IP Library Granted Patent US 9,646,428
Granted Patent B1
US 9,646,428 · App. 14/713,226 · Granted May 9, 2017

Accident response using autonomous vehicle monitoring

Inventors: Blake Konrardy (Bloomington, IL); Scott T. Christensen (Salem, OR); Gregory Hayward (Bloomington, IL); Scott Farris (Bloomington, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G07C5/08H04L67/12H04L67/20H04W4/046H04W4/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,646,428
App. No.
14/713,226
Granted
May 9, 2017
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and systems are provided for monitoring use of a vehicle having one or more autonomous (and/or semi-autonomous) operation features to determine and respond to incidents, such as collisions, thefts, or breakdowns. According to certain aspects, operating data from sensors within or near the vehicle may be used to determine when an incident has occurred and determine an appropriate response. The responses may include contacting a third party to provide assistance, such as local emergency services. In some embodiments, occurrence of the incident may be verified by automated communication with the vehicle operator.

Claims (46)

1. A computer-implemented method for monitoring a vehicle having one or more autonomous operation features for controlling the vehicle, comprising:

receiving, at one or more processors, operating data regarding operation of the vehicle, wherein the operating data includes information from one or more sensors disposed within the vehicle and information regarding operation of the one or more autonomous operation features;

determining, by one or more processors, the occurrence of an incident involving the vehicle and a type of the incident based at least in part upon the received operating data during operation of the vehicle, including the information regarding operation of the one or more autonomous operation features;

determining, by one or more processors, a response to the incident based at least in part upon the received operating data, wherein the response includes a request for assistance from an emergency service provider, which request and emergency service provider are determined based upon the type of the incident; and

causing, by one or more processors, the response to be implemented at least in part by transmitting the request for assistance to the emergency service provider via a network.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the incident includes one or more of the following: a collision, an accident, an indication of hard braking, an indication of hard acceleration, an indication of evasive maneuvering, a loss of traction, an indication of objects within a threshold distance from the vehicle, an indication of unauthorized access to the autonomous operation features by an external source, or an indication of attempted unauthorized access to the autonomous operation features by an external source.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the incident includes one or more of the following: a component failure, inconsistent readings from a plurality of sensors within the vehicle, an engine malfunction, a flat tire, or an empty fuel tank.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the request for assistance includes information regarding one or more of the following: the vehicle's location, one or more types of assistance required, other vehicles involved in the incident, pedestrians involved in the incident, vehicle operators involved in the incident, or passengers involved in the incident.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the emergency service provider includes one or more of the following: local police, state highway patrols, fire departments, emergency medical services, or ambulance services.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

contacting, by the network, the vehicle operator to verify the determination of the occurrence of the incident; and

receiving, by the network, a verification response from the vehicle operator, and

wherein the response to the incident is determined at least in part based upon the verification response from the vehicle operator.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the operating data includes communication data from external sources.

8. A computer system for monitoring a vehicle having one or more autonomous operation features for controlling the vehicle, comprising:

one or more processors;

one or more communication modules adapted to communicate data; and

a non-transitory program memory coupled to the one or more processors and storing executable instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the computer system to:

receive operating data regarding operation of the vehicle, wherein the operating data includes information from one or more sensors disposed within the vehicle and information regarding operation of the one or more autonomous operation features;

determine the occurrence of an incident involving the vehicle and a type of the incident based at least in part upon the received operating data during operation of the vehicle, including the information regarding operation of the one or more autonomous operation features;

determine a response to the incident based at least in part upon the received operating data, wherein the response includes a request for assistance from an emergency service provider, which request and emergency service provider are determined based upon the type of the incident; and

cause the response to be implemented at least in part by transmitting the request for assistance to the emergency service provider via the one or more communication modules.

9. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the incident includes one or more of the following: a collision, an accident, an indication of hard braking, an indication of hard acceleration, an indication of evasive maneuvering, a loss of traction, an indication of objects within a threshold distance from the vehicle, an indication of unauthorized access to the autonomous operation features by an external source, or an indication of attempted unauthorized access to the autonomous operation features by an external source.

10. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the incident includes one or more of the following: a component failure, inconsistent readings from a plurality of sensors within the vehicle, an engine malfunction, a flat tire, or an empty fuel tank.

11. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the request for assistance includes information regarding one or more of the following: the vehicle's location, one or more types of assistance required, other vehicles involved in the incident, pedestrians involved in the incident, vehicle operators involved in the incident, or passengers involved in the incident.

12. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the emergency service provider includes one or more of the following: local police, state highway patrols, fire departments, emergency medical services, or ambulance services.

13. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the instruction further cause the computer system to:

contact the vehicle operator to verify the determination of the occurrence of the incident; and

receive a verification response from the vehicle operator,

wherein the response to the incident is determined at least in part based upon the verification response from the vehicle operator.

14. The computer system of claim 8 , wherein the operating data includes communication data from external sources.

15. A tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions for monitoring a vehicle having one or more autonomous operation features for controlling the vehicle that, when executed by at least one processor of a computer system, cause the computer system to:

receive operating data regarding operation of the vehicle, wherein the operating data includes information from one or more sensors disposed within the vehicle and information regarding operation of the one or more autonomous operation features;

determine the occurrence of an incident involving the vehicle and a type of the incident based at least in part upon the received operating data during operation of the vehicle, including the information regarding operation of the one or more autonomous operation features;

determine a response to the incident based at least in part upon the received operating data, wherein the response includes a request for assistance from an emergency service provider, which request and emergency service provider are determined based upon the type of the incident; and

cause the response to be implemented at least in part by transmitting the request for assistance to the emergency service provider via a network.

16. The tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the incident includes one or more of the following: a collision, an accident, an indication of hard braking, an indication of hard acceleration, an indication of evasive maneuvering, a loss of traction, an indication of objects within a threshold distance from the vehicle, an indication of unauthorized access to the autonomous operation features by an external source, or an indication of attempted unauthorized access to the autonomous operation features by an external source.

17. The tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the incident includes one or more of the following: a component failure, inconsistent readings from a plurality of sensors within the vehicle, an engine malfunction, a flat tire, or an empty fuel tank.

18. The tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein:

the request for assistance includes information regarding one or more of the following: the vehicle's location, one or more types of assistance required, other vehicles involved in the incident, pedestrians involved in the incident, vehicle operators involved in the incident, or passengers involved in the incident; and

the emergency service provider includes one or more of the following: local police, state highway patrols, fire departments, emergency medical services, or ambulance services.

19. The tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computer system, cause the computer system to:

contact the vehicle operator to verify the determination of the occurrence of the incident; and

receive a verification response from the vehicle operator,

wherein the response to the incident is determined at least in part based upon the verification response from the vehicle operator.

20. The tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the operating data includes communication data from external sources.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2015
From: KONRARDY, BLAKE; CHRISTENSEN, SCOTT T.; HAYWARD, GREGORY; FARRIS, SCOTT
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 035651/0075 →
Continuity (17)
Provisional Application 62000878 · May 20, 2014
Provisional Application 62018169 · Jun 27, 2014
Provisional Application 62035660 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035669 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035723 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035729 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035769 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035780 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035832 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035859 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035867 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035878 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035980 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62035983 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62036090 · Aug 11, 2014
Provisional Application 62047307 · Sep 8, 2014
Provisional Application 62056893 · Sep 29, 2014