Method for allocating spatial resources
A method for allocating spatial resources including steps of: providing a store layout; assigning categories to locations in the store layout, calculating a total score for the first store layout; and implementing the category assignments in a store.
1. A method for allocating spatial resources, the method comprising steps of:
a) providing a store layout;
b) assigning categories to locations in the store layout, creating a first store layout with assigned category locations;
c) translating the store layout with assigned category locations into a first distance relationship matrix;
d) providing an ideal category relationship matrix, wherein the ideal category relationship matrix provides an indication of how closely pairs of categories are related to each other;
e) calculating a total score for the first store layout with assigned category locations by comparing the first distance relationship matrix to the ideal category relationship matrix;
f) implementing the category assignments in a store.
2. The method according to claim 1 further comprising calculating the total score according to a category importance factor.
3. The method according to claim 1 further comprising calculating the total score according to category layout penalties.
4. The method according to claim 1 further comprising calculating the total score according to a coherence factor.
5. The method according to claim 1 further comprising calculating the total score according to a category adjacency score threshold.
6. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising steps of:
g) swapping the assigned locations of at least two categories in the store layout creating a second store layout with assigned category locations;
h) translating the second store layout with assigned category locations into a second distance relationship matrix;
i) calculating a total score for the second store layout with assigned category locations by comparing the second distance relationship matrix to the ideal category relationship matrix;
j) selecting the store layout with assigned categories having the most favorable comparison to the ideal category relationship matrix.
7. The method according to claim 6 further comprising calculating the total score according to a category importance factor.
8. The method according to claim 6 further comprising calculating the total score according to category layout penalties.
9. The method according to claim 6 further comprising calculating the total score according to a coherence factor.
10. The method according to claim 6 further comprising calculating the total score according to a category adjacency score threshold.
11. The method according to claim 1 further comprising steps of:
k) calculating an opportunity score associated with at least one pair of categories;
l) changing the relative locations of two categories according to a calculated opportunity score;
m) implementing the category assignment of one member of the set.
12. The method according to claim 11 further comprising calculating the total score according to a category importance factor.
13. The method according to claim 11 further comprising calculating the total score according to category layout penalties.
14. The method according to claim 11 further comprising calculating the total score according to a coherence factor.
15. The method according to claim 11 further comprising calculating the total score according to a category adjacency score threshold.