METHOD FOR TESTING AND REPAIRING ADHESIVE BONDS
A method for testing adhesive bond quality includes subjecting an adhesively-bonded workpiece to a known loading function. The loading function may be cyclic, linear, or nonlinear, and configured not to damage the workpiece. Response characteristics of the workpiece are measured during the loading. Measured response characteristics are compared with baseline or nominal characteristics and the adhesive bond quality is determined from the resulting comparison. A differential signal may be generated based upon the comparison of measured response and baseline characteristics and used to determine the adhesive bond quality, possibly with an algorithm. Being within the acceptable range is indicative of acceptable adhesive bond quality. The root cause of failure may be determined and a course of action based thereupon; including: localized curing, inspection, repair, and destruction. Following corrective courses of action, the workpiece may be re-tested and compared again to the baseline.
1 . A method of testing adhesive bond quality, comprising:
subjecting a workpiece to a known loading function, wherein said workpiece has had an adhesive and a curing process applied to create an adhesive bond;
measuring a response characteristic of said workpiece while subject to said known loading function;
comparing said response characteristic to a baseline characteristic; and
determining the adhesive bond quality from said response and baseline characteristics.
2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
generating a differential signal based upon said comparison of said response and baseline characteristics; and
determining the adhesive bond quality from said differential signal.
3 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising using an algorithm to process said differential signal to determine adhesive bond quality.
4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein said algorithm further includes:
determining if said differential signal is within an acceptable range, wherein said differential signal being within said acceptable range is indicative of said workpiece having acceptable adhesive bond quality;
determining a root cause of failure from said differential signal if said differential signal is not within said acceptable range;
determining a course of action based upon said determined root cause of failure.
5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein said course of action includes one of applying localized curing to the adhesive, inspecting said workpiece, repairing said workpiece, and destroying said workpiece.
6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein said applying localized curing includes heating said workpiece.
7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein said response characteristic and said baseline characteristic are one of hysteretic loss and load-displacement response.
8 . A method of testing adhesive bond quality, comprising:
subjecting a workpiece to a known loading function, wherein said workpiece has had an adhesive and a curing process applied to create an adhesive bond;
measuring a response characteristic of said workpiece while subject to said known loading function;
comparing said response characteristic to a baseline characteristic;
determining a root cause of failure from said comparing said response characteristic to said baseline characteristic; and
determining a course of action based upon said determined root cause of failure.
9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein said response characteristic and said baseline characteristic are one of hysteretic loss and load-displacement response.
10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein said course of action includes one of applying localized curing to the adhesive, inspecting said workpiece, repairing said workpiece, and destroying said workpiece.
11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein said applying localized curing includes heating said workpiece.
12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:
re-subjecting said workpiece to said known loading function after said applying localized curing;
measuring a second response characteristic of said workpiece while subject to said known loading function;
comparing said second response characteristic to said baseline characteristic;
determining a second root cause of failure from said comparing said second response characteristic to said baseline characteristic; and
determining a second course of action based upon said second determined root cause of failure.
13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein said known loading function is configured not to damage said workpiece.
14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein said known loading function is a linear cyclic function.
15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein said known loading function is a nonlinear cyclic function.