IP Library Granted Patent US 6,915,285
Granted Patent B2
US 6,915,285 · App. 10/442,571 · Granted Jul 5, 2005

Feature interaction resolution using fuzzy rules

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,915,285
App. No.
10/442,571
Granted
Jul 5, 2005
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of detecting feature interaction conflicts between agents in response to events in a multi-agent system comprises posting said events as tuples and event requests as anti-tuples from said agents in said multi-agent system, receiving said events and said event requests in a tuple space, generating responses to each of said agents for said events which match said event requests of said agents, wherein feature interaction conflict is detected when more than one of said agents are to exert control over an event.

Claims (35)

1. A computer-implemented method of detecting feature interaction conflicts between agents in response to events in a multi-agent system, comprising:

posting said events as tuples and event requests as anti-tuples from said agents in said multi-agent system;

receiving said events and said event requests in a tuple space; and

generating responses to each of said agents for said events which match said event requests of said agents; and

detecting a feature interaction conflict when more than one of said agents are to exert control over an event.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein feature interaction conflict is also detected when an agent requesting an event refines permission for a suggested action by another agent exerting control over the event.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein said event requests are posted as one of either event notification by which said agents requesting said event requests are to be notified of an occurrence of certain events, or event handling by which said agents requesting said event requests are to exert control over associated events.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein said event requests are posted as one of either event notification by which said agents requesting said event requests are to be notified of an occurrence of certain events, or event handling by which said agents requesting said event requests are to exert control over associated events.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising invoking an arbitration mechanism for resolving said feature interaction conflict over said events between said agents.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising invoking an arbitration mechanism for resolving said feature interaction conflict over said events between said agents.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , further comprising invoking an arbitration mechanism for resolving said feature interaction conflict over said events between said agents.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising invoking an arbitration mechanism for resolving said feature interaction conflict over said events between said agents.

9. A computer-implemented event based model for detecting feature-interaction conflict in a multi-agent system comprising:

an Event Agent for posting events as tuples and event requests as anti-tuples from agents in said multi-agent system; and

a Blackboard having a tuple space for receiving said events and said event requests posted by said Event Agent and generating responses to each of said agents for said events which match said event requests of said agents; and

wherein the computer-implemented event based model is operable to detect a feature interaction conflict when more than one of said agents are to exert control over an event.

10. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 9 , wherein feature interaction conflict is also detected when an agent requesting an event refuses permission for a suggested action by another agent exerting control over the event.

11. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 9 , wherein said Event Agent includes means for posting said event requests as one of either event notification by which said agents requesting said event requests are to be notified of an occurrence of certain events, or event handling by which said agents requesting said event requests are to exert control over associated events.

12. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 10 , wherein said Event Agent includes means for posting said event requests as one of either event notification by which said agents requesting said event requests are to be notified of an occurrence of certain events, or event handling by which said agents requesting said event requests are to exert control over associated events.

13. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 9 , further comprising an Arbitrator for resolving conflicting control over said events between said agents.

14. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 10 , further comprising an Arbitrator for resolving conflicting control over said events between said agents.

15. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 11 , further comprising an Arbitrator for resolving conflicting control over said events between said agents.

16. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 12 , further comprising an Arbitrator for resolving conflicting control over said events between said agents.

17. In a multi-agent system using a tuple space for communicating between a plurality of agents, a computer-implemented method of resolving feature interaction conflicts between said agents, the computer-implemented method comprising:

assigning fuzzy parameters of various degrees of truth for defining user preferences to attributes of rules associated with responses of said agents and to events of said agents;

detecting a feature interaction conflict for an event of a requesting agent posted on said tuple space which causes at least one conflicting response from at least one recipient agent;

opening a communications channel on said tuple space for posting said event with a degree of truth from said requesting agent and suggested responses with said degrees of truth from said at least one recipient agent; and

comparing said degree of truth and said degrees of truth of respectively said event and said suggested responses, and then selecting one of said suggested responses having the highest degree of truth as a response to said event.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 , wherein said at least one recipient agent provides at least one suggested response.

19. In a multi-agent system using a tuple space for communicating between a plurality of agents, a computer-implemented event based model for resolving feature interaction conflicts between said agents, the event based model comprising:

an Event Agent for posting events of said agents where said agents assign fuzzy parameters of various degrees of truth for defining user preferences to attributes of rules associated with responses of said agents and to said events of said agents;

a Blackboard having said tuple space for receiving said events posted by said Event Agent; and

an Arbitrator for detecting an feature interaction conflict to an event of a requesting agent posted on said Blackboard which causes at least one conflicting response from at least one recipient agent, and for opening a communications channel on said tuple space to post said event with a degree of truth from said requesting agent and suggested responses with said degrees of truth from said at least one recipient agent, and comparing said degree of truth and said degrees of truth of respectively said event and said suggested responses, and then selecting one of said suggested responses having the highest degree of truth as a response to said event.

20. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 19 , wherein said at least one recipient agent provides at least one suggested response.

21. The computer-implemented event based model of claim 19 , wherein the plurality of agents that are not participating in the feature interaction conflicts are not guaranteed to respond to the selected one of said suggested responses.

Assignments (22)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2025
From: ANKURA TRUST COMPANY, LLC
To: MITEL (DELAWARE), INC.; MITEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; MITEL CLOUD SERVICES, INC.; MITEL NETWORKS, INC.; MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 071722/0721 →
NOTICE OF SUCCESSION OF AGENCY - 5L Recorded Jan 14, 2025
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS LEGAL SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: ANKURA TRUST COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 069897/0046 →
NOTICE OF SUCCESSION OF AGENCY - 4L Recorded Jan 14, 2025
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS LEGAL SUCCESSOR TO CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: ANKURA TRUST COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 069896/0827 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2018
From: MITEL NETWORKS ULC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047741/0674 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2018
From: MITEL NETWORKS ULC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 047741/0704 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2018
From: CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
To: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 048096/0785 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2017
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., (ACTING THROUGH ITS CANADA BRANCH), AS CANADIAN COLLATERAL AGENT
To: MITEL US HOLDINGS, INC.; MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION; MITEL (DELAWARE), INC.; MITEL NETWORKS, INC.; MITEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; MITEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 042244/0461 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2017
From: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
To: CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 042107/0378 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2015
From: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.(ACTING THROUGH ITS CANADA BRANCH), AS CANADIAN COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 035783/0540 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2015
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS THE COLLATERAL AGENT
To: MITEL US HOLDINGS, INC.; MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION; MITEL COMMUNICATIONS INC. FKA AASTRA USA INC.
Reel/Frame 035562/0157 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 14, 2014
From: MITEL US HOLDINGS, INC.; MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION; AASTRA USA INC.
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS THE COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 032264/0760 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2014
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION; MITEL US HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 032210/0245 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION; MITEL US HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 032167/0464 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2013
From: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE; MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED; MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030264/0470 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 8, 2013
From: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, N.A., AS SECOND COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030201/0743 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 8, 2013
From: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030186/0894 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Apr 2, 2013
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FKA WILMINGTON TRUST FSB/MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
To: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 030165/0776 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 13, 2007
From: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
To: MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 019817/0847 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 13, 2007
From: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
To: MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 019817/0881 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2007
From: MITEL CORPORATION
To: MITEL KNOWLEDGE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019795/0051 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2007
From: GRAY, TOM; KARMOUCH, AHMED; AMER, MAGDI; MANKOVSKII, SERGE
To: MITEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019795/0046 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2005
From: MITEL KNOWLEDGE CORPORATION
To: MITEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 016164/0677 →