Method and system for verifying the operation of an SCR catalyst
View Patent ↗A method and control system for a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalytic converter and an ammonia dosing module that stores ammonia in a selective catalyst reducing (SCR) catalyst and that depletes the ammonia level by discontinuing or reducing dosing. The control system also includes an SCR conversion efficiency module that determines an SCR efficiency. An SCR efficiency comparison module compares the SCR efficiency to an efficiency threshold and generates a fault indicator when the SCR efficiency is not above the efficiency threshold.
1. A method comprising:
injecting ammonia, using a dosing injector, into an exhaust stream to store ammonia in a selective catalyst reducing (SCR) catalyst;
determining whether the stored ammonia is greater than an ammonia threshold;
reducing an ammonia dosing amount of the SCR catalyst if the stored ammonia is greater than an ammonia threshold;
waiting a delay period;
determining, after the delay period, an SCR efficiency if the ammonia dosing amount is reduced;
determining an efficiency threshold;
comparing, in response to the ammonia dosing amount being reduced, the SCR efficiency to the efficiency threshold; and
when the SCR efficiency is not above the efficiency threshold, generating a fault indicator in response to the comparing, wherein the efficiency threshold is based on an SCR performance model.
2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein reducing the ammonia dosing amount comprises changing operation of the dosing system.
3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein determining an SCR efficiency comprises determining the SCR efficiency based on an amount of upstream oxides of nitrogen.
4. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising prior to comparing the SCR efficiency to an efficiency threshold, determining the efficiency threshold based on an SCR temperature.
5. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein determining an efficiency threshold comprises prior to comparing the SCR efficiency to the efficiency threshold, determining the efficiency threshold based on an SCR temperature and an upstream amount of oxides of nitrogen.
6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein generating a fault indicator comprises when the SCR efficiency is not above the efficiency threshold after a predetermined amount of oxides of nitrogen, generating the fault indicator.
7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein comparing the SCR efficiency to an efficiency threshold comprises comparing the SCR efficiency to the efficiency threshold until a predetermined amount of oxides of nitrogen are generated after reducing the ammonia dosing amount.
8. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein generating a fault indicator comprises generating a fault flag.
9. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising when the SCR efficiency is above the efficiency threshold, generating a non-fault indicator.
10. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising when the SCR efficiency is above or below the efficiency threshold, enabling a dosing system.
11. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising when the SCR efficiency is above the efficiency threshold and after a predetermined amount of oxides of nitrogen are generated, generating a non-fault indicator.
12. A control system comprising:
a dosing injector configured to inject ammonia into an exhaust stream;
a first electronic circuit configured to:
control the dosing injector to store ammonia in a selective catalyst reducing (SCR) catalyst;
determine whether the stored ammonia is greater than an ammonia threshold; and
control reducing of an ammonia dosing amount if the first electronic circuit determines the stored ammonia is greater than the ammonia threshold;
a second electronic circuit configured to wait a delay period and determine, after the delay period, an SCR efficiency if the ammonia dosing amount is reduced; and
a third electronic circuit configured to:
determine an efficiency threshold;
perform a comparison, in response to the ammonia dosing amount being reduced, of the SCR efficiency to the efficiency threshold; and
generate a fault indicator in response to the comparison;
wherein the efficiency threshold is based on an SCR performance model.
13. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein the SCR efficiency is based on an upstream oxide of nitrogen amount.
14. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein prior to comparing the SCR efficiency to an efficiency threshold, determining an efficiency threshold, based on an SCR temperature and an SCR performance model.
15. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein the efficiency threshold is based on an SCR temperature.
16. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein the third electronic circuit generates the fault indicator when the SCR efficiency is not above the efficiency threshold after a predetermined amount of oxides of nitrogen.
17. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein the third electronic circuit compares the SCR efficiency to the efficiency threshold until a predetermined amount of oxides of nitrogen are generated after reducing the ammonia dosing amount.
18. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein the fault indicator comprises a fault flag.
19. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein the third electronic circuit is further configured to enable a dosing system when the SCR efficiency is above or below the efficiency threshold.
20. The control system as recited in claim 12 wherein the third electronic circuit is further configured to generate a non-fault indicator when the SCR efficiency is above the efficiency threshold until a predetermined amount of oxides of nitrogen are measured.