IP Library Granted Patent US 9,307,078
Granted Patent B2
US 9,307,078 · App. 14/618,460 · Granted Apr 5, 2016

Index of suspicion determination for communications request

Inventors: Robert Ehrlich (Windham, NH); Donald L. Mitchell (Bellevue, WA); Roger S. Marshall (Auburn, WA); Gordon John Hines (Kirkland, WA)
Assignee: TeleCommunication Systems, Inc.
H04M3/436H04M3/42042H04M3/42348H04M3/51H04M3/5116H04M2203/556H04M2203/6027
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,307,078
App. No.
14/618,460
Granted
Apr 5, 2016
Kind
B2
Abstract

The risk that an incoming emergency call is a prank call is presented in real-time to the called party, in the form of, e.g., an index of suspicion. An index of suspicion aggregation server quantifies, qualifies, and aggregates risks, suspicions, and/or threats relevant to a call center to formulate a scale of suspicion. Metrics are acquired (e.g., calling device location information, device configuration information, caller information, etc.) relevant to each communications request made to a call center and uses acquired metrics to rate communications requests based on a known scale of suspicion. Once a suspicion rating is determined for a communications request, the communications request is routed to a relevant call-taker terminal, as is the index of suspicion for that incoming call. Real time presentation of the index of suspicion enables call-takers to make better call-handling decisions based on risk analysis and historical call data associated with a given caller.

Claims (46)

1. A method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call, comprising:

requesting a current location of a wireless calling device to an incoming call, from a network positioning server;

comparing said obtained current location of said wireless calling device to locations of known active emergency events;

determining a suspicion rating that said incoming call relates to a known emergency event based on said comparison of said current location of said wireless calling device to locations of known active emergency events; and

providing said suspicion rating to a called device during said incoming call.

2. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 1 , wherein:

said suspicion rating is provided to said called device in real time during said incoming call.

3. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 1 , further comprising:

accessing a call history database to determine a level of confidence in said suspicion rating from a call history relating to said wireless calling device.

4. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 1 , further comprising:

accessing a call forensic database to determine a level of confidence in said suspicion rating by comparison to a pattern of known prank calls.

5. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 4 , wherein:

said pattern of known prank calls relates to known locations of confirmed prank calls.

6. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 4 , wherein:

said pattern of known prank calls relates to peak times of confirmed prank calls.

7. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 4 , wherein:

said pattern of known prank calls relates to prior confirmed prank calls linked to a caller identity of said wireless calling device.

8. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 4 , further comprising:

accessing a call forensic database to determine a level of confidence in said suspicion rating by comparison to a pattern of known prank calls.

9. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 8 , wherein:

said pattern of known prank calls relates to known locations of confirmed prank calls.

10. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 9 , wherein:

said pattern of known prank calls relates to peak times for confirmed prank calls.

11. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 8 , wherein:

said pattern of known prank calls relates to a caller identity linked to said wireless calling device.

12. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 4 , further comprising:

updating said call forensic database to include an entry of a confirmed prank call from a location of said wireless calling device.

13. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 3 , further comprising:

updating said call history database to include an entry of a confirmed prank call from said wireless calling device.

14. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 3 , further comprising:

updating said call history database to include an entry of a confirmed prank call from a caller identity linked to said wireless calling device.

15. The method of providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 1 , wherein:

said index of suspicion rating is provided to said called device upon request of said called device.

16. Apparatus for providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call, comprising:

means for requesting a current location of a wireless calling device to an incoming call, from a network positioning server;

means for comparing said obtained current location of said wireless calling device to locations of known active emergency events;

means for determining a suspicion rating that said incoming call relates to a known emergency event based on said comparison of said current location of said wireless calling device to locations of known active emergency events; and

means for transmitting said suspicion rating to a called device during said incoming call.

17. The apparatus for providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 16 , wherein:

said means for transmitting said suspicion rating transmits said suspicion rating in real time during said incoming call.

18. The apparatus for providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 16 , further comprising:

means for accessing a call history database to determine a level of confidence in said suspicion rating from a call history relating to said wireless calling device.

19. The apparatus for providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 16 , further comprising:

means for accessing a call forensic database to determine a level of confidence in said suspicion rating by comparison to a pattern of known prank calls.

20. The apparatus for providing a rating of suspicion indicating that an incoming call may be a prank call according to claim 16 , wherein:

said pattern of known prank calls relates to known locations of confirmed prank calls.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2018
From: COMTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP.; COMTECH EF DATA CORP.; COMTECH XICOM TECHNOLOGY, INC.; COMTECH SYSTEMS, INC.; COMTECH PST CORP.; COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORPORATION; ANGELS ACQUISITION CORP.; ARMER COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.; COMTECH AEROASTRO, INC.; COMTECH ANTENNA SYSTEMS, INC.; COMTECH COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; COMTECH COMSTREAM, INC.; COMTECH SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.; COMTECH TOLT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; TIERNAN RADYNE COMSTREAM, INC.; COMTECH CPI ELECTRON DEVICES CORP.; COMTECH CPI MICROWAVE CORP.; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.; NETWORKS IN MOTION, INC.; SOLVERN INNOVATIONS, INC.; MICRODATA, LLC; MICRODATA GIS, INC.; MAPLE ACQUISITION LLC; NEXTGEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A CORPORATION OF MARYLAND; NEXTGEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC., A CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA; OLIVE ACQUISITION LLC
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 048104/0080 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2015
From: EHRLICH, ROBERT; MITCHELL, DONALD L.; MARSHALL, ROGER S.; HINES, GORDON JOHN
To: TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 034930/0235 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 14220543 · Mar 20, 2014
Provisional Application 61803662 · Mar 20, 2013
Related Publication 20150156319A1 · Jun 4, 2015