IP Library Granted Patent US 9,768,840
Granted Patent B2
US 9,768,840 · App. 15/231,596 · Granted Sep 19, 2017

Distributed antenna system for MIMO communications

Inventors: Pier Faccin (Faenza, IT); Luigi Tarlazzi (Bagnacavallo, IT)
Assignee: Andrew Wireless Systems GmbH
H04B7/0413H04B7/022H04B7/026H04B7/0691H04B17/309H04B7/0426H04B7/0452H04B7/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,768,840
App. No.
15/231,596
Granted
Sep 19, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for determining placement of a plurality of antennas of a distributed antenna system for handling MIMO signals includes, at a first location, simulating the communication of a first MIMO signal by a first remote unit over an air interface in an environment and, at a second location, simulating the communication of a second MIMO signal by a second remote unit over an air interface in the environment. The first and second locations are arranged within the environment to provide overlapping signal coverage of both the first MIMO signal and the second MIMO signal at a third location in the environment. Analysis is made of at least an imbalance of received power between the first and second MIMO signals within the environment at a third location in order to determine whether a desired capacity for MIMO communications with the system has been achieved at the third location.

Claims (50)

1. A method for determining placement of a plurality of simulated antennas of a simulated distributed antenna system for handling simulated MIMO signals in a simulated environment comprising:

at a first simulated location within the simulated environment, simulating communication of a first simulated MIMO signal by a first remote unit over a first simulated air interface in the simulated environment;

at a second simulated location within the simulated environment, simulating communication of a second simulated MIMO signal by a second remote unit over a second simulated air interface in the simulated environment;

the first simulated location and the second simulated location arranged within the simulated environment to provide overlapping simulated signal coverage of both the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal at a third simulated location in the simulated environment; and

analyzing at least a simulated imbalance of simulated received power between the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal within the simulated environment at a third simulated location in order to determine whether a desired capacity for simulated MIMO communications with the simulated distributed antenna system is achieved at the third simulated location in the simulated environment.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of simulating communication of the first simulated MIMO signal and simulating communication of the second simulated MIMO signal in the simulated environment includes positioning a simulated remote unit at a respective simulated location within the simulated environment and simulating communication of a respective simulated MIMO signal over a respective simulated air interface.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a simulated signal-to-noise and interference ratio associated with at least one of the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal at the third simulated location in the simulated environment.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

determining a simulated channel condition number associated with the simulated distributed antenna system from the analyzed simulated imbalance.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

determining a simulated capacity for the simulated distributed antenna system from the simulated signal-to-noise and interference ratio and the simulated channel condition number.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

determining that the simulated capacity for the simulated distributed antenna system does not meet a predetermined capacity threshold; and

adjusting the simulated location of deployment of the simulation of at least one of the simulated MIMO signals.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether the analyzed simulated imbalance is less than a predetermined threshold.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising:

in response to determining that the analyzed simulated imbalance is less than the predetermined threshold, determining whether to increase or decrease the analyzed simulated imbalance.

9. A computing system configured to simulate determination of placement of a plurality of simulated antennas of a simulated distributed antenna system for handling simulated MIMO signals in a simulated environment, the computing system comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory communicatively coupled to the at least one processor;

the at least one processor configured to simulate communication of a first simulated MIMO signal from a first remote unit at a first simulated location over a first simulated air interface in the simulated environment;

the at least one processor further configured to simulate communication of a second simulated MIMO signal from a second remote unit at a second simulated location over a second simulated air interface in the simulated environment;

the first simulated location and the second simulated location arranged within the simulated environment to provide overlapping simulated signal coverage of both the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal at a third simulated location in the simulated environment; and

the at least one processor further configured to analyze at least an imbalance of simulated received power between the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal within the simulated environment at a third simulated location in order to determine whether a desired capacity for simulated MIMO communications with the simulated distributed antenna system is achieved at the third simulated location in the simulated environment.

10. The computing system of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor being configured to at least one of simulate communication of the first simulated MIMO signal and simulate communication of the second simulated MIMO signal in the simulated environment includes the at least one processor being configured to position a simulated remote unit at a respective simulated location within the simulated environment and to simulate communication of a respective simulated MIMO signal over a respective simulated air interface.

11. The computing system of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a simulated signal-to-noise and interference ratio that is associated with at least one of the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal.

12. The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a simulated channel condition number associated with the simulated distributed antenna system from the analyzed simulated imbalance.

13. The computing system of claim 12 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a simulated capacity of the simulated distributed antenna system from the signal-to-noise and interference ratio and the channel condition number.

14. The computing system of claim 13 wherein the at least one processor is further configured to compare the simulated capacity for the simulated distributed antenna system to a predetermined capacity threshold.

15. The computing system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to access a datastore including capacity information.

16. The computing system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine whether to increase or decrease the simulated imbalance in response to determining that the simulated imbalance is less than the predetermined threshold.

17. The computing system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

determine that the simulated capacity for the simulated distributed antenna system does not meet a predetermined capacity threshold; and

adjust the simulated location of deployment of the simulation of at least one of the simulated MIMO signals.

18. The computing system of claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:

determine whether the analyzed simulated imbalance is less than a predetermined threshold; and

determine whether to increase or decrease the analyzed simulated imbalance in response to determining that the analyzed simulated imbalance is less than the predetermined threshold.

19. An apparatus for simulating determination of placement of a plurality of simulated antennas of a simulated distributed antenna system for handling simulated MIMO signals in a simulated environment, the apparatus including:

at least one circuit configured to simulate communication of a first simulated MIMO signal from a first remote unit at a first simulated location over a first simulated air interface in the simulated environment;

the at least one circuit further configured to simulate communication of a second simulated MIMO signal from a second remote unit at a second simulated location over a second simulated air interface in the simulated environment;

the first simulated location and the second simulated location arranged within the simulated environment to provide overlapping simulated signal coverage of both the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal at a third simulated location in the simulated environment; and

the at least one circuit further configured to analyze at least an imbalance of simulated received power between the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal within the simulated environment at a third simulated location in order to determine whether a desired capacity for simulated MIMO communications with the simulated distributed antenna system is achieved at the third simulated location in the simulated environment.

20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the at least one circuit is further configured to:

determine a simulated signal-to-noise and interference ratio that is associated with at least one of the first simulated MIMO signal and the second simulated MIMO signal;

determine a simulated channel condition number associated with the simulated distributed antenna system from the analyzed simulated imbalance;

determine a simulated capacity of the simulated distributed antenna system from the signal-to-noise and interference ratio and the channel condition number; and

compare the simulated capacity for the simulated distributed antenna system to a predetermined capacity threshold; and

determine whether to increase or decrease the simulated imbalance in response to determining that the simulated imbalance is less than the predetermined threshold.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 049905/0504 Recorded Dec 19, 2024
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC (F/K/A ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.); ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; RUCKUS WIRELESS, LLC (F/K/A RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 071477/0255 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST
Reel/Frame 060752/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 049892/0051 →
ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049892/0396 →
TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049905/0504 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR'S NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 039626 FRAME: 0188. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 20, 2017
From: FACCIN, PIER; TARLAZZI, LUIGI
To: ANDREW LLC
Reel/Frame 042417/0948 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2016
From: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: ANDREW WIRELESS SYSTEMS GMBH
Reel/Frame 039626/0230 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2016
From: FACCIN, PEIR; TARLAZZI, LUIGI
To: ANDREW LLC
Reel/Frame 039626/0188 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 2, 2016
From: ANDREW LLC
To: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 039916/0289 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 14291321 · May 30, 2014
Continuation 13025697 · Feb 11, 2011
Continuation PCTUS2011023991 · Feb 8, 2011
Related Publication 20160352397A1 · Dec 1, 2016