IP Library Patent Application 12449710
Patent Application
App. No. 12/449,710

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING DIAGNOSING AND PREDICTING THE OCCURRENCE OF A MEDICAL CONDITION

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
12/449,710
Filed
Aug 20, 2009
Art Unit
1631
USPC
703/11
Abstract

Methods and systems are provided that use clinical information, molecular information and computer-generated morphometric information in a predictive model for predicting the occurrence (e.g., recurrence) of a medical condition, for example, cancer. In an embodiment, a model that predicts prostate cancer recurrence is provided, where the model is based on features including one or more (e.g., all) of biopsy Gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, preoperative PSA, dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade, the relative area of AR+ epithelial nuclei, a morphometric measurement of epithelial nuclei, and a morphometric measurement of epithelial cytoplasm. In another embodiment, a model that predicts clinical failure post-prostatectomy is provided, wherein the model is based on features including one or more (e.g., all) of dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade, lymph node invasion status, one or more morphometric measurements of lumen, a morphometric measurement of cytoplasm, and average intensity of AR in AR+/AMACR− epithelial nuclei.

Claims (56)

1 . Apparatus for evaluating a risk of prostate cancer recurrence in a patient, the apparatus comprising:

a model predictive of prostate cancer recurrence configured to evaluate a dataset for a patient to thereby evaluate a risk of prostate cancer recurrence in the patient, wherein the model is based on one or more features selected from the following group of features:

biopsy Gleason score;

seminal vesicle invasion;

extracapsular extension;

preoperative PSA;

dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade;

the relative area of AR+ epithelial nuclei;

a morphometric measurement of epithelial nuclei derived from a tissue image; and

a morphometric measurement of epithelial cytoplasm derived from a tissue image.

2 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the morphometric measurement of epithelial nuclei comprises a measurement of texture of tumor epithelial nuclei.

3 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the morphometric measurement of epithelial cytoplasm comprises a measurement of texture of tumor epithelial cytoplasm.

4 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on two features from the group.

5 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on three features from the group.

6 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on four features from the group.

7 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on five features from the group.

8 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on six features from the group.

9 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on seven features from the group.

10 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on all eight features from the group.

11 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is configured to produce a value indicative of the risk of occurrence of the medical condition in the patient.

12 . The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the model is based on the feature of the relative area of AR+ epithelial nuclei, which feature is based on computer analysis of a tissue image showing immunofluorescence.

13 . A method of evaluating a risk of prostate cancer recurrence in a patient, the method comprising:

evaluating a dataset for a patient with a model predictive of prostate cancer recurrence, wherein the model is based on one or more features selected from the following group of features: biopsy Gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, preoperative PSA, dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade, the relative area of AR+ epithelial nuclei, a morphometric measurement of epithelial nuclei derived from a tissue image, and a morphometric measurement of epithelial cytoplasm derived from a tissue image,

thereby evaluating the risk of prostate cancer recurrence in the patient.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the morphometric measurement of epithelial nuclei comprises a measurement of texture of tumor epithelial nuclei.

15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the morphometric measurement of epithelial cytoplasm comprises a measurement of texture of tumor epithelial cytoplasm.

16 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising outputting a value indicative of the patient's risk of prostate cancer recurrence.

17 . The method of claim 13 , further comprising generating the feature of relative area of AR+ epithelial nuclei based on computer analysis of a tissue image showing immunofluorescence.

18 . A computer-readable medium comprising computer executable instructions recorded thereon for performing the method comprising:

evaluating a dataset for a patient with a model predictive of prostate cancer recurrence to thereby evaluate the risk of prostate cancer recurrence in the patient, wherein the model is based on one or more features selected from the following group of features: biopsy Gleason score, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, preoperative PSA, dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade, the relative area of AR+ epithelial nuclei, a morphometric measurement of epithelial nuclei derived from a tissue image, and a morphometric measurement of epithelial cytoplasm derived from a tissue image.

19 . Apparatus for evaluating a risk of clinical failure in a patient subsequent to the patient having a radical prostatectomy, the apparatus comprising:

a model predictive of clinical failure configured to evaluate a dataset for a patient to thereby evaluate a risk of clinical failure for the patient, wherein the model is based on one or more features selected from the following group of features:

dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade;

lymph node invasion status;

a morphometric measurement of lumen derived from a tissue image;

a morphometric measurement of cytoplasm derived from a tissue image; and

average intensity of AR in AR+/AMACR− epithelial nuclei.

20 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the morphometric measurement of lumen comprises average perimeter length of lumen.

21 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the morphometric measurement of lumen comprises relative area of lumen.

22 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the model is based on at least two morphometric measurements of lumen comprising average perimeter length of lumen and relative area of lumen.

23 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the model is based on the feature of average intensity of AR in AR+/AMACR− epithelial nuclei, which features is based on computer analysis of a tissue image showing immunofluorescence.

24 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the model is based on two features from the group.

25 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the model is based on three features from the group.

26 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the model is based on four features from the group.

27 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the model is based on five features from the group.

28 . The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the model is configured to produce a value indicative of the risk of clinical failure in the patient.

29 . A method of evaluating a risk of clinical failure in a patient subsequent to the patient having a radical prostatectomy, the method comprising:

evaluating a dataset for a patient with a model predictive of clinical failure post-prostatectomy, wherein the model is based on one or more features selected from the following group of features: dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade, lymph node invasion status, a morphometric measurement of lumen derived from a tissue image, a morphometric measurement of cytoplasm derived from a tissue image, and average intensity of AR in AR+/AMACR− epithelial nuclei,

thereby evaluating the risk of clinical failure in the patient.

30 . The method of claim 29 , wherein the morphometric measurement of lumen comprises average perimeter length of lumen.

31 . The method of claim 29 , wherein the morphometric measurement of lumen comprises relative area of lumen.

32 . The method of claim 29 , wherein the model is based on at least two morphometric measurements of lumen comprising average perimeter length of lumen and relative area of lumen.

33 . The method of claim 29 , further comprising outputting a value indicative of the patient's risk of clinical failure.

34 . The method of claim 29 , further comprising generating the feature of average intensity of AR in AR+/AMACR− epithelial nuclei based on computer analysis of a tissue image showing immunofluorescence.

35 . A computer-readable medium comprising computer executable instructions recorded thereon for performing the method comprising:

evaluating a dataset for a patient with a model predictive of clinical failure post-prostatectomy to thereby evaluate the risk of clinical failure in the patient, wherein the model is based on one or more features selected from the following group of features: dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade, lymph node invasion status, a morphometric measurement of lumen derived from a tissue image, a morphometric measurement of cytoplasm derived from a tissue image, and average intensity of AR in AR+/AMACR− epithelial nuclei.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2012
From: AUREON (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
To: AUREON, INC.
Reel/Frame 028241/0359 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2012
From: AUREON, INC.
To: CHAMPALIMAUD FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 028244/0077 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 25, 2010
From: AUREON BIOSCIENCES, INC.
To: ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI GMBH & CO. KG; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI, L.P.; ATLAS VENTURE ENTREPRENEURS' FUND VI, L.P.; PFIZER INC.; MINTZ LEVIN INVESTMENTS LLC; SPROUT CAPITAL IX, L.P.; DLJ CAPITAL CORP.; SPROUT ENTREPRENEURS FUND, L.P.; SPROUT IX PLAN INVESTORS, L.P.; CANTABRIA DE ACTIVOS, S.L.; CORPORACION MASAVEU, S.A.; INICIATIVAS DIGITALES; IPETEX S.A.; INVERSIONES VECU 2006, S.L.; LEALTAD DESARROLLO, S.C.R., S.A.; BASSETTI, MARCO; C+PA-CIMENTO E PRODUTOS ASSOCIADOS, S.A.
Reel/Frame 025178/0899 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 9, 2010
From: AUREON BIOSCIENCES, INC.
To: ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI, L.P.; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI GMBH & CO. KG; ATLAS VENTURE ENTREPRENEURS' FUND VI, L.P.; SPROUT ENTREPRENEURS FUND, L.P.; SPROUT CAPITAL IX, L.P.; DLJ CAPITAL CORP.; SPROUT IX PLAN INVESTORS, L.P.; PFIZER INC; MINTZ LEVIN INVESTMENTS LLC; INICIATIVAS DIGITALES; INVERSIONES VECU 2006, S.L.; LEALTAD DESARROLLO, S.C.R., S.A.; IPETEX S.A.; CANTABRIA DE ACTIVOS, S.L.; CORPORACION MASAVEU, S.A.; PEREZ DE ARMINAN, ALFREDO; FERNANDEZ DE VILLAVICENCIO, GABRIEL STAMOGLOU; FERNANDEZ DE VILLAVICENCIO, ALEJANDRO STAMOGLOU
Reel/Frame 024946/0493 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 12, 2010
From: AUREON LABORATORIES, INC.
To: ATLAS VENTURE ENTREPRENEURS' FUND VI, L.P.; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI GMBH & CO. KG; ATLAS VENTURE FUND VI, L.P.; SPROUT CAPITAL IX, L.P.; DLJ CAPITAL CORP.; SPROUT IX PLAN INVESTORS, L.P.; SPROUT ENTREPRENEURS' FUND, L.P.; PFIZER INC.; CANTABRIA DE ACTIVOS, S.L.; CORPORACION MASAVEU, S.A.; LEALTAD DESARROLLO, S.C.R., S.A.; INICIATIVAS DIGITALES; INVERSIONES VECU 2006, S.L.; MARCO BASSETTI; ESTRELA - SGPS, S.A.; MINTZ LEVIN INVESTMENTS LLC
Reel/Frame 023768/0486 →