IP Library Granted Patent US 8,457,841
Granted Patent B2
US 8,457,841 · App. 11/939,698 · Granted Jun 4, 2013

Suspension system with optimized damping response

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,457,841
App. No.
11/939,698
Granted
Jun 4, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

An analytical methodology for the specification of progressive optimal compression damping of a suspension system to negotiate severe events, yet provides very acceptable ride quality and handling during routine events. In a broad aspect, the method provides a progressive optimal unconstrained damping response of the wheel assembly with respect to the body. In a preferred aspect, the method provides a progressive optimal constrained damping response of the wheel assembly with respect to the body, wherein below a predetermined velocity a conventional damper force is retained.

Claims (188)

1. A method for providing a suspension system with optimized damper response, wherein a sprung mass is suspended by the suspension system, the suspension system including a wheel assembly having a wheel center and a mass, m, a nonlinear damper wherein the damper is connected between the sprung mass and the wheel assembly, and a spring having a predetermined spring force, F(x), as a function of displacement of the wheel relative to the sprung mass wherein the spring is connected between the sprung mass and the wheel assembly, said method comprising the steps of:

providing a substantially constant total force, F(L), on the wheel assembly with respect to the sprung mass during a jounce event over a travel length of the wheel center of the wheel assembly with respect to the sprung mass, wherein the travel length extends between zero and L;

wherein the wheel center of the wheel assembly has a velocity U o relative to the sprung mass responsive to the jounce event at the travel length of zero, and wherein the wheel center of the wheel assembly has a velocity of zero responsive to the jounce event at the travel length of L; and

wherein F(L) is a combination of a damper force, Φ(y), provided by the damper and of the spring force, F(x), provided by the spring, where

F

(

x

)

=

F

(

(

1

-

y

2

U

0

2

)

L

)

,

for any wheel center velocity, y, where 0≦y≦U 0 , and where the damping rate of the damper provides

Φ

(

y

)

=

F

(

L

)

-

F

(

(

1

-

y

2

U

0

2

)

L

)

,

where L is given by

m

*

U

0

2

2

=

L

*

F

(

L

)

and wherein the wheel center velocity, y, responsive to the jounce event is related to a velocity, v, of the damper by a predetermined ratio, r, where y=v/r.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the damper force is a smooth, continuous and monotonically increasing progressive optimal unconstrained damper force.

3. A method for providing a suspension system with optimized damper response, wherein a sprung mass is suspended by the suspension system, the suspension system including a wheel assembly having a wheel center and a mass, m, a nonlinear damper wherein the damper is connected between the sprung mass and the wheel assembly, and a spring having a predetermined spring force, F(x), as a function of displacement of the wheel relative to the sprung mass wherein the spring is connected between the sprung mass and the wheel assembly, said method comprising the steps of:

providing, if an initial velocity, U 0 , of the wheel center of the wheel assembly relative to the sprung mass in response to a jounce event at an initial position, x 0 , is less than or equal to a first predetermined wheel center velocity, u 1 :

a predetermined force, φ(y), by the damper and the spring acting in combination on the wheel assembly with respect to the sprung mass; and

providing, if the initial velocity, U 0 , of the wheel center of the wheel assembly relative to the sprung mass in response to a jounce event at the initial position, x 0 , is greater than the first predetermined wheel center velocity, u 1 :

a substantially constant total force, C 1 , by the damper and the spring acting in combination on the wheel assembly with respect to the sprung mass during a jounce event for any velocity of the wheel center of the wheel assembly greater than or equal to a second predetermined wheel center velocity, u 2 , where u 2 >u 1 ;

the predetermined force, φ(y), by the damper and the spring acting in combination on the wheel assembly with respect to the sprung mass for any velocity of the wheel center of the wheel assembly relative to the sprung mass in response to a jounce event in which the velocity of the wheel center in response thererto is less than or equal to the first predetermined wheel center velocity, u 1 ; and

a smooth, continuous and monotonically increasing transition force by the damper and the spring acting in combination on the wheel assembly with respect to the sprung mass for any wheel center velocity in response to the jounce event between velocity u 1 and velocity u 2 ; and

wherein said parameters are related by:

Ω

(

y

)

=

{

Φ

1

(

y

)

C

1

-

F

(

U

0

2

-

y

2

2

C

1

m

+

x

0

)

,

y

u

2

step

(

y

,

u

1

,

φ

(

y

)

,

u

2

,

Φ

1

(

y

)

)

,

u

2

y

u

1

φ

(

y

)

,

u

1

y

0

where step is the transition force acting from φ(y) at velocity u 1 to Φ 1 (y) at velocity u 2 ; and

wherein for a predetermined ratio, r, such that said y=v/r, where v is a velocity of the damper relative to the sprung mass, then a progressive optimal constrained damping function Ψ(v) as a function of the damper velocity v is given by the relation

Ψ

(

v

)

=

Ω

(

y

=

v

/

r

)

r

.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein:

u 1 generally neighbors u 2 ; and

u 1 is substantially equal to 2.0 m/s.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034185/0587 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0035 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0057 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0780 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0187 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0215 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0880 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0670 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022554/0479 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 3, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022201/0363 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2007
From: KNOLL, RICHARD J.; GOLPE, WILLIAM; MOSHCHUK, NIKOLAI K.; NAMUDURI, CHANDRA S.; NARDI, FLAVIO; RYU, JIHAN; NAYAK, RAVIRAJ U.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 020109/0016 →