteria associated with the text representation.