IP Library Patent Application 13947267
Patent Application
App. No. 13/947,267

Generating an Optimized Pricing Plan

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
13/947,267
Abstract

Generating an optimized pricing plan includes accessing a hierarchy comprising a sequence of levels, where each level includes an objective function and a set of constraints associated with the objective function. A mathematical programming model representing a pricing plan problem is determined for an item group comprising items. The following is repeated for each level of the sequence of levels: selecting a level comprising an objective function and a set of constraints associated with the objective function, determining an optimized boundary for the objective function, and adding a constraint generated from the optimized boundary to the set of constraints of a next level. An objective function of a last level of the sequence is optimized subject to the set of constraints associated with the objective function to yield an optimized result. An optimized pricing plan is generated in accordance with the optimized result.

Claims (94)

1 . A computer-implemented method of generating an optimized pricing plan, comprising:

accessing, by a computer, a hierarchy comprising a sequence of levels, each level comprising an objective function and a set of objective function constraints, wherein each objective function represents a primary objective or one or more secondary objectives;

assigning, by the computer, a first fixed price to a first item and a second fixed price to a second item according to one of the set of objective function constraints;

preventing, by the computer, a rule violation resulting from the first and second fixed prices by de-linking the first and second items within a plurality of items;

determining, by the computer, a mathematical programming model representing a pricing plan problem for an item group comprising the plurality of items, the mathematical programming model comprising a set of initial constraints;

repeating, by the computer, for each level of the sequence of levels, until a last level is reached:

adding the set of objective function constraints to the set of initial constraints;

optimizing the mathematical programming model to yield an optimized boundary for the objective function;

generating an optimized constraint from the optimized boundary; and

adding the optimized constraint to the set of objective function constraints of the next level of the sequence of levels;

optimizing, by the computer, an objective function of the last level of the sequence of levels subject to the set of objective function constraints to yield an optimized result, the set of objective function constraints comprising the optimized constraint generated from the optimized boundary of a previous level;

generating, by the computer, an optimized pricing plan in accordance with the optimized result, the optimized pricing plan associating an optimized price with each item of the item group;

determining by the computer, a number of price changes for ones of the plurality of items in accordance with the optimized pricing plan;

determining, by the computer, when the number of price changes for the ones of the plurality of items exceeds a predetermined number of price changes;

assigning a priority to the prices of the ones of the plurality of items that (1) have larger price changes, (2) are image items used to track competitors, or (3) have more stable prices; and

changing the prices of the ones of plurality of items that have the highest priority.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the mathematical programming model comprises a non-linear programming model; and

optimizing the objective function of the last level comprises optimizing the objective function using a non-linear programming technique.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

splitting a category of items into a plurality of item groups, each item group comprising a set of items related by one or more item constraints; and

selecting one of the plurality of item groups for which to generate the optimized pricing plan.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimized pricing plan lists the optimized price for each item of the item group for each time interval of the time period.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the optimized pricing plan lists the optimized price for each item of the item group for each location.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein optimizing the mathematical programming model to yield an optimized boundary for the objective function comprises:

expressing the objective function using one or more slack variables; and

optimizing the one or more slack variables to determine the optimized boundary.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

accessing a rounding rule for rounding the optimized price of an item for each item of the item group;

accessing a plurality of propagation rules, each propagation rule for determining the optimized price of a first item according to the optimized price of a second item, each propagation rule associated with an item of the item group; and

repeating the following for each item of the item group:

applying the rounding rule to the item of the item group; and

applying the propagation rule for determining the optimized price of the item according to a price of another item, if the item is associated with a propagation rule.

8 . A system of generating an optimized pricing plan, comprising:

a database stored therein a hierarchy comprising a sequence of levels, each level comprising an objective function, and a set of objective function constraints, wherein each objective function represents a primary objective or one or more secondary objectives; and

a computer system coupled with the database, the computer system configured to:

assign a first fixed price to a first item and a second fixed price to a second item, according to one of the set of objective function constraints;

prevent a rule violation resulting from the first and second fixed prices by de-linking the first and second items within a plurality of items;

determine a mathematical programming model representing a pricing plan problem for an item group comprising the plurality of items, the mathematical programming model comprising a set of initial constraints;

repeat for each level of the sequence of levels, until a last level is reached:

adding the set of objective function constraints to the set of initial constraints;

optimizing the mathematical programming model to yield an optimized boundary for the objective function;

generating an optimized constraint from the optimized boundary; and

adding the optimized constraint to the set of objective function constraints of the next level of the sequence of levels;

optimize an objective function of the last level of the sequence of levels subject to the set of objective function constraints to yield an optimized result, the set of objective function constraints comprising the optimized constraint generated from the optimized boundary of a previous level;

generate an optimized pricing plan in accordance with the optimized result, the optimized pricing plan associating an optimized price with each item of the item group;

determine a number of price changes for ones of the plurality of items in accordance with the optimized pricing plan;

determine when the number of price changes for the ones of the plurality of items exceeds a predetermined number of price changes;

assign a priority to the prices of the ones of the plurality of items that (1) have larger price changes, (2) are image items used to track competitors, or (3) have more stable prices; and

change the prices of the ones of plurality of items that have the highest priority.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the mathematical programming model comprises a non-linear programming model; and

the computer system is further configured to optimize the objective function of the last level by optimizing the objective function using a non-linear programming technique.

10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the computer system is further configured to:

split a category of items into a plurality of item groups, each item group comprising a set of items related by one or more item constraints; and

select one of the plurality of item groups for which to generate the optimized pricing plan.

11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the optimized pricing plan lists the optimized price for each item of the item group for each time interval of the time period.

12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the optimized pricing plan listing lists the optimized price for each item of the item group for each location.

13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the computer system is further configured to optimize the mathematical programming model to yield an optimized boundary for the objective function by:

expressing the objective function using one or more slack variables; and

optimizing the one or more slack variables to determine the optimized boundary.

14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the computer system is further configured to:

access a rounding rule for rounding the optimized price of an item for each item of the item group;

access a plurality of propagation rules, each propagation rule for determining the optimized price of a first item according to the optimized price of a second item, each propagation rule associated with an item of the item group; and

repeat the following for each item of the item group:

applying the rounding rule to the item of the item group; and

applying the propagation rule for determining the optimized price of the item according to a price of another item, if the item is associated with a propagation rule.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium embodied with software for generating an optimized pricing plan, the software when executed using a computer is configured to:

access a hierarchy comprising a sequence of levels, each level comprising an objective function and a set of objective function constraints, wherein each objective function represents a primary objective or one or more secondary objectives;

assign a first fixed price to a first item and a second fixed price to a second item, according to one of the set of objective function constraints;

prevent a rule violation resulting from the first and second fixed prices by de-linking the first and second items within a plurality of items;

determine a mathematical programming model representing a pricing plan problem for an item group comprising the plurality of items, the mathematical programming model comprising a set of initial constraints;

repeat for each level of the sequence of levels, until a last level is reached:

adding the set of objective function constraints to the set of initial constraints;

optimizing the mathematical programming model to yield an optimized boundary for the objective function;

generating an optimized constraint from the optimized boundary; and

adding optimized constraint generated from the optimized boundary to the set of objective function constraints of the next level of the sequence of levels;

optimize an objective function of the last level of the sequence of levels subject to the set of objective function constraints to yield an optimized result, the set of objective function constraints comprising the optimized constraint generated from the optimized boundary of a previous level;

generate an optimized pricing plan in accordance with the optimized result, the optimized pricing plan associating an optimized price with each item of the item group;

determine a number of price changes for ones of the plurality of items in accordance with the optimized pricing plan;

determine when the number of price changes for the ones of the plurality of items exceeds a predetermined number of price changes;

assign a priority to the prices of the ones of the plurality of items that (1) have larger price changes, (2) are image items used to track competitors, or (3) have more stable prices; and

change the prices of the ones of plurality of items that have the highest priority.

16 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein:

the mathematical programming model comprises a non-linear programming model; and

the software is further configured to optimize the objective function of the last level by optimizing the objective function using a non-linear programming technique.

17 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the software is further configured to:

split a category of items into a plurality of item groups, each item group comprising a set of items related by one or more item constraints; and

select one of the plurality of item groups for which to generate the optimized pricing plan.

18 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the optimized pricing plan lists the optimized price for each item of the item group for each time interval of the time period.

19 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the optimized pricing plan lists the optimized price for each item of the item group for each location.

20 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the software is further configured to optimize the mathematical programming model to yield an optimized boundary for the objective function by:

expressing the objective function using one or more slack variables; and

optimizing the one or more slack variables to determine the optimized boundary.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053383/0117) Recorded Nov 3, 2021
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 058794/0776 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 16, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.; BLUE YONDER, INC.; JDA SOFTWARE SERVICES, INC.; I2 TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, LLC; MANUGISTICS SERVICES, INC.; MANUGISTICS HOLDINGS DELAWARE II, INC.; REDPRAIRIE COLLABORATIVE FLOWCASTING GROUP, LLC; JDA SOFTWARE RUSSIA HOLDINGS, INC.; REDPRAIRIE SERVICES CORPORATION; BY BOND FINANCE, INC.; BY NETHERLANDS HOLDING, INC.; BY BENELUX HOLDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 057724/0593 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 3, 2020
From: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 053383/0117 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 13, 2020
From: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: BLUE YONDER GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 052385/0446 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 12, 2016
From: RP CROWN PARENT, LLC; RP CROWN HOLDING LLC; JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 040326/0449 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 22, 2013
From: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 030851/0544 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2013
From: JDA TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
To: JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 030848/0666 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2013
From: WALSER, JOACHIM PAUL; OREN, LAMOTT G.
To: I2 TECHNOLOGIES US, INC.
Reel/Frame 030846/0863 →