IP Library Granted Patent US 9,304,850
Granted Patent B1
US 9,304,850 · App. 14/468,231 · Granted Apr 5, 2016

Methods and apparatus for remediation workflow

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,304,850
App. No.
14/468,231
Granted
Apr 5, 2016
Kind
B1
Abstract

Disclosed herein are methods, systems, and articles associated with remediation workflow. A method may include determining one or more test failures related to a policy test within a computer network, and reviewing the one or more test failures. The method may further include, based upon a result of the reviewing, creating a remediation work order that includes at least one of the one or more test failures. Each test failure within the remediation work order may be approved or denied. For each test failure that is approved for remediation, a remediation process may be executed.

Claims (40)

1. A method comprising:

analyzing or facilitating analyzing, by a computing device, one or more test failures related to one or more policy tests within a computer network;

based upon a result of the analyzing of the one or more test failures, creating or facilitating creating, by the computing device, a remediation work order that specifies at least one of the one or more test failures;

reviewing or facilitating reviewing, by the computing device, each test failure specified within the remediation work order to approve or deny remediation for the test failure; and

executing or facilitating execution, by the computing device, for each test failure that is approved for remediation, a remediation process that corresponds to the particular test failure that is approved for remediation,

wherein the reviewing or facilitating reviewing comprises denying remediation for at least one of the test failures specified within the remediation work order and associated with a target host because the remediation would disable one or more security applications or needed business applications on the target host.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the remediation process comprises one or more remediation scripts.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

excluding or facilitating excluding, by the computing device, a test failure from the remediation work order.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

upon completion of all remediation processes within a work order, transitioning or facilitating transitioning, by the computing device, the remediation work order to a complete state.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

based upon transitioning the remediation work order to a complete state, closing or facilitating closing, by the computing device, the remediation work order.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

upon approving or denying each test failure within the remediation work order, deferring or facilitating deferring, by the computing device, to be remediated later, at least one test failure that is approved for remediation,

wherein upon completion of all remediation processes within a work order, transitioning or facilitating transitioning, by the computing device, the remediation work order to a complete state.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reviewing or facilitating reviewing comprises assigning one of the following available states to a respective test failure specified within the remediation work order: (a) denied for remediation, (b) approved for remediation but deferred, or (c) approved for remediation.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reviewing or facilitating reviewing comprises assigning at least one of the test failures specified within the remediation work order and associated with a target host to a state of being approved for remediation but deferred, thereby facilitating accrual of multiple remediations for the target host and allowing the remediations for the target host to be performed together.

9. An article of manufacture comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium; and

a plurality of programming instructions stored on the computer readable storage medium and configured to enable one or more computing devices, in response to execution of the programming instruction, to perform operations including:

obtaining or facilitating obtaining, one or more test failures related to one or more policy tests within a computer network;

creating or facilitating creating, a remediation work order that includes at least one of the one or more test failures;

approving or facilitating approving, at least one of the one or more test failure failures of the remediation order, for remediation; and

executing or facilitating executing, for each test failure that is approved for remediation, a remediation process that corresponds to a particular test failure that is approved for remediation,

wherein the reviewing or facilitating reviewing comprises denying remediation for at least one of the test failures specified within the remediation work order and associated with a target host because the remediation would disable one or more security applications or needed business applications on the target host.

10. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the remediation process comprises one or more remediation scripts.

11. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise: excluding or facilitating excluding a test failure from the remediation work order.

12. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise:

upon completion of all the remediation processes within a work order, transitioning or facilitating transitioning the remediation work order to a complete state.

13. The article of manufacture of claim 12 , wherein the operations further comprise: based upon transitioning the remediation work order to a complete state, closing or facilitating closing the remediation work order.

14. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the reviewing or facilitating reviewing comprises assigning one of the following available states to a respective test failure specified within the remediation work order: (a) denied for remediation, (b) approved for remediation but deferred, and (c) approved for remediation.

15. The article of manufacture of claim 9 , wherein the reviewing or facilitating reviewing comprises assigning at least one of the test failures specified within the remediation work order and associated with a target host to a state of being approved for remediation but deferred, thereby facilitating accrual of multiple remediations for the target host and allowing the remediations for the target host to be performed together.

16. An article of manufacture, comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium; and

a plurality of programming instructions stored on the computer-readable storage medium and configured to enable one or more computing devices, in response to execution of the programming instructions, to perform operations comprising:

in response to one or more policy test failures, generating a remediation work order specifying the one or more policy test failures;

for each of the one or more policy test failures specified within the remediation work order, approving or denying remediation of the test failure based on an application type for an application associated with the test failure; and

executing a remediation process for each of the one or more policy test failures that is approved for remediation,

wherein the approving or denying comprises denying remediation of a respective test failure because it is associated with an application being upgraded.

Assignments (11)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2026
From: ALERT LOGIC, INC.; DIGITAL GUARDIAN LLC; ECRIME MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC.; FORTRA, LLC; GLOBALSCAPE, INC.; TRIPWIRE, INC.
To: ACQUIOM AGENCY SERVICES LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 074233/0632 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 60306/0365 Recorded Nov 24, 2025
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 074023/0235 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 60306/0555 Recorded Nov 24, 2025
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 074023/0320 →
NEW MONEY FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 21, 2025
From: ALERT LOGIC, INC.; DIGITAL GUARDIAN LLC; ECRIME MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, INC.; FORTRA, LLC; GLOBALSCAPE, INC.; TRIPWIRE, INC.; VERA SECURITY, INC.
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073683/0534 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTEREST RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 60306/0649 Recorded Nov 21, 2025
From: ACQUIOM AGENCY SERVICES LLC
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 073663/0698 →
EXTENDED RCF FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 21, 2025
From: TRIPWIRE, INC.
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073663/0639 →
EXTENDED FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 21, 2025
From: TRIPWIRE, INC.
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073664/0124 →
ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 14, 2025
From: GOLUB CAPITAL MARKETS LLC (AS EXISTING AGENT)
To: ACQUIOM AGENCY SERVICES LLC (AS SUCCESSOR COLLATERAL AGENT)
Reel/Frame 072471/0665 →
SECOND LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 7, 2022
From: TRIPWIRE, INC.
To: GOLUB CAPITAL MARKETS LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 060306/0649 →
FIRST LIEN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 7, 2022
From: TRIPWIRE, INC.
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 060306/0365 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 12, 2014
From: WHITLOCK, DAVID; GASCOIGNE-PIGGFORD, GUY; GRANUM, GEOFF; PETRIE, MARK
To: TRIPWIRE, INC.
Reel/Frame 033728/0513 →