IP Library Granted Patent US 9,460,404
Granted Patent B2
US 9,460,404 · App. 13/939,165 · Granted Oct 4, 2016

Scent delivery system scheduling

Inventors: John Thurston Chandler (Charlotte, NC); Chad Alan Morton (Fort Mill, SC)
Assignee: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
G06Q10/0631
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,460,404
App. No.
13/939,165
Granted
Oct 4, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling one or more scent delivery units includes maintaining one or more scheduled events, maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, and generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more scent delivery units to control their activation and deactivation. Generating the command data includes identifying a conflicting period of time during which control specified by the one or more scheduled events differs from control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events and also includes generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events. Control for the one or more scent delivery units during the conflicting period of time is in accordance with control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events and not the one or more scheduled events.

Claims (40)

1. A method for controlling one or more scent delivery devices, the method comprising:

providing one or more networked scent delivery devices;

maintaining one or more scheduled events, each scheduled event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated during a first time period, the first time period being defined by an activation start time and an activation end time;

maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, each scheduled anti-event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be deactivated during a second time period, the second time period being defined by a deactivation start time and a deactivation end time; and

generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more networked scent delivery devices to control activation and deactivation of the one or more networked scent delivery devices,

wherein generating the command data includes:

identifying a conflicting period of time between the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, wherein the conflicting period of time indicates a period of time during which the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated conflicts with the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be deactivated, and

generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events, control for the one or more networked scent delivery devices being in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events during the conflicting period of time and not in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time,

wherein generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events comprises generating command data that maintains priority of the control specified by the one or more anti-events over any additional conflicting scheduled events subsequently added to the scenting schedule.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events includes generating command data that disregards the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated during the conflicting period of time.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, based upon subsequent removal of the one or more anti-events, generating additional command data solely based on the one or more scheduled events.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the command data comprises generating command data that gives priority to control specified by a manual activation request over control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the command data comprises generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events over control specified by a manual activation request.

6. A scent delivery system, comprising:

one or more networked scent delivery devices; and

one or more computers and one or more storage devices storing instructions that are operable, if executed by the one or more computers, to cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

maintaining one or more scheduled events, each scheduled event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated during a first time period, the first time period being defined by an activation start time and an activation end time,

maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, each scheduled anti-event being associated with control logic that identifies the networked one or more scent delivery devices to be deactivated during a second time period, the second time period being defined by a deactivation start time and a deactivation end time, and

generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more networked scent delivery devices to control activation and deactivation of the one or more scent delivery devices,

wherein generating the command data includes:

identifying a conflicting period of time between the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, wherein the conflicting period of time indicates a period of time during which the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated conflicts with the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be deactivated, and

generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events, control for the one or more networked scent delivery devices being in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events during the conflicting period of time and not in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time,

wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that maintains priority of the control specified by the one or more anti-events over any additional conflicting scheduled events subsequently added to the scenting schedule.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that disregards the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated.

8. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more storage devices further store instructions for generating, based upon subsequent removal of the one or more anti-events, additional command data solely based on the one or more scheduled events.

9. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that gives priority to control specified by a manual activation request over control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events.

10. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events over control specified by a manual activation request.

11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing software comprising instructions executable by one or more computers, which, upon such execution, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

providing one or more networked scent delivery devices;

maintaining one or more scheduled events, each scheduled event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated during a first time period, the first time period being defined by an activation start time and an activation end time;

maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, each scheduled anti-event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be deactivated during a second time period, the second time period being defined by a deactivation start time and a deactivation end time; and

generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more networked scent delivery devices to control activation and deactivation of the one or more networked scent delivery devices,

wherein generating the command data includes:

identifying a conflicting period of time between the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, wherein the conflicting period of time indicates a period of time during which the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated conflicts with the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be deactivated, and

generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events, control for the one or more networked scent delivery devices being in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events during the conflicting period of time and not in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time,

wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that maintains priority of the control specified by the one or more anti-events over any additional conflicting scheduled events subsequently added to the scenting schedule.

12. The medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that disregards the control logic that identifies the one or more networked scent delivery devices to be activated during the conflicting period of time.

13. The medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise, based upon subsequent removal of the one or more anti-events, generating additional command data solely based on the one or more scheduled events.

14. The medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that gives priority to control specified by a manual activation request over control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events.

15. The medium of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events over control specified by a manual activation request.

Assignments (9)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2026
From: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: GLAS AGENCY (HONG KONG) LIMITED
Reel/Frame 073710/0984 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL RECORDED AT REEL 051606, FRAME 0532 Recorded Feb 4, 2026
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 074613/0667 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2020
From: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 051606/0532 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Jan 24, 2020
From: ANTARES CAPITAL LP
To: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 051693/0793 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2019
From: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: ANTARES CAPITAL LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 049815/0446 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2019
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 049815/0815 →
NOTICE OF ASSIGNEE'S ADDRESS CHANGE Recorded Oct 12, 2018
From: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047222/0731 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2015
From: CHANDLER, JOHN THURSTON; MORTON, CHAD ALAN
To: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 037243/0824 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 30, 2014
From: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 034599/0209 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20150019041A1 · Jan 15, 2015