IP Library Granted Patent US 8,144,597
Granted Patent B2
US 8,144,597 · App. 12/347,002 · Granted Mar 27, 2012

Path selection for a wireless system with relays

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,144,597
App. No.
12/347,002
Granted
Mar 27, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method selects a path for forwarding a data packet in a wireless communication system. A system capacity versus delay impact curve is calculated for a direct path to mobile station. The direct path has a capacity cost based on communication quality of a direct link between a base station and the mobile station. This curve is shifted by a predetermined time corresponding to an additional delay over a relay path to produce a projected capacity curve for the relay path having a second capacity cost determined according to a combined measure of signal quality of multiple links in the relay path. The second capacity cost is multiplied by a capacity cost ratio to produce a relay capacity curve. The direct path or the relay path is selected based on a comparison of the system capacity versus delay impact curve and the relay capacity curve according to a QoS requirement.

Claims (36)

1. A method of selecting a path for forwarding a data packet in a wireless communication system, the wireless communication system including at least one base station, at least one relay station and at least one mobile station, the method comprising:

calculating a system capacity versus delay impact curve for a direct path to a mobile station, the direct path having a first capacity cost determined according to a communication quality of a direct link between a base station and the mobile station;

shifting the system capacity versus delay impact curve by a predetermined time to produce a projected capacity curve for a relay path, the predetermined time corresponding to an additional delay over the relay path, the relay path including the at least one relay station and having a second capacity cost determined according to a combined measure of signal quality of multiple links in the relay path;

multiplying the second capacity cost by a capacity cost ratio to produce a relay capacity curve; and

selecting one of the direct path and the relay path for forwarding the data packet, the path selection based on a comparison of the system capacity versus delay impact curve and the relay capacity curve at a point in the curves corresponding to a quality of service requirement of the data packet; and

forwarding the data packet along the selected path.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the path selection is further based on at least one of a required data rate, a type of service, user priority, mobility, system loading, fairness, and an effective data rate.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the path selection is further based on a modified combined index based on at least one of a required data rate, a type of service, user priority, mobility, system loading, fairness, and an effective data rate, the modified combined index created by biasing the path selection in consideration of additional capacity cost and delay impact.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the relay path is selected for the mobile station when a ratio of a resource usage gain for the mobile station and a capacity penalty is greater than 1.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the path selection is one of a dynamic path selection, a semi-static path selection and a static path selection.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the path selection is a dynamic path selection, the direct path and the relay path are dynamically selectable for forwarding the data packet corresponding to a same mobile station and having a same quality of service.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the one of the direct path and the relay path is selected based on a traffic pattern and a quality of service requirement.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein the path selection is a semi-static path selection, the direct path and the relay path are dynamically selectable for forwarding the data packet corresponding to a same mobile station and having multiple service flows with differing qualities of service.

9. The method of claim 5 , wherein the path selection is a static path selection, the one of the direct path and the relay path is selected based on an effective data rate of each path and a quality of service requirement.

10. An apparatus for selecting a path for forwarding a data packet in a wireless communication system, the wireless communication system including at least one base station, at least one relay station and at least one mobile station, the apparatus comprising:

a processor configured as a path selector to:

calculate a system capacity versus delay impact curve for a direct path to a mobile station, the direct path having a first capacity cost determined according to a communication quality of a direct link between a base station and the mobile station;

shift the system capacity versus delay impact curve a predetermined time to produce a projected capacity curve for a relay path, the predetermined time corresponding to an additional delay over the relay path, the relay path including the at least one relay station and having a second capacity cost determined according to a combined measure of signal quality of multiple links in the relay path;

multiply the second capacity cost by a capacity cost ratio to produce a relay capacity curve; and

select one of the direct path and the relay path for forwarding the data packet, the path selection based on a comparison of the system capacity versus delay impact curve and the relay capacity curve at a point in the curves corresponding to a quality of service requirement of the data packet.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the path selection is further based on at least one of a required data rate, a type of service, user priority, mobility, system loading, fairness, and an effective data rate.

12. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the path selection is further based on a modified combined index based on at least one of a required data rate, a type of service, user priority, mobility, fairness, and an effective data rate, the modified combined index created by biasing the path selection in consideration of additional capacity cost and delay impact.

13. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured as a path selector also selects the relay path for the mobile station when a ratio of a resource usage gain for the mobile station and a capacity penalty is greater than 1.

14. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the path selection is one of a dynamic path selection, a semi-static path selection and a static path selection.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the path selection is a dynamic path selection, the direct path and the relay path are dynamically selectable for forwarding the data packets corresponding to a same mobile station and having a same quality of service.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the one of the direct path and the relay path is selected based on a traffic pattern and a quality of service requirement.

17. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the path selection is a semi-static path selection, the direct path and the relay path are dynamically selectable for forwarding data packets corresponding to a same mobile station and having multiple service flows with differing qualities of service.

18. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the path selection is a static path selection, the one of the direct path and the relay path is selected based on an effective data rate of each path and a quality of service requirement.

19. A wireless communication system comprising:

at least one base station, the at least one base station including a path selector configured to:

calculate a system capacity versus delay impact curve for a first path to a mobile station, the first path having a first capacity cost determined according to a communication quality of a direct link between a base station and the mobile station;

shift the system capacity versus delay impact curve by a predetermined time to produce a projected capacity curve for a second path, the predetermined time corresponding to an additional delay over the second path, the second path having a second capacity cost determined according to a combined measure of signal quality of multiple links in the second path;

multiply the second capacity cost by a capacity cost ratio to produce a relay capacity curve; and

select one of the first path and the second path for forwarding the data packet, the path selection based on a comparison of the system capacity versus delay impact curve and the relay capacity curve at a point in the curves corresponding to a quality of service requirement of the data packet;

at least one relay station communicatively coupled to the at least one base station; and

at least one mobile station communicatively coupled to the at least one base station and the at least one relay station, the at least one mobile station configured to communicate with the at least one base station through at least two paths, a selected path of the at least two paths selected for forwarding a data packet based on a delay requirement of at least one of a service flow and the data packet.

Assignments (7)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 19, 2023
From: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
To: MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 064271/0199 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 16, 2023
From: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
To: MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 064104/0103 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 15, 2016
From: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED
To: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
Reel/Frame 038087/0963 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2012
From: ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP
To: 2256355 ONTARIO LIMITED
Reel/Frame 028018/0848 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2012
From: 2256355 ONTARIO LIMITED
To: RESEARCH IN MOTION LIMITED
Reel/Frame 028020/0474 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2011
From: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
To: ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP
Reel/Frame 027143/0717 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 18, 2009
From: SENARATH, NIMAL GAMINI; YU, DEREK; ZHANG, HANG; BAHCECI, ISRAFIL; ZHU, PEIYING; TONG, WEN
To: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 022272/0778 →