Look-across system
A system and method configured to look across programs, and more specifically, to a look-across program application used to update large and complex amounts of information. The information updated may be FMEA (failure modes and effects analysis) reports. Multiple FMEA reports are updated efficiently according to common attributes between products/processes to other products/processes. The updating is performed logic that cycles through each report once an update is made and looks to other applications to find products/processes with common attributes.
1 . A method of updating large and complex amounts of information, said method comprising:
identifying at least one item in a list having at least one common attribute with a predetermined item;
listing said item having common attributes with said predetermined item;
requesting further information from a user to determine a recommended action;
updating said listing of said item with said recommended action; and
notifying a predetermined team of said updated listing.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said predetermined item includes a predetermined product or process.
3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein said at least one item includes at least one product or process.
4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein said at least one product or process is substantially similar to said predetermined product or process.
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying at least one item having at least one common attribute with a predetermined item comprises identifying a plurality of items having at least one common attribute with a predetermined item.
6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein said list is a plurality of failure mode and effects analysis reports.
7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein said requesting further information from said user comprises asking at least one question to said user to determine at least one recommended action.
8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein asking at least one question to said user comprises asking three questions to said user.
9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein said three question comprise:
What failure mode/effects to look for?
What is said recommended action?
What message to send to said predetermined team?
10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying at least one item in said list having at least one common attribute with said predetermined item is accomplished by a software program.
11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said listing said item having common attributes with said predetermined item is accomplished by a software program.
12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said requesting further information from said user to determine a recommended action is accomplished by a software program.
13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein said requesting further information from said user is accomplished by a macro program.
14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said updating said listing of said item with said recommended action is accomplished by a software program.
15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein said updating said listing is accomplished by a macro program.
16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein said notifying a predetermined team of said updated listing.
17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein said notifying said predetermined team is accomplished by a macro program.
18 . A method of updating large and complex amounts of information, said method comprising:
determining common attributes a process or product has to other processes or products contained in a list;
generating a second list of said other processes or products;
asking a set of predetermined questions to a user to determine recommended actions;
generating a third list of said other processes or products based on answers to said questions;
opening individual modules of said other processes or products on said third list;
updating said individual modules with said recommended action; and
notifying a predetermined team of said updated individual modules.
19 . The method of claim 18 , further comprising viewing each said individual module.
20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein said first list is a plurality of failure mode and effects analysis reports stored in a database.
21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein said updating said individual modules with said recommended action comprises updating said failure mode and effects analysis reports with recommended actions.
22 . A look across system comprising:
storage storing a plurality of reports;
a plurality of commands to determine what common attributes said reports have with a predetermined report;
a filter that generates a list for automatic updates to said reports;
a processor that requests additional information from a user;
logic that automatically cycles through each report and opens reports having common attributes to said predetermined report for updating recommended action;
wherein said logic will add said recommended action to said reports.
23 . The system of claim 22 , wherein said processor requests additional information from said user by asking said user: what to look for, what is at least one recommended action, and what message to send.
24 . The system of claim 23 , wherein said reports comprise failure mode and effects analysis reports.
25 . The system of claim 24 , wherein said predetermined report comprises a predetermined failure mode and effects analysis report.
26 . The system of claim 25 , wherein said message to send is sent to failure mode and effects analysis teams.
27 . The system of claim 26 wherein said message is sent by e-mail.
28 . The system of claim 27 , wherein said logic is a macro.
29 . The system of claim 28 , wherein said macro is an Excel macro or other Microsoft Windows based macro.
30 . The system of claim 29 , wherein said updating is performed automatically.
31 . The system of claim 30 , wherein said storage is a Plexus system.