Method and system for verifying scenario based test selection, execution and reporting

1. A computer implemented method for testing a software application, the method comprising:

obtaining, by a processor, user requirements, wherein the user requirements are indicative of functionalities and features to be incorporated in the software application;

identifying, by the processor, based on the user requirements, at least one test scenario for testing the software application, the at least one test scenario includes at least one step, wherein the at least one step are temporal steps of progression;

associating, by the processor, one or more test cases with the at least one step of the at least one test scenario upon receiving a first approval from a user, wherein the first approval is indicative of validity of the at least one test scenario;

executing, by the processor, based on a second approval received from the user, the one or more test cases for testing the software application, wherein the second approval is indicative of validity of the one or more test cases; and

generating, by the processor, an evaluation report comprising details pertaining to the software testing, wherein the details include the user requirements, different versions of the at least one test scenario with unique IDs, at least one step of each test scenario, one or more test cases associates with each step, a time stamp, parameters involved in each test case, bugs, corrective measures for fixing each bug and areas of improvement of the software application.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising allocating a unique ID to each interaction between the user and a tester to track testing of the software application, wherein the interaction pertains to at least one of the user requirements, validation of the at least one test scenario, validation of the one or more test cases associated with the at least one test scenario, and the evaluation report.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising modifying the at least one test scenario, based on inputs received from the user, wherein the user does not provide the first approval.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising modifying the one or more test cases associated with the at least one step of the at least one test scenario, based on inputs received from the user, wherein the second approval is not received from the user.

5. A software testing system for testing a software application, the software testing system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory in communication with the processor, wherein the processor executes instructions within a plurality of modules stored in the memory, wherein the plurality of modules comprise:

an identification module, to,

obtain user requirements from a user, wherein the user requirements are indicative of functionalities and features to be incorporated in the software application; and

identify, based on the user requirements, at least one test scenario for testing the software application, the at least one test scenario includes at least one step, wherein the at least one step are temporal steps of progression; and

a testing module, to,

associate one or more test cases with the at least one step of the at least one test scenario upon receiving a first approval from the user, wherein the first approval is indicative of validity of the at least one test scenario;

execute, based on a second approval received from the user, the one or more test cases for testing the software application, wherein the second approval is indicative of validity of the one or more test cases; and

generate, by the processor, an evaluation report comprising details pertaining to the software testing, wherein the details include the user requirements, different versions of the at least one test scenario with unique IDs, at least one step of each test scenario, one or more test cases associates with each step, a time stamp, parameters involved in each test case, bugs, corrective measures for fixing each bug and areas of improvement of the software application.

6. The software testing system as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the testing module further allocates a unique ID to each interaction between the user and a tester to track testing of the software application, wherein the interaction pertains to at least one of the user requirements, validation of the at least one test scenario, validation of the one or more test cases associated with the at least one test scenario, and the evaluation report.

7. The software testing system as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the identification module further,

modifies the at least one test scenario, based on inputs received from the user, when the user does not provide the first approval; and

modifies the one or more test cases associated with the at least one test scenario, based on inputs received from the user, wherein the second approval is not received from the user.

8. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having embodied thereon a computer program for executing a method for testing a software application, the method comprising:

obtaining, by a processor, user requirements from a user, wherein the user requirements are indicative of functionalities and features to be incorporated in the software application;

identifying, by the processor, based on the user requirements, at least one test scenario for testing the software application, the at least one test scenario includes at least one step, wherein the at least one step are temporal steps of progression;

associating, by the processor, one or more test cases with the at least one step of the at least one test scenario upon receiving a first approval from the user, wherein the first approval is indicative of validity of the at least one test scenario;

executing, by the processor, based on a second approval received from the user, the one or more test cases for testing the software application, wherein the second approval is indicative of validity of the one or more test cases; and

generating, by the processor, an evaluation report comprising details pertaining to the software testing, wherein the details include the user requirements, different versions of the at least one test scenario with unique IDs, at least one step of each test scenario, one or more test cases associates with each step, a time stamp, parameters involved in each test case, bugs, corrective measures for fixing each bug and areas of improvement of the software application.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as claimed in claim 8 further comprising allocating a unique ID to each interaction between the user and a tester to track testing of the software application, wherein the interaction pertains to at least one of the user requirements, validation of the at least one test scenario, validation of the one or more test cases associated with the at least one test scenario, and the evaluation report.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as claimed in claim 8 further comprising modifying the at least one test scenario, based on inputs received from the user, wherein the user does not provide the first approval.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium as claimed in claim 8 further comprising modifying the one or more test cases associated with the at least one step of the at least one test scenario, based on inputs received from the user, wherein the second approval is not received from the user.