Method of supervising a node in a communication system
A method of supervising a node in a communication system, the communication system comprising a OAM system, a Femto node controlled by the OAM system, and a first communication path between the node and the OAM system, the method comprising the steps of: determining that the node is unable to receive commands sent by the OAM system via the first communication path; establishing a second communication path between the node and the supervising entity via a cellular network; and sending a trigger message to the node via the second communication path to initiate a communication path set up on the first communication path towards the OAM system.
1. A method of supervising a node in a communication system, the communication system comprising a supervising entity, a node under the supervision of the supervising entity, and a first communication path between the node and the supervising entity, the method comprising the steps of:
determining that the node is unable to receive communications sent by the supervising entity via the first communication path; and
triggering the node to send a message to the supervising entity to initiate a maintenance procedure,
wherein the method proceeds according to an escalation level scheme in which a default escalation level is maintained when the node is able to receive communications sent by the supervising entity via the first communication path, a higher escalation level is set if irregular behavior is determined, and an even higher escalation level is set if there is a determination of fraud or deliberate tampering with the node.
2. A method according to claim 1 comprising establishing a second communication path between the node and the supervising entity.
3. A method according to claim 2 in which a trigger message is sent on the second communication path.
4. A method according to claim 2 in which the second communication path is established between a radio access network of a mobile network and the node.
5. A method according to claim 2 in which the second communication path is established as a secure connection.
6. A method according to claim 1 in which the first communication path is a default communication path used in the supervising entity exercising control over the node.
7. A method according to claim 1 in which the node is present in a home network.
8. A method according to claim 7 in which the supervising entity is present in a network different to the home network.
9. A method according to claim 1 in which the triggering is achieved by sending a short message service (SMS) message.
10. A method according to claim 1 in which the triggering causes the node to send a response message to the supervising entity.
11. A method according to claim 10 in which the response message is sent via the first communication path.
12. A method according to claim 10 in which sending of the response message opens a port which is then useable by the supervising entity in subsequent communication.
13. A method according to claim 1 in which supervising entity comprises a management system of an operator network.
14. A communication system comprising a supervising entity, a node under the supervision of the supervising entity, and a first communication path between the node and the supervising entity, the supervising entity comprising:
a monitoring entity configured to determine whether the node is unable to receive communications sent by the supervising entity via the first communication path;
a triggering element configured to trigger the node to send a message to the supervising entity to initiate a maintenance procedure; and
a primary communication path element configured to establish communication between the supervising entity and the node via the first communication path,
wherein the communication system is configured to proceed according to an escalation level scheme in which a default escalation level is maintained when the node is able to receive communications sent by the supervising entity via the first communication path, a higher escalation level is set if irregular behavior is determined, and an even higher escalation level is set if there is a determination of fraud or deliberate tampering with the node.
15. A supervising entity configured to supervise a node in a communication system over a first communication path between the node and the supervising entity, the supervising entity comprising:
a monitoring element configured to determine whether the node is unable to receive communications sent by the supervising entity via the first communication path;
a triggering element configured to trigger the node to send a message to the supervising entity to initiate a maintenance procedure; and
a primary communication path element configured to establish communication between the supervising entity and the node via the first communication path,
wherein the supervising entity is configured proceed according to an escalation level scheme in which a default escalation level is maintained when the node is able to receive communications sent by the supervising entity via the first communication path, a higher escalation level is set if irregular behavior is determined, and an even higher escalation level is set if there is a determination of fraud or deliberate tampering with the node.
16. A node configured to be supervised by a supervising entity in a communication system over a first communication path between the node and the supervising entity, the node comprising:
a primary communication path element configured to receive communications from the supervising entity via the first communication path; and
the node being capable, being triggered by the supervising entity, of sending a message to the supervising entity to initiate a maintenance procedure,
wherein the node is configured to proceed according to an escalation level scheme in which a default escalation level is maintained when the node is able to receive communications sent by the supervising entity via the first communication path, a higher escalation level is set if irregular behavior is determined, and an even higher escalation level is set if there is a determination of fraud or deliberate tampering with the node.