IP Library Patent Application 15329137
Patent Application
App. No. 15/329,137

IMPROVEMENT MESSAGE BASED ON ELEMENT SCORE

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/329,137
Filed
Jan 25, 2017
Examiner
WU, RUTAO
Art Unit
3623
USPC
705/7.39
Abstract

In one implementation, a service management system can include a candidate engine to identify a plurality of elements of an ITSM process, a parameter engine to identify a plurality of parameters associated with the plurality of elements, a score engine to identify a score of a first element of the plurality of elements, and a suggestion engine to cause an improvement message to be generated based on the score and the plurality of elements.

Claims (60)

1 . A service management system comprising:

a candidate engine to identify a plurality of elements of an information technology service management (“ITSM”) process that affect a performance indicator value associated with an ITSM metric;

a parameter engine to identify a plurality of parameters that assure a modification to a plurality of elements, the modification based on the ITSM metric and each of the plurality of parameters to be a measurable attribute of the plurality of elements;

a score engine to identify a score of a first element of the plurality of elements using a score function based on the plurality of parameters; and

a suggestion engine to cause an improvement message to be generated based on the score and the plurality of elements.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the candidate engine is to calculate the performance indicator value over a time range;

the parameter engine is to identify the plurality of parameters based on past performance analysis and a status of the first element; and

the score engine is to define the score function based on the plurality of parameters.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the parameter engine is to:

identify a first parameter of the plurality of elements based in a degree of improvement to the performance indicator value; and

identify a second parameter of the plurality of elements based on a degree of feasibility to implement the modification associated with the first element.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the parameter engine is to:

analyze historical data based on a machine learning technique to identify a correlation among attributes of the plurality of elements and the performance indicator value;

identify the first parameter based on the correlation; and

identify the degree of feasibility based on a difference between a current ITSM process and a proposed ITSM process.

5 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a user engine to receive data source arguments and score arguments, the data source arguments to define at least one of a time range and a set of dimensions and the data source arguments to define at least one of a parameter class, a parameter weight, a target function, and the score function; and

a data source to store a suggestion template, the suggestion engine to produce an improvement message based on the suggestion template, the score, and the performance indicator value.

6 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising a set of instructions executable by a processor resource to:

identify a plurality of parameters to evaluate a modification to a first information technology service management (“ITSM”) element against an ITSM metric based on historical analysis data and a current status of the first ITSM element;

evaluate a first score of the first ITSM element based on a score function, the score function based on the plurality of parameters aggregated based on a plurality of weights associated with the plurality of parameters;

compare the first score to a second score of a second ITSM element; and

cause an improvement message to be presented to a user when the first score indicates a performance indicator value is more improved by modifying the first ITSM element than modifying the second ITSM element, the improvement message to identify the modification to the first ITSM element.

7 . The medium of claim 6 , wherein the set of instructions to identify the plurality of parameters is executable by the processor resource to:

identify a first parameter of the plurality of parameters based on a degree of directness of the first parameter to indicate an increase in the performance indicator value; and

identify a second parameter of the plurality of parameters based on a degree of feasibility to implement the modification on the first ITSM element.

8 . The medium of claim 6 , wherein the first ITSM element is a record and the modification is one of:

a change to an attribute of the record;

a switch from a first model type to a second model type; and

an update to an automation status of an aspect of the first model type.

9 . The medium of claim 6 , wherein the set of instructions is executable by the processor resource to:

gather historical data associated with the plurality of parameters based on a time range; and

provide the plurality of weights based on one of a subject matter expert analysis and a machine learning technique.

10 . The medium of claim 6 , wherein the first ITSM element is a change record and the ITSM metric is one of:

a change success rate to describe a number of success changes based on a number of total change;

a change automation rate to describe a number of automated changes based on the number of total change; and

a change standardization rate to describe a number of standard changes based on the number of total change.

11 . A method of improvement identification comprising:

identifying a key performance indicator (“KPI”) to measure an information technology service management (“ITSM”) evaluation metric;

defining a plurality of parameters to identify possible improvement to the KPI based on an ITSM element modification;

defining a score function based on the plurality of parameters and a plurality of weights;

identifying a plurality of candidate elements of an ITSM process, that when modified, affect the ITSM evaluation metric;

calculating a plurality of scores associated with the plurality of candidate elements based on the score function; and

providing an improvement message based on a comparison among the plurality of scores, the improvement message to describe the ITSM element modification.

12 . The method of claim 11 , comprising:

identifying an attribute of the plurality of candidate elements that is relevant to an evaluation purpose of the ITSM evaluation metric;

identifying a degree of improvement of the KPI based on the ITSM element modification; and

identifying a degree of feasibility of the improvement based on the ITSM element modification suggested by the improvement message, the ITSM element modification to be a change to a model of the element.

13 . The method of claim 11 , comprising:

selecting a first score of the plurality of scores, the first score to achieve a predetermined threshold; and

selecting the improvement message associated with a first candidate element of the plurality of candidate elements that is associated with the first score of the plurality of scores.

14 . The method of claim 11 , comprising:

sampling a first candidate element of the plurality of candidate elements at a frequency identified by one of a predetermined time range and a user input; and

saving a set of historical data that describes a performance of the first candidate element during a time period based on the frequency.

15 . The method of claim 11 , comprising:

defining, based on user-provided information, one of the ITSM evaluation metric, the plurality of parameters, the plurality of weights, and a time range;

causing the improvement message to present to a user;

causing a visual indicator associated with a degree of improvement of the KPI to present to the user; and

modifying one of a property and a status of a first candidate element of the plurality of candidate elements based on the improvement message and a user action associated with the improvement message.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 044183/0718 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC (F/K/A ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC); BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.; SERENA SOFTWARE, INC; ATTACHMATE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE INC. (F/K/A NOVELL, INC.); NETIQ CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062746/0399 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 044183/0577 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC (F/K/A ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC)
Reel/Frame 063560/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 8, 2019
From: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC
Reel/Frame 050004/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC; ARCSIGHT, LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 044183/0577 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2017
From: ATTACHMATE CORPORATION; BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; NETIQ CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE, INC.; ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC; ARCSIGHT, LLC; SERENA SOFTWARE, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 044183/0718 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2017
From: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
To: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
Reel/Frame 042746/0130 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 6, 2017
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
To: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
Reel/Frame 042179/0200 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2017
From: ATEDGI, EINAT; REZNIK, LEO; SITYON, ARIK; DANON, NOA
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 041700/0044 →