IP Library Granted Patent US 8,135,710
Granted Patent B2
US 8,135,710 · App. 12/315,610 · Granted Mar 13, 2012

Computer readable electronic records automated classification system

Assignee: EMC Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,135,710
App. No.
12/315,610
Granted
Mar 13, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

Classifying an electronic document in a computer-based system is disclosed. For each classification instance in a plurality of classification instances, a confidence data indicating a degree of confidence that the electronic document is associated with that classification instance is determined. A classification, based on a first classification instance in the plurality of classification instances, is assigned without human intervention to the electronic document if the confidence data associated with the first classification instance exceeds a first threshold.

Claims (28)

1. A method for classifying an electronic document in a computer-based system, comprising:

determining for each classification instance in a plurality of classification instances a confidence data indicating a degree of confidence that the electronic document is associated with that classification instance; and

assigning a classification to the electronic document, without human intervention and based on a first classification instance in the plurality of classification instances, if the confidence data associated with the first classification instance exceeds a first threshold;

further comprising determining, based on a human user input, which, if any, classification should be assigned to the electronic document if the classification cannot be assigned to the document without human intervention;

wherein the classification cannot be assigned to the document without human intervention if no classification instance in the plurality of classification instances is associated with the confidence data that exceeds the first threshold; and

wherein the human user input is obtained including by presenting to a human user a graphical representation of at least two classification instances in the plurality of classification instances if each of at least a prescribed number of classification instance(s) in the plurality of classification instances has the confidence data that exceeds a second threshold that is lower than the first threshold.

2. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising obtaining an indication of a user selection of at least one of the at least two classification instances.

3. The method recited in claim 1 , further comprising assigning a review classification to the electronic document to indicate that the electronic document is required to be reviewed by a human user if no classification instance in the plurality of classification instances is associated with the confidence data that exceeds the first threshold and fewer than a prescribed number of classification instance(s) in the plurality of classification instances has the confidence data that exceeds a second threshold.

4. The method recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the confidence data includes using information obtained by analyzing at least one training document associated with a pre-assigned classification.

5. A system for classifying an electronic document, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled with the processor, wherein the memory is configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to:

determine for each classification instance in a plurality of classification instances a confidence data indicating a degree of confidence that the electronic document is associated with that classification instance; and

assign a classification to the electronic document, without human intervention and based on a first classification instance in the plurality of classification instances, if the confidence data associated with the first classification instance exceeds a first threshold;

wherein the memory is further configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to determine, based on a human user input, which, if any, classification should be assigned to the electronic document if the classification cannot be assigned to the document without human intervention;

wherein the classification cannot be assigned to the document without human intervention if no classification instance in the plurality of classification instances is associated with the confidence data that exceeds the first threshold; and

wherein the human user input is obtained including by presenting to a human user a graphical representation of at least two classification instances in the plurality of classification instances if each of at least a prescribed number of classification instance(s) in the plurality of classification instances has the confidence data that exceeds a second threshold that is lower than the first threshold.

6. The system recited in claim 5 , wherein obtaining an indication of a user selection of at least one of the at least two classification instances.

7. The system recited in claim 5 , wherein the memory is further configured to provide the processor with instructions which when executed cause the processor to assign a review classification to the electronic document to indicate that the electronic document is required to be reviewed by a human user if no classification instance in the plurality of classification instances is associated with the confidence data that exceeds the first threshold and fewer than a prescribed number of classification instance(s) in the plurality of classification instances has the confidence data that exceeds a second threshold.

8. The system recited in claim 5 , wherein determining the confidence data includes using information obtained by analyzing at least one training document associated with a pre-assigned classification.

9. A computer program product for classifying an electronic document, the computer program product being embodied in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:

determining for each classification instance in a plurality of classification instances a confidence data indicating a degree of confidence that the electronic document is associated with that classification instance; and

assigning a classification to the electronic document, without human intervention and based on a first classification instance in the plurality of classification instances, if the confidence data associated with the first classification instance exceeds a first threshold;

further comprising computer instructions for determining, based on a human user input, which, if any, classification should be assigned to the electronic document if the classification cannot be assigned to the document without human intervention;

wherein the classification cannot be assigned to the document without human intervention if no classification instance in the plurality of classification instances is associated with the confidence data that exceeds the first threshold; and

wherein the human user input is obtained including by presenting to a human user a graphical representation of at least two classification instances in the plurality of classification instances if each of at least a prescribed number of classification instance(s) in the plurality of classification instances has the confidence data that exceeds a second threshold that is lower than the first threshold.

10. The computer program product recited in claim 9 , further comprising computer instructions for obtaining an indication of a user selection of at least one of the at least two classification instances.

11. The computer program product recited in claim 9 , wherein determining the confidence data includes using information obtained by analyzing at least one training document associated with a pre-assigned classification.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (045455/0001) Recorded May 20, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO MOZY, INC.); SCALEIO LLC; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.); DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC CORPORATION (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO MAGINATICS LLC)
Reel/Frame 061753/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2017
From: EMC CORPORATION
To: OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041579/0133 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2017
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: EMC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 041073/0443 →
PATENT RELEASE (REEL:40134/FRAME:0001) Recorded Jan 23, 2017
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: EMC CORPORATION, AS GRANTOR
Reel/Frame 041073/0136 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.; AVENTAIL LLC; CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL SYSTEMS CORPORATION; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; MAGINATICS LLC; MOZY, INC.; SCALEIO LLC; SPANNING CLOUD APPS LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040134/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 21, 2016
From: ASAP SOFTWARE EXPRESS, INC.; AVENTAIL LLC; CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DELL USA L.P.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL SOFTWARE INC.; DELL SYSTEMS CORPORATION; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; MAGINATICS LLC; MOZY, INC.; SCALEIO LLC; SPANNING CLOUD APPS LLC; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040136/0001 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 9, 2016
From: DOCUMENTUM RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC.; DOCUMENTUM CANADA COMPANY
To: DOCUMENTUM CANADA COMPANY
Reel/Frame 039981/0210 →
MERGER Recorded Sep 9, 2016
From: DOCUMENTUM CANADA COMPANY
To: EMC CORPORATION OF CANADA
Reel/Frame 039689/0740 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 9, 2016
From: EMC CORPORATION OF CANADA
To: EMC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 039689/0732 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 1, 2012
From: DOCUMENTUM, INC.
To: EMC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 027633/0744 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2012
From: SUMMERLIN, THOMAS A.; SHINKLE, TIMOTHY; STALTERS, RUSSELL E.
To: PROVENANCE SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 027633/0649 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 1, 2012
From: TRUEARC CORPORATION
To: DOCUMENTUM RECORDS MANAGEMENT INC.
Reel/Frame 027634/0138 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 1, 2012
From: PROVENANCE SYSTEMS INC.
To: TRUEARC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 027634/0132 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 10378025 · Feb 28, 2003
Continuation 09592778 · Jun 13, 2000
Related Publication 20090089305A1 · Apr 2, 2009