IP Library Granted Patent US 10,830,874
Granted Patent B2
US 10,830,874 · App. 16/106,377 · Granted Nov 10, 2020

Method to determine the suitability of a radar target as a positional landmark

Inventors: Alexander Ioffe (Bonn, DE); Wolfgang Doerr (Wiehl, DE); Uri Iurgel (Wuppertal, DE); Konstantin Statnikov (Dusseldorf, DE); Honghui Yan (Wuppertal, DE)
Assignee: Aptiv Technologies Limited
G01S7/41G01S7/414G01S7/415G01S13/08G01S13/26G01S13/42G01S13/931G01S13/582G01S13/584G01S13/726
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,830,874
App. No.
16/106,377
Granted
Nov 10, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A vehicle-based method to determine the suitability of an object in the vicinity of a vehicle as a suitable positional landmark, comprising the steps of: a) emitting a plurality of radar signals from a vehicle; b) detecting the radar returns from said emitted radar signals reflected by said object; c) analyzing at least one parameter of at least one radar return to determine the extent to which said object is a stationary object; d) analyzing at least one parameter of at least one radar return to determine the extent to which said object is a single scatterer; e) analyzing at least one parameter of a plurality of radar returns to determine the extent to which said parameter varies with the azimuthal angle between said vehicle and said object, f) determining the suitability of said landmark for the results of steps c), d) and e).

Claims (15)

1. A vehicle-based method to determine the suitability of an object in the vicinity of a vehicle as a suitable positional landmark, wherein the suitable positional landmark is a single stationary scatterer whose scattering position, reflectivity and polarization do not vary over time, distance and observation angle,

the method comprising the steps of:

a) emitting a plurality of radar signals from a vehicle;

b) detecting the radar returns from said emitted radar signals reflected by said object;

c) analyzing at least one parameter of at least one radar return by comparing the radar return with that expected from a stationary target to determine if said object is a stationary object;

d) analyzing at least one parameter of at least one radar return by determining the correlation of the radar return with a known system-dependent single scatterer response to determine if said object is a single scatterer;

e) analyzing at least one parameter of a plurality of radar returns to determine the variation of said parameter with the azimuthal angle between said vehicle and said object; and

f) determining the suitability of said landmark for the results of steps c), d) and e).

2. A method as claimed in claim 1 used in a vehicle based system, said system including a radar antenna and receiver unit adapted to transmit radar signals and receive reflected radar detections from objects in the vicinity of the vehicle.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein said radar antenna and receiver unit comprises a plurality of antenna and receiving elements arranged as an antenna array.

4. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein step d) comprises analyzing range profiles and Doppler profiles of the radar returns across the plurality of antennas.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein step f) comprises determining the extent to which one or more of the following varies with azimuthal angle: phase characteristics, polarization characteristics and signal-to-noise ratio.

6. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein step c) comprises analyzing said radar parameter in conjunction with speed, direction of motion or positional data from a navigation system of said vehicle.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein in step e) said change in azimuthal angle is determined from location or speed and direction information from a navigation system of said vehicle.

8. A method as claimed claim 1 wherein step e) comprises determining from said radar, changes in the scattering center position of said object with azimuthal angle.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT SERVICES S.À R.L.
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
Reel/Frame 066551/0219 →
MERGER Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES (2) S.À R.L.
To: APTIV MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT SERVICES S.À R.L.
Reel/Frame 066566/0173 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES (2) S.À R.L.
Reel/Frame 066746/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2020
From: DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 052044/0428 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2019
From: IOFFE, ALEXANDER; DOERR, WOLFGANG; IURGEL, URI; STATNIKOV, KONSTANTIN; YAN, HONGHUI
To: DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 048834/0600 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 17190576 · Sep 12, 2017 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200319300A1 · Oct 8, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,330,632