IP Library Patent Application 15994951
Patent Application
App. No. 15/994,951

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPLIT NETWORK TUNNELING BASED ON TRAFFIC INSPECTION

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
15/994,951
Abstract

The disclosed computer-implemented method for split network tunneling based on traffic inspection may include a computing device directing network traffic to a network client of the computing device. The network client may perform an inspection of the network traffic. The network traffic may be categorized based on the inspection. In response to categorizing the network traffic, a security action may be performed to protect the computing device from computer malware. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.

Claims (78)

1 . A computer-implemented method for split network tunneling based on traffic inspection, at least a portion of the method being performed by a computing device comprising at least one processor, the method comprising:

directing, by the computing device, network traffic to a network client of the computing device;

performing, by the network client, an inspection of the network traffic;

categorizing the network traffic based on the inspection; and

in response to categorizing the network traffic, performing a security action to protect the computing device from computer malware.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein performing the inspection of the network traffic comprises determining that the network traffic is a domain name system (DNS) request.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

parsing the network traffic;

extracting a domain name from the network traffic;

determining a reputation of the domain name; and

in response to determining the reputation of the domain name, performing the security action, wherein the security action comprises one of blocking access to a domain of the domain name and allowing access to the domain of the domain name.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein performing the inspection of the network traffic comprises determining that the network traffic is a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) request.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising:

parsing the network traffic;

determining that the HTTP request is for a protected resource of a remote server; and

performing the security action, wherein the security action comprises transmitting the network traffic over a secure tunnel to the remote server.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the security action comprises at least one of:

blocking transmission of the network traffic;

transmitting the network traffic directly to a destination host; and

transmitting the network traffic through a secure tunnel connection to a remote server.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising:

establishing a secure channel to a designated server; and

transmitting a portion of the network traffic to the designated server using the secure channel.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the secure tunnel connection is at least one of:

a transport layer security (TLS) tunnel;

a datagram TLS (DTLS) tunnel;

an Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) tunnel; and

an OpenVPN tunnel.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein transmitting the network traffic directly to the destination host further comprises:

transmitting a payload of a packet of the network traffic directly to the destination host;

receiving a response from the destination host;

embedding the response in a response packet; and

transmitting the response packet to the network client.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

logging the network traffic and the security action;

correlating the network traffic and the security action; and

generating a policy for the inspection of the network traffic based at least in part on correlations of the network traffic and the security action.

11 . A system for split network tunneling based on traffic inspection, the system comprising:

a computing device comprising at least one physical processor; and

physical memory comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the at least one physical processor, cause the computing device to:

direct network traffic to a network client of the computing device;

perform, by the network client, an inspection of the network traffic;

categorize the network traffic based on the inspection; and

in response to categorizing the network traffic, perform a security action to protect the computing device from computer malware.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein, to perform the inspection of the network traffic, the computer-executable instructions further cause the one or more computing devices to determine that the network traffic is a domain name system (DNS) request.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computing device to:

parse the network traffic;

extract a domain name from the network traffic;

determine a reputation of the domain name; and

in response to a determination of the reputation of the domain name, perform the security action, wherein the security action comprises one of blocking access to a domain of the domain name and allowing access to the domain of the domain name.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein, to perform the inspection of the network traffic, the computer-executable instructions further cause the computing device to determine that the network traffic is a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) request.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the one or more computing devices to:

parse the network traffic;

determine that the HTTP request is for a protected resource of a remote server; and

perform the security action, wherein the security action comprises transmitting the network traffic over a secure tunnel to the remote server.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the security action comprises at least one of:

block transmission of the network traffic;

transmit the network traffic directly to a destination host; and

transmit the network traffic through a secure tunnel connection to a remote server.

17 . The system of claim 16 , wherein the secure tunnel connection is at least one of:

a transport layer security (TLS) tunnel;

a datagram TLS (DTLS) tunnel;

an Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) tunnel; and

an OpenVPN tunnel.

18 . The system of claim 16 , wherein, to transmit the network traffic directly to a destination host, the computer-executable instructions further cause the computing device to:

transmit a payload of a packet of the network traffic directly to the destination host;

receive a response from the destination host;

embed the response in a response packet; and

transmit the response packet to the network client.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the one or more computing devices to:

log the network traffic and the security action;

correlate the network traffic and the security action; and

generate a policy for the inspection of the network traffic based at least in part on correlations of the network traffic and the security action.

20 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising one or more computer-executable instructions that, when executed by at least one processor of a computing device, cause the computing device to:

direct network traffic to a network client of the computing device;

perform, by the network client, an inspection of the network traffic;

categorize the network traffic based on the inspection; and

in response to categorizing the network traffic, perform a security action to protect the computing device from computer malware.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2019
From: SYMANTEC CORPORATION
To: CA, INC.
Reel/Frame 051144/0918 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2018
From: SONG, QU BO; AIMOTO, SHAUN; LI, WEILIANG; CHEN, JOSEPH
To: SYMANTEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 045957/0400 →