IP Library Patent Application 15920958
Patent Application
App. No. 15/920,958

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR QUALITY RANKING OF MEDIA

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/920,958
Abstract

In accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus comprises a processor configured to monitor a user's quality parameter preference to determine a quality parameter for a reference media, update the quality parameter of the reference media, and adapt the quality parameter of the reference media.

Claims (28)

1 . (canceled)

2 . A method comprising:

determining one or more quality parameters for ranking a candidate media;

assigning a value for each of the one or more quality parameters;

determining whether there is a reference media, wherein the reference media is a representation of a quality level of a media;

in response to determining there is a reference media, calculating a quality score based at least in part on a comparison on the one or more quality parameters between the candidate media and the reference media; and

in response to determining there is no reference media, calculating a quality score based at least in part on a quality level of each of the one or more quality parameters of the candidate media.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the one or more quality parameters comprise one or more of: resolution, sharpness, signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range, tonal balance, color balance, distortion, light falloff, lateral chromatic aberration, veiling glare, horizontal alignment, vertical alignment and facial detection.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the quality level comprises one of good, average and low level.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein determining one or more quality parameters for ranking a candidate media comprises determining one or more quality parameters for ranking a candidate media based on a user quality preference.

6 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising determining the reference media based on a user quality preference.

7 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising providing a user interface to receive a user input on the user quality preference.

8 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising automatically adapting the user quality preference based at least in part on monitoring user behavior.

9 . A server comprising:

a network interface;

a database configured to store a plurality of quality parameters; and

a processor communicatively coupled to the network interface and the database, the processor configured to:

determine one or more quality parameters for ranking a candidate media,

assign a value for each of the one or more quality parameters,

determine whether there is a reference media, wherein the reference media is a representation of a quality level of a media,

in response to determining there is a reference media, calculating a quality score based at least in part on a comparison on the one or more quality parameters between the candidate media and the reference media, and

in response to determining there is no reference media, calculating a quality score based at least in part on a quality level of each of the one or more quality parameters of the candidate media.

10 . The server of claim 9 , wherein the one or more quality parameters comprise one or more of: resolution, sharpness, signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range, tonal balance, color balance, distortion, light falloff, lateral chromatic aberration, veiling glare, horizontal alignment, vertical alignment and facial detection.

11 . The server of claim 9 , wherein the quality level comprises one of good, average and low level.

12 . The server of claim 9 , wherein when determining one or more quality parameters for ranking a candidate media the processor is further configured to determine one or more quality parameters for ranking a candidate media based on a user quality preference.

13 . The server of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine the reference media based on a user quality preference.

14 . The server of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to provide a user interface to receive a user input on the user quality preference.

15 . The server of claim 9 , wherein the processor is further configured to automatically adapt the user quality preference based at least in part on monitoring user behavior.

Assignments (2)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2021
From: CPPIB CREDIT INVESTMENTS INC.
To: CONVERSANT WIRELESS LICENSING S.A R.L.
Reel/Frame 055910/0698 →
AMENDED AND RESTATED U.S. PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (FOR NON-U.S. GRANTORS) Recorded Aug 22, 2018
From: CONVERSANT WIRELESS LICENSING S.A R.L.
To: CPPIB CREDIT INVESTMENTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 046897/0001 →