IP Library Patent Application 12303983
Patent Application
App. No. 12/303,983

METHOD FOR OUTSOURCING TECHNOLOGY SERVICES

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
12/303,983
Abstract

A method of outsourcing technology. Metrics are determined to govern services by agreement between a client and an outsourcer. Services required by the client are selected from a fixed list of services and a quality for the selected service is determined, the selection and the quality being dependent on the metrics. The services within the fixed list of services are organised within groups and at least one service corresponds to a predetermined practice. An agreement is generated for the provision of each selected service, and the provision of each selected service is allocated to an appropriate technology service provider. Each technology service provider provides its allocated service according to the quality required and according to the corresponding practice. The services provided in conjunction are monitored and the quality of the services is adjusted or additional services are added from the list in response to the outcome of the monitoring.

Claims (33)

1 . A computer-implemented method of outsourcing technology services, comprising the steps of:

a. determining metrics to govern services by agreement between a client and an outsourcer;

b. selecting services required by the client from a fixed list of services and determining a quality for the selected service, wherein the selection and the quality of the selected services are dependent on the metrics, and wherein the services within the fixed list of services are organised within groups and at least one service corresponds to a predetermined practice;

c. generating an agreement between the outsourcer and the client for the provision of each selected service;

d. allocating the provision of each selected service to an appropriate technology service provider;

e. each technology service provider providing its allocated service according to the quality required and according to the corresponding predetermined practice;

f. monitoring the services provided in conjunction with the client; and,

g. adjusting the quality of the services or adding additional services from the list in response to the outcome of the monitoring.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the services are information technology services.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the metrics relate to any one or more from the set of the frequency of delivery; the quality of the service; the availability of components of the environment; and the ability of the environment to support the business.

4 . The method of claim 1 , including the step of determining a responsible party for delivery of the service from one of the outsourcer, the client, or a third party.

5 . The method of claim 1 , including the step of defining a plurality of environments for the client.

6 . The method of claim 5 , including the step of determining a responsible party for delivery of the service for each of the environments of the client, the responsible party being selected from one of the outsourcer, the client, or a third party.

7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the environments are defined by one of infrastructure, data or business environments.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the groups of services are organised based on functional grounds.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the services include administration services, support services, maintenance services, and infrastructure services.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the fixed list of services include administration services, support services, maintenance services, and infrastructure services.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the services are grouped into groups of one or more services from the set of account management, third party management, warranty management, asset management, procurement, license administration, end user training, service desk, pipeline management, hardware support, deskside support, installations/moves/adds and changes, software support, software distribution, storage management, performance management, resource management, housing facilities, operational service, disaster recovery, scheduling services, output services, security management, internet services, application support capacity planning, architecture, consulting services & supplementary services, data management, network management, and system management.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the services are ordered by grouping from administration services, support services, maintenance services, to infrastructure services.

13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the fixed list of services is ordered by group, each group including services selected from account management, third party management, warranty management, asset management, procurement, license administration, end user training, service desk, pipeline management, hardware support, deskside support, installations/moves/adds and changes, software support, software distribution, storage management, performance management, resource management, housing facilities, operational service, disaster recovery, scheduling services, output services, security management, internet services, application support capacity planning, architecture, consulting services & supplementary services, data management, network management, to system management.

14 . A computer-implemented method of determining pricing for one or more technology outsourcing services, comprising the steps of:

a. one or more operational delivery groups delivering technology outsourcing services using a list of services for one or more clients, wherein each service includes a level of quality for the service and each service corresponds to a process for performing the service and wherein each process defines working practices;

b. generating costs for each service delivered;

c. compositing the costs into a cost model for all services delivered; and

d. generating a pricing model from the cost model.

15 . A computer-readable medium having stored thereon a computer program comprising instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform the steps of:

a. determining metrics to govern services by agreement between a client and an outsourcer;

b. selecting services required by the client from a fixed list of services and determining a quality for the selected service, wherein the selection and the quality of the selected services are dependent on the metrics, and wherein the services within the fixed list of services are organised within groups and at least one service corresponds to a predetermined practice;

c. generating an agreement between the outsourcer and the client for the provision of each selected service;

d. allocating the provision of each selected service to an appropriate technology service provider;

e. each technology service provider providing its allocated service according to the quality required and according to the corresponding predetermined practice;

f. monitoring the services provided in conjunction with the client; and

g. adjusting the quality of the services or adding additional services from the list in response to the outcome of the monitoring.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2017
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (SUCCESSOR TO GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION)
To: UNISYS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 044416/0358 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 27, 2011
From: UNISYS CORPORATION
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 026509/0001 →
RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY Recorded Sep 14, 2009
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: UNISYS CORPORATION; UNISYS HOLDING CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 023263/0631 →
RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY Recorded Jul 31, 2009
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: UNISYS CORPORATION; UNISYS HOLDING CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 023312/0044 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Feb 10, 2009
From: UNISYS CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 022237/0172 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2008
From: LYMBERY, GREGG JOHN; PRATT, STEPHEN; COOK, PETER
To: UNISYS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 021942/0797 →