IP Library Granted Patent US 8,113,187
Granted Patent B2
US 8,113,187 · App. 12/570,251 · Granted Feb 14, 2012

Delay compensation systems and methods

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,113,187
App. No.
12/570,251
Granted
Feb 14, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A steady-state (SS) delay module determines a SS delay period for SS operating conditions based on an air per cylinder. A dynamic compensation module determines a predicted delay period based on first and second dynamic compensation variables for dynamic operating conditions, the SS delay period, a previous predicted delay period. The first dynamic compensation variable corresponds to a period between a first time when fuel is provided for a cylinder of an engine and a second time when exhaust gas resulting from combustion of the fuel and air is expelled from the cylinder. The SS and predicted delay periods correspond to a period between the first time and a third time when the exhaust gas reaches an exhaust gas oxygen sensor located upstream of a catalyst. A final equivalence ratio module adjusts fuel provided to the cylinder after the third time based on the predicted delay period.

Claims (43)

1. A system for a vehicle, comprising:

a steady-state (SS) delay module that determines a SS delay period for SS operating conditions based on an air per cylinder (APC);

a dynamic compensation module that determines a predicted delay period based on first and second dynamic compensation variables for dynamic operating conditions, the SS delay period, a previous predicted delay period,

wherein the first dynamic compensation variable corresponds to a period between a first time when fuel is provided for a cylinder of an engine and a second time when exhaust gas resulting from combustion of a mixture of the fuel and air is expelled from the cylinder, and

wherein the SS and predicted delay periods correspond to a period between the first time and a third time when the exhaust gas reaches an exhaust gas oxygen (EGO) sensor that is located upstream of a catalyst; and

a final equivalence ratio (EQR) module that adjusts an amount of fuel provided to the cylinder after the third time based on the predicted delay period.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the dynamic compensation module determines the predicted delay period based on a sum of first and second delay periods, determines the first delay period based on a first product of the SS delay period and the second dynamic compensation variable, and determines the second delay period based on a second product of the previous predicted delay period and the second dynamic compensation variable.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein the previous predicted delay period corresponds to a last predicted delay period determined by the dynamic compensation module.

4. The system of claim 2 wherein the SS delay period corresponds to the SS delay period determined by the SS delay module a number of combustion events before the first time, wherein the number is the first dynamic compensation variable.

5. The system of claim 2 wherein the second dynamic compensation variable is one of a first value and a second value.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein the dynamic compensation module selectively sets the second dynamic compensation variable to one of a first value and a second value based on the APC, wherein the first and second values are unequal.

7. The system of claim 6 wherein the dynamic compensation module sets the second dynamic compensation variable to one of the first and second values when the APC is increasing and to the other one of the first and second values when the APC is decreasing.

8. The system of claim 1 further comprising:

a sensor delay module that determines an expected equivalence ratio (EQR) of the exhaust gas based on the predicted delay;

a sensor output module that selectively translates the expected EQR into units of an EGO measurement output by the EGO sensor; and

an error module that determines an error based on a difference between the expected EQR and the EGO measurement.

9. The system of claim 8 wherein the final EQR module adjusts the amount of fuel provided to the cylinder after the third time based on the error.

10. The system of claim 8 further comprising a retrieval module that retrieves one or more equivalence ratios (EQRs) of air/fuel mixtures provided to the cylinder before the first time and that determines a retrieval EQR based on the one or more equivalence ratios and the predicted delay,

wherein the sensor delay module determines the expected EQR based on the retrieved EQR.

11. A method for a vehicle, comprising:

determining a steady-state (SS) delay period for SS operating conditions based on an air per cylinder (APC);

determining a predicted delay period based on first and second dynamic compensation variables for dynamic operating conditions, the SS delay period, a previous predicted delay period,

wherein the first dynamic compensation variable corresponds to a period between a first time when fuel is provided for a cylinder of an engine and a second time when exhaust gas resulting from combustion of a mixture of the fuel and air is expelled from the cylinder, and

wherein the SS and predicted delay periods correspond to a period between the first time and a third time when the exhaust gas reaches an exhaust gas oxygen (EGO) sensor that is located upstream of a catalyst; and

adjusting an amount of fuel provided to the cylinder after the third time based on the predicted delay period.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

determining the predicted delay period based on a sum of first and second delay periods;

determining the first delay period based on a first product of the SS delay period and the second dynamic compensation variable; and

determining the second delay period based on a second product of the previous predicted delay period and the second dynamic compensation variable.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the previous predicted delay period corresponds to a last predicted delay period determined.

14. The method of claim 12 wherein the SS delay period corresponds to the SS delay period determined a number of combustion events before the first time, wherein the number is the first dynamic compensation variable.

15. The method of claim 12 wherein the second dynamic compensation variable is one of a first value and a second value.

16. The method of claim 11 further comprising selectively setting the second dynamic compensation variable to one of a first value and a second value based on the APC, wherein the first and second values are unequal.

17. The method of claim 16 further comprising setting the second dynamic compensation variable to one of the first and second values when the APC is increasing and to the other one of the first and second values when the APC is decreasing.

18. The method of claim 11 further comprising:

determining an expected equivalence ratio (EQR) of the exhaust gas based on the predicted delay;

selectively translating the expected EQR into units of an EGO measurement output by the EGO sensor; and

determining an error based on a difference between the expected EQR and the EGO measurement.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising adjusting the amount of fuel provided to the cylinder after the third time based on the error.

20. The method of claim 18 further comprising:

retrieving one or more equivalence ratios (EQRs) of air/fuel mixtures provided to the cylinder before the first time;

determining a retrieval EQR based on the one or more equivalence ratios and the predicted delay; and

determining the expected EQR based on the retrieved EQR.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034287/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0299 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0555 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0091 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025246/0234 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 25, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023989/0155 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 25, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023990/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE FOURTH ASSIGNORS NAME ON THE ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 002332 FRAME 0040. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NAME OF FOURTH ASSIGNOR AS STEPHEN YURKOVICH. Recorded Oct 16, 2009
From: MEYER, JASON; MIDLAM-MOHLER, SHAWN W.; DUDEK, KENNETH P.; YURKOVICH, STEPHEN; GUEZENNEC, YANN G.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023383/0187 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 6, 2009
From: MEYER, JASON; MIDLAM-MOHLER, SHAWN W.; DUDEK, KENNETH P.; YURKOVICH, STEPHEN P.; GUEZENNEC, YANN G.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023332/0040 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20110073087A1 · Mar 31, 2011