IP Library Granted Patent US 11,160,220
Granted Patent B2
US 11,160,220 · App. 16/555,602 · Granted Nov 2, 2021

Identifying management zones in agricultural fields and generating planting plans for the zones

Inventors: Anahita Hassanzadeh (San Francisco, CA); Ye Chen (Pleasanton, CA); Alex Wimbush (Corte Madera, CA); Marlon Misra (San Francisco, CA); Emily Rowan (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: THE CLIMATE CORPORATION
A01G22/00A01G7/00A01G25/00G05B19/042G06Q10/063G06Q50/02G05B2219/21109G05B2219/25032G05B2219/45017
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,160,220
App. No.
16/555,602
Granted
Nov 2, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

In an embodiment, yield data representing yields of crops that have been harvested from an agricultural field and field characteristics data representing characteristics of the agricultural field is received and used to determine a plurality of management zone delineation options. Each option, of the plurality of management zone delineation options, comprises zone layout data for an option. The plurality of management zone delineation options is determined by: determining a plurality of count values for a management class count; generating, for each count value, a management delineation option by clustering the yield data from and the field characteristics data, assigning zones to clusters, and including the zones in a management zone delineation option. One or more options from the plurality of management zone delineation options are selected and used to determine one or more planting plans. A graphical representation of the options and the planting plans is displayed for a user.

Claims (44)

1. A method comprising:

using instructions programmed in a computer system, determining a plurality of management zone delineation options, wherein each option, of the plurality of management zone delineation options, comprises zone layout digital data for a management zone delineation option that covers an entire agricultural field, and each option, of the plurality of management zone delineation options, has a different count of zones;

receiving a user input;

based on the user input, generating one or more selection criteria;

based on, at least in part, the one or more selection criteria, selecting two or more options from the plurality of management zone delineation options, and determining one or more planting plans for each of the two or more options;

using a presentation layer of the computer system, generating and causing displaying on a computing device a graphical representation of the two or more options of the plurality of management zone delineation options and a graphical representation of the one or more planting plans associated with each of the two or more options.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of management zone delineation options is determined by: determining a plurality of count values for a management class count; for each count value, of the plurality of count values, for each count value, of the plurality of count values, generating a management zone delineation option that covers the agricultural field and that has a count value zones, and including the management zone delineation option, which covers the agricultural field, in the plurality of management zone delineation options.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising: receiving one or more of: zone merging instructions, zone splitting instructions, zone modification instructions, seed selection instructions, target yield instructions, or historical seed planting instructions;

using the instructions programmed in the computer system, based on, at least in part, the target yield instructions, determining for each option from the two or more options, interrelations between target yields and planting recommendations, and displaying the interrelations in a graphical form on the computing device.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising: using the instructions programmed in the computer system, based on, at least in part, the target yield instructions and a cost of seeds, determining for each option from the two or more options, the interrelations between target yields, planting recommendations and planting costs, and displaying the interrelations in a graphical form on the computing device.

5. The method of claim 3 , further comprising: using the instructions programmed in the computer system, based on, at least in part, the target yield instructions, the seed selection instructions, and a cost of seeds, determining for each option from the two or more options, the interrelations between target yields, planting recommendations and planting costs, and displaying the interrelations in a graphical form on the computing device.

6. The method of claim 3 , further comprising: using the instructions programmed in the computer system, determining a second plurality of management zone delineation options; determining one or more second criteria; and based on the one or more second criteria, selecting one or more second options from the second plurality of management zone delineation options.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, using the instructions programmed in the computer system,

using instructions programmed in a computer system comprising one or more processors and computer memory: receiving yield data representing yields of crops that have been harvested from an agricultural field, and field characteristics data representing one or more characteristics of the agricultural field;

pre-processing the yield data and the field characteristics data by: generating transformed data by applying an empirical cumulative density function to the yield data and the field characteristics data; generating smooth transformed data by smoothing the transformed data; generating the plurality of management zone delineation options from the smooth transformed data.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, using the instructions programmed in the computer system, post-processing the plurality of management zone delineation options by merging one or more small management zones, included in the plurality of management zone delineation options, with their respective neighboring large zones into a plurality of merged zones zone delineation options.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the field characteristics data for the agricultural field comprises one or more of: soil property data, topographical properties data, one or more soil survey geographical database maps, one or more baresoil maps, or one or more satellite images; wherein the soil property data comprises soil measurement data; wherein the topographical properties data comprises elevation and elevation associated properties data.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, using the instructions, and based upon the two or more options of the plurality of management zone delineation options and the one or more planting plans associated with the two or more options, causing driving one or more of: a seeding apparatus, an irrigation apparatus, an apparatus for application of fertilizers such as nitrogen, or a harvesting apparatus to perform, respectively, seeding, irrigation, application of fertilizers, and/or harvesting of the agricultural field according to an options from the two or more options.

11. A data processing system comprising

a memory;

one or more processors coupled to the memory and programmed to:

determine a plurality of management zone delineation options, wherein each option, of the plurality of management zone delineation options, comprises digital data for a management zone delineation option that covers an entire agricultural field, and each option, of the plurality of management zone delineation options, has a different count of zones;

receive a user input;

based on the user input, generate one or more selection criteria;

based on, at least in part, the one or more selection criteria, select two or more options from the plurality of management zone delineation options, and determine one or more planting plans for each of the two or more options;

generate and cause displaying on a computing device a graphical representation of the two or more options of the plurality of management zone delineation options and a graphical representation of the one or more planting plans associated with each of the two or more options.

12. The data processing system of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of management zone delineation options is determined by: determining a plurality of count values for a management class count; for each count value, of the plurality of count values, for each count value, of the plurality of count values, generating a management zone delineation option that covers the agricultural field and that has a count value zones, and including the management zone delineation option, which covers the agricultural field, in the plurality of management zone delineation options.

13. The data processing system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

receive one or more of: zone merging instructions, zone splitting instructions, zone modification instructions, seed selection instructions, target yield instructions, or historical seed planting instructions;

based on, at least in part, the target yield instructions, determine for each option from the two or more options, interrelations between target yields and planting recommendations, and display the interrelations in a graphical form on the computing device.

14. The data processing system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

based on, at least in part, the target yield instructions and a cost of seeds, determine for each option from the two or more options, the interrelations between target yields, planting recommendations and planting costs, and display the interrelations in a graphical form on the computing device.

15. The data processing system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

based on, at least in part, the target yield instructions, the seed selection instructions, and a cost of seeds, determine for each option from the two or more options, the interrelations between target yields, planting recommendations and planting costs, and display the interrelations in a graphical form on the computing device.

16. The data processing system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

determine a second plurality of management zone delineation options; determine one or more second criteria; and based on the one or more second criteria, select one or more second options from the second plurality of management zone delineation options.

17. The data processing system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

using instructions programmed in a computer system comprising one or more processors and computer memory: receiving yield data representing yields of crops that have been harvested from an agricultural field, and field characteristics data representing one or more characteristics of the agricultural field;

pre-process the yield data and the field characteristics data by: generating transformed data by applying an empirical cumulative density function to the yield data and the field characteristics data; generating smooth transformed data by smoothing the transformed data; generating the plurality of management zone delineation options from the smooth transformed data.

18. The data processing system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

post-process the plurality of management zone delineation options by merging one or more small management zones, included in the plurality of management zone delineation options, with their respective neighboring large zones into a plurality of merged zones zone delineation options.

19. The data processing system of claim 17 , wherein the field characteristics data for the agricultural field comprises one or more of: soil property data, topographical properties data, one or more soil survey geographical database maps, one or more baresoil maps, or one or more satellite images; wherein the soil property data comprises soil measurement data; wherein the topographical properties data comprises elevation and elevation associated properties data.

20. The data processing system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further programmed to:

based upon the two or more options of the plurality of management zone delineation options and the one or more planting plans associated with the two or more options, cause driving one or more of: a seeding apparatus, an irrigation apparatus, an apparatus for application of fertilizers such as nitrogen, or a harvesting apparatus to perform, respectively, seeding, irrigation, application of fertilizers, and/or harvesting of the agricultural field according to an options from the two or more options.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2026
From: CLIMATE LLC
To: MONSANTO COMPANY
Reel/Frame 075177/0751 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2026
From: MONSANTO COMPANY
To: MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 075177/0908 →
CHANGE IN PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS Recorded Sep 2, 2025
From: CLIMATE LLC
To: CLIMATE LLC
Reel/Frame 072810/0444 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 16, 2024
From: HASSANZADEH, ANAHITA; CHEN, YE; WIMBUSH, ALEX; MISRA, MARLON; ROWAN, EMILY
To: THE CLIMATE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067117/0553 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 16, 2023
From: THE CLIMATE CORPORATION
To: CLIMATE LLC
Reel/Frame 065610/0571 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15352898 · Nov 16, 2016
Related Publication 20200008371A1 · Jan 9, 2020