IP Library Granted Patent US 9,832,525
Granted Patent B2
US 9,832,525 · App. 14/881,344 · Granted Nov 28, 2017

Set-top disk health diagnostics

Inventors: Krishna Prasad Panje (Bangalore, IN); Yeqing Wang (Horsham, PA); David Harold Grant (Doylestown, PA); Archan Kooli (Bangalore, IN); Virendra Singh (Bangalore, IN); Lakshmi Arunkumar (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: ARRIS Enterprises LLC
H04N21/4425H04N17/004H04N21/4424H04N21/4882H04N1/00002H04N5/76H04N17/04H04N17/045H04N17/06H04N21/25808
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,832,525
App. No.
14/881,344
Granted
Nov 28, 2017
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems, and computer readable media can be operable to monitor for and alert the occurrence of pre-failure indicators at a set-top box (STB) disk. Results of self-monitoring tests, short tests, and maximum/minimum performance tests may be used to identify the potential for a STB disk failure. Moreover, critical error events at the STB may be logged, and the health of the STB disk may be determined based on the logged critical error events. Test results and critical error event logs may be used to predict an impending failure of a STB disk, and a notification may be output to a user or technician indicating the potential need to replace the STB or STB disk.

Claims (47)

1. A method comprising:

determining a number of simulation operations to perform on a set-top box disk, wherein the number of simulation operations is based on one or more capabilities of the set-top box disk;

determining a bitrate at which to perform each of the simulation operations, wherein the bitrate at which to perform each of the simulation operations is based on one or more capabilities of the set-top box disk;

performing the simulation operations on the set-top box disk at the determined bitrate;

monitoring one or more components of a set-top box associated with the set-top box disk for critical errors; and

if one or more critical errors are observed at the set-top box while the simulation operations are being performed on the set-top box disk, outputting a notification indicating the need for replacement of the set-top box disk.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the number of simulation operations performed on the set-top box disk is based on the number of read operations and write operations for which the set-top box disk is configured to simultaneously perform.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a maximum number of simultaneous read operations and write operations that are performed on the set-top box disk over a certain period of time; and

wherein the number of simulation operations performed on the set-top box disk is based on the determined maximum number of simultaneous read operations and write operations performed on the set-top box disk over the certain period of time.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining an average number of simultaneous read operations and write operations that are performed on the set-top box disk over a certain period of time; and

wherein the number of simulation operations performed on the set-top box disk is based on the determined average number of simultaneous read operations and write operations performed on the set-top box disk over the certain period of time.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bitrate at which each respective simulation operation is performed on the set-top box disk is based on an average bitrate associated with read or write operations.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the simulation operations are performed at a significant distribution of points throughout the set-top box disk.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the simulation operations are performed on the set-top box disk using non-data-destructive testing.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the notification comprises a log of the identified critical errors, and wherein the notification is output from the set-top box to a remote server.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein one or more observed critical errors comprise buffer interruptions.

10. An apparatus comprising:

a module that:

determines a number of simulation operations to perform on a disk, wherein the number of simulation operations is based on read and write capabilities of the disk;

determines a bitrate at which to perform each of the simulation operations;

performs the simulation operations on the disk at the determined bitrate; and

monitors the disk for critical errors; and

an interface that outputs a notification indicating the need for replacement of the disk if one or more critical errors are observed while the simulation operations are being performed on the disk.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the number of simulation operations performed on the disk is based on the number of read operations and write operations for which the disk is configured to simultaneously perform.

12. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the module further:

determines a maximum number of simultaneous read operations and write operations that are performed on the disk over a certain period of time; and

wherein the number of simulation operations performed on the disk is based on the determined maximum number of simultaneous read operations and write operations performed on the disk over the certain period of time.

13. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the module further:

determines an average number of simultaneous read operations and write operations that are performed on the disk over a certain period of time; and

wherein the number of simulation operations performed on the disk is based on the determined average number of simultaneous read operations and write operations performed on the disk over the certain period of time.

14. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the simulation operations are performed at a significant distribution of points throughout the disk.

15. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the notification comprises a log of the identified critical errors, and wherein the notification is output to a remote server.

16. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the simulation operations are performed on the disk using non-data-destructive testing.

17. A method comprising:

running one or more self-monitoring tests on a set-top box disk;

logging the occurrence of critical disk errors at the set-top box disk;

running one or more use-case specific tests on the set-top box disk, wherein the one or more use-case specific tests are based on a use of the set-top box; and

based on the results of the self-monitoring tests, the occurrence of critical disk errors, and the results of the one or more use-case specific tests, outputting a notification indicating the need for replacement of the set-top box disk;

monitoring throughput at the set-top box disk for a first predetermined period;

determining an average throughput for the first predetermined period;

monitoring throughput at the set-top box disk for a second predetermined period;

determining an average throughput for the second predetermined period; and

if the average throughput for the second predetermined period is less than the average throughput for the first predetermined period by a predetermined threshold, outputting a notification identifying the set-top box disk as a disk that is trending toward a failure.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the average throughput for the first predetermined period and the average throughput for the second predetermined period comprises the average maximum throughput observed during each respective period.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the first predetermined period and the second predetermined period are of equivalent durations.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 049905/0504 Recorded Dec 19, 2024
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC (F/K/A ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.); ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; RUCKUS WIRELESS, LLC (F/K/A RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 071477/0255 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2024
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE INC., OF NORTH CAROLINA; OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC; RUCKUS IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC
Reel/Frame 069889/0114 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST
Reel/Frame 060752/0001 →
ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049892/0396 →
TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049905/0504 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 049820/0495 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 25, 2019
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 049586/0470 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 14, 2017
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES INC
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 041995/0031 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2015
From: PANJE, KRISHNA PRASAD; WANG, YEQING; GRANT, DAVID HAROLD; KOOLI, ARCHAN; SINGH, VIRENDRA; ARUNKUMAR, LAKSHMI
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 037029/0692 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62063083 · Oct 13, 2014
Related Publication 20160105715A1 · Apr 14, 2016