IP Library Granted Patent US 11,463,336
Granted Patent B2
US 11,463,336 · App. 17/171,246 · Granted Oct 4, 2022

Conferencing session management

Inventor: Manish Dusad (Galway, IE)
Assignee: Avaya Management L.P.
H04L43/08G06F3/1454H04N7/15
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,463,336
App. No.
17/171,246
Granted
Oct 4, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Electronic conferences allow participants to join lectures, meetings, and other events remotely via connection of a computing device to a network. The quality received by each node may not be ideal, or even satisfactory. Presenters of the conference content are made aware of the state of the participants by determining, at the end device receiving the conference, a quality of the conference. A monitoring node, such as a communication device utilized by a presenter, may then provide indications of the quality received.

Claims (43)

1. A system, comprising:

a network interface to a network; and

a processor configured with instructions maintained in a non-transitory memory that, when read by the processor, cause the processor to:

monitor, for each of a plurality of nodes, an electronic conference as received by each node from the network;

determine, for each node, a quality of the electronic conference as received by each node; and

cause a monitoring node, monitoring the electronic conference, to display for each node an indicia of the quality; and

wherein the processor causes the monitoring node to display, for each node, an indicia of the quality, further comprising automatically moving the indicia associated with each node to a position on the monitoring node closest to a location of the monitoring node designated for low-quality reception wherein each node is a distance from the location based on the determined quality of the electronic conference.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the processor monitors the electronic conference as transmitted to the network;

the processor monitors the electronic conference further comprising, for at least one node, remotely capturing a snapshot of a visual portion of the electronic conference from the at least one node; and

the processor determines the quality, for the at least one node, comprising comparing the snapshot to the electronic conference as transmitted.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the comparison of the snapshot to the electronic conference comprises a data loss between the electronic conference as transmitted and the snapshot.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein the comparison of the snapshot to the electronic conference comprises determining a delay between a time the snapshot was presented on the at least one node, and a time the electronic conference transmitted a portion of the electronic conference corresponding to the snapshot.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor monitors the electronic conference further comprising, for at least one node, determining a number of acknowledgement messages received, for a given time, by the at least one node, versus a sent number of packets comprising a portion of the electronic conference during the given time.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor monitors the electronic conference further comprising, for at least one node, determining a time an acknowledgement message is received by the processor from the at least one node versus a time the acknowledgement message is expected to be received by the processor.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor orders the indica of the quality in response to a user input on the monitoring node based on a specific criteria, wherein the specific criteria comprises the quality of the electronic conference.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor determines, for each node, the quality of the electronic conference as received by each node, further comprising determining a video quality of a video portion of the electronic conference received by each node.

9. A method, comprising:

monitoring, for each of a plurality of nodes, an electronic conference as received by each node from a network;

determining, for each node, a quality of the electronic conference as received by each node;

displaying, for each node, an indicia of the quality on a monitoring node monitoring the electronic conference; and

automatically moving the indicia associated with each node to a position on the monitoring node closest to a location of the monitoring node designated for low-quality reception wherein each node is a distance from the location based on the determined quality of the electronic conference.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

monitoring the electronic conference as transmitted to the network;

wherein monitoring further comprises, for at least one node, remotely capturing a snapshot of a visual portion of the electronic conference from the at least one node; and

wherein determining the quality, for the at least one node, comprises comparing the snapshot to the electronic conference as transmitted.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein comparing the snapshot to the electronic conference comprises determining a data loss between the electronic conference as transmitted and the snapshot.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein comparing the snapshot to the electronic conference comprises determining a delay between a time the snapshot was presented on the at least one node, and a time the electronic conference transmitted a portion of the electronic conference corresponding to the snapshot.

13. The method of claim 9 , further comprising, for at least one node, determining a number of acknowledgement messages received, for a given time, by the at least one node, versus a transmitted number of packets comprising a portion of the electronic conference during the given time.

14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising, for at least one node, determining a time an acknowledgement message is received by a processor from the at least one node versus a time the acknowledgement message is expected to be received by the processor.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein moving of the indicia associated with each node occurs in response to receiving a user input on the monitoring node based on a specific criteria, wherein the specific criteria comprises the quality of the electronic conference.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining, for each node, the quality of the electronic conference as received by each node, further comprising determining a video quality of a video portion of the electronic conference received by each node.

17. A system, comprising:

means to monitor, for each of a plurality of nodes, an electronic conference as received by each node from a network;

means to determine, for each node, a quality of the electronic conference as received by each node;

means to display, for each node, an indicia of the quality on a monitoring node; and

means to automatically move the indicia associated with each node to a position on the monitoring node closest to a location of the monitoring node designated for low-quality reception wherein each node is a distance from the location based on the determined quality of the electronic conference.

18. The system of claim 17 , further comprising:

means to monitor the electronic conference as transmitted to the network;

wherein the means to monitor the electronic conference further comprises, for at least one node, means to remotely capture a snapshot of a visual portion of the electronic conference from the at least one node; and

the means to determine the quality, for the at least one node, further comprises means to compare the snapshot to the electronic conference as transmitted.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the means to monitor the electronic conference further comprises, for at least one node, means to determine a number of acknowledgement messages received, for a given time, by the at least one node, versus a sent number of packets comprising a portion of the electronic conference during the given time.

20. The system of claim 17 , further comprising, for at least one node, means to determine a time an acknowledgement message is received from the at least one node versus a time the acknowledgement message is expected to be received.

Assignments (7)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (REEL/FRAME 61087/0386) Recorded May 18, 2023
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA INTEGRATED CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 063690/0359 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 4, 2023
From: AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; INTELLISIST, INC.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063542/0662 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 3, 2023
From: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; KNOAHSOFT INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB [COLLATERAL AGENT]
Reel/Frame 063742/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT REEL 57700/FRAME 0935 Recorded Apr 26, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: AVAYA HOLDINGS CORP.; AVAYA INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 063458/0303 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: AVAYA INC.; INTELLISIST, INC.; AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.; AVAYA CABINET SOLUTIONS LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061087/0386 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2021
From: AVAYA MANAGEMENT LP
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 057700/0935 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 9, 2021
From: DUSAD, MANISH
To: AVAYA MANAGEMENT L.P.
Reel/Frame 055196/0890 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220255819A1 · Aug 11, 2022